F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Titles needing SSE4.2 CPU support

Titles needing SSE4.2 CPU support

Titles needing SSE4.2 CPU support

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
L
LyoZai
Junior Member
17
04-21-2016, 04:49 PM
#1
Here’s a summary of games that need SSE4.2 support. You might find what you’re looking for in these categories:

- Older titles that rely on SSE4.1 (like Q9650 and E5450)
- Games that can run at medium specifications with a powerful GPU
- Titles that were originally designed for CPUs without SSE4.2 but benefit from it with modern hardware

If you need a precise list, checking gaming forums, Steam community boards, or specialized tech sites like PCGames.net or IGN’s compatibility charts would be helpful. Let me know if you want guidance on how to verify a specific game!
L
LyoZai
04-21-2016, 04:49 PM #1

Here’s a summary of games that need SSE4.2 support. You might find what you’re looking for in these categories:

- Older titles that rely on SSE4.1 (like Q9650 and E5450)
- Games that can run at medium specifications with a powerful GPU
- Titles that were originally designed for CPUs without SSE4.2 but benefit from it with modern hardware

If you need a precise list, checking gaming forums, Steam community boards, or specialized tech sites like PCGames.net or IGN’s compatibility charts would be helpful. Let me know if you want guidance on how to verify a specific game!

S
SturmflockeHD
Junior Member
35
04-21-2016, 08:09 PM
#2
Quantum Break PUBG works with previous game versions such as MGSV and No Mans Sky too
S
SturmflockeHD
04-21-2016, 08:09 PM #2

Quantum Break PUBG works with previous game versions such as MGSV and No Mans Sky too

A
anakindaur
Senior Member
576
04-22-2016, 01:15 AM
#3
According to current understanding, the main need for SSE4.2 came from DRM systems like Denuvo.
A
anakindaur
04-22-2016, 01:15 AM #3

According to current understanding, the main need for SSE4.2 came from DRM systems like Denuvo.

B
bassdropbanana
Junior Member
45
04-23-2016, 03:09 PM
#4
Some newer Denuvo DRM games need version 4.2 to function properly.
B
bassdropbanana
04-23-2016, 03:09 PM #4

Some newer Denuvo DRM games need version 4.2 to function properly.

S
SoyDash
Posting Freak
859
04-25-2016, 03:46 PM
#5
Here are the titles that mention Denuvo in their Wikipedia entries... It seems these games likely won't run on Harpertown or Yorkfield.
S
SoyDash
04-25-2016, 03:46 PM #5

Here are the titles that mention Denuvo in their Wikipedia entries... It seems these games likely won't run on Harpertown or Yorkfield.

D
DarkFire175
Member
52
04-27-2016, 12:47 AM
#6
They’re already past their prime, haven’t played many games, and even if they do, performance is lacking. They lack 4-core processors; instead, they have 2-core chips combined. The chipset includes an external memory controller, and both CPUs talk through the FSB—this impacts speed. Honestly, back in 2006 you’d think twice about using these parts because 13 years later it feels like going back to 1993. Those were the Pentium models without multipliers, the 5V chips running at 60 and 66MHz, priced around $878 for 965MB of RAM—often just 4-8MB. They look inexpensive, but today’s usable parts are much pricier. LGA1366 boards are affordable, and some decent 4-core CPUs can be found for a few dollars with shipping costs. The issue is that most current options cost a lot. Boards usually run around €200, and many lack support for DDR3-SDRAM, capping RAM at 8GB—making it hard to reach the 4 sticks you need. Some boards are also outdated. If you don’t have a Steam library on your main system, why not try something else? I don’t have a functional PC with good graphics or other features. I’d rather experiment with registered ECC DDR-2 SDRAM and console APUs that support SSE4.2, focusing less on copy protection. Also, Core 2 Duo isn’t listed as a minimum requirement; many modern games need newer architectures like Sandy or Ivy Bridge, or AMD Bulldozer. Just use it with compatible games and be prepared for mixed results.
D
DarkFire175
04-27-2016, 12:47 AM #6

They’re already past their prime, haven’t played many games, and even if they do, performance is lacking. They lack 4-core processors; instead, they have 2-core chips combined. The chipset includes an external memory controller, and both CPUs talk through the FSB—this impacts speed. Honestly, back in 2006 you’d think twice about using these parts because 13 years later it feels like going back to 1993. Those were the Pentium models without multipliers, the 5V chips running at 60 and 66MHz, priced around $878 for 965MB of RAM—often just 4-8MB. They look inexpensive, but today’s usable parts are much pricier. LGA1366 boards are affordable, and some decent 4-core CPUs can be found for a few dollars with shipping costs. The issue is that most current options cost a lot. Boards usually run around €200, and many lack support for DDR3-SDRAM, capping RAM at 8GB—making it hard to reach the 4 sticks you need. Some boards are also outdated. If you don’t have a Steam library on your main system, why not try something else? I don’t have a functional PC with good graphics or other features. I’d rather experiment with registered ECC DDR-2 SDRAM and console APUs that support SSE4.2, focusing less on copy protection. Also, Core 2 Duo isn’t listed as a minimum requirement; many modern games need newer architectures like Sandy or Ivy Bridge, or AMD Bulldozer. Just use it with compatible games and be prepared for mixed results.

K
Kaisetsu
Senior Member
651
04-27-2016, 05:42 AM
#7
You said it right but as I said this is cheap alternative, people why can not afford newer systems and stuck wih legacy 775 socket. You maybe do not remember but you can play most games on Q9650 + 1050Ti. Hard to play 2018 games but still be playable at lowest settings and that contents most people. And extra stuff makes no sense here like: FSB, CORE2DUO, DDR2 or 10 years socket because people play games on it. My friend has that system Q9650 and 750 Ti, other also has Q9650 with 1050 and they play everything, except new games which require SSE 4.2 CPU instructions, 775 doesn't support that, games won't start like AC: ORIGINS, FC5, if that has no DRM that can be playable at low settings. Not everyone wants to play at high settings, when you can't afford it, med settings is also good for you, even low, at least it is better then not player at all right... Also minimum system requirements aren't big deal in this "low spec gamer"case. I have seen many has minimum i5 2500 and 660 GTX but still playable at 30fps on Q9650 DDR2 750Ti system. Core 2 quad is minimum good CPU for minimum gaming. Cos upgrade is easy, cheap, and good enough... Xeon, DDR2, Mobo is cheap... For other systems - Upgrade is hard, costs is high, not very much but combined cost is high. You can not get 2nd gen i5 with mobo and RAM when you are short of funds. You can not get 1St Gen i5 and 1366 mobo, socket is expensive. Of course you can not get 4 gen i5, 4gen is expensive still. Not talking about new systems... #lowspecgamer
K
Kaisetsu
04-27-2016, 05:42 AM #7

You said it right but as I said this is cheap alternative, people why can not afford newer systems and stuck wih legacy 775 socket. You maybe do not remember but you can play most games on Q9650 + 1050Ti. Hard to play 2018 games but still be playable at lowest settings and that contents most people. And extra stuff makes no sense here like: FSB, CORE2DUO, DDR2 or 10 years socket because people play games on it. My friend has that system Q9650 and 750 Ti, other also has Q9650 with 1050 and they play everything, except new games which require SSE 4.2 CPU instructions, 775 doesn't support that, games won't start like AC: ORIGINS, FC5, if that has no DRM that can be playable at low settings. Not everyone wants to play at high settings, when you can't afford it, med settings is also good for you, even low, at least it is better then not player at all right... Also minimum system requirements aren't big deal in this "low spec gamer"case. I have seen many has minimum i5 2500 and 660 GTX but still playable at 30fps on Q9650 DDR2 750Ti system. Core 2 quad is minimum good CPU for minimum gaming. Cos upgrade is easy, cheap, and good enough... Xeon, DDR2, Mobo is cheap... For other systems - Upgrade is hard, costs is high, not very much but combined cost is high. You can not get 2nd gen i5 with mobo and RAM when you are short of funds. You can not get 1St Gen i5 and 1366 mobo, socket is expensive. Of course you can not get 4 gen i5, 4gen is expensive still. Not talking about new systems... #lowspecgamer

R
Reltdeast
Member
151
04-27-2016, 10:29 AM
#8
They shouldn't face trouble acquiring a Sendy Bridge CPU or later with an OEM board. It wouldn't cause the same issues as a Core 2 Duo setup. While a Core i3 is necessary, even those perform better than older generations. For the rest, a console might be more practical. If you're budgeting around 200€ for a 1050ti, investing in a newer system would make more sense, especially since such models are now priced at about 200€ or higher. Your point weakens significantly here, particularly when modern games run smoothly for under 50€. Options like a GTX7770 or Ryzen 3/2200G are viable alternatives. Consider systems with AMD APUs or older consoles—some still offer decent performance. The PS3 and even an AMD APU can handle many titles without breaking the bank. Don't overlook the fact that older hardware is often more affordable than you think, and modern software adapts well. Just search for current specs and alternatives; you'll find better value options available.
R
Reltdeast
04-27-2016, 10:29 AM #8

They shouldn't face trouble acquiring a Sendy Bridge CPU or later with an OEM board. It wouldn't cause the same issues as a Core 2 Duo setup. While a Core i3 is necessary, even those perform better than older generations. For the rest, a console might be more practical. If you're budgeting around 200€ for a 1050ti, investing in a newer system would make more sense, especially since such models are now priced at about 200€ or higher. Your point weakens significantly here, particularly when modern games run smoothly for under 50€. Options like a GTX7770 or Ryzen 3/2200G are viable alternatives. Consider systems with AMD APUs or older consoles—some still offer decent performance. The PS3 and even an AMD APU can handle many titles without breaking the bank. Don't overlook the fact that older hardware is often more affordable than you think, and modern software adapts well. Just search for current specs and alternatives; you'll find better value options available.

I
ItsTheSoul
Senior Member
410
04-27-2016, 12:04 PM
#9
You're aware that the Q9650 can be outperformed by a dual-core i3 2100. There really isn't an upgrade route for 775 socket setups that doesn't get beaten by a current entry-level CPU like the i3 8100 or AMD 2200G. Did you purchase a 1050 Ti to go with your Q9650? What was its price? You might find a 2200G with a motherboard and 8GB RAM for less than $250, and the boost from upgrading the platform would be much more valuable than adding a $200 GPU to an old system. I'd prefer using a 2200G with built-in graphics rather than a discrete GPU on a 10+ year-old machine. If you're okay with low settings, this was likely the smarter choice. The AM4 platform would also offer solid upgrades in the coming years.
I
ItsTheSoul
04-27-2016, 12:04 PM #9

You're aware that the Q9650 can be outperformed by a dual-core i3 2100. There really isn't an upgrade route for 775 socket setups that doesn't get beaten by a current entry-level CPU like the i3 8100 or AMD 2200G. Did you purchase a 1050 Ti to go with your Q9650? What was its price? You might find a 2200G with a motherboard and 8GB RAM for less than $250, and the boost from upgrading the platform would be much more valuable than adding a $200 GPU to an old system. I'd prefer using a 2200G with built-in graphics rather than a discrete GPU on a 10+ year-old machine. If you're okay with low settings, this was likely the smarter choice. The AM4 platform would also offer solid upgrades in the coming years.

V
victordub44
Member
216
04-28-2016, 10:57 AM
#10
First they are 10 years old CPUs, but this doesn't make sense until > they can play games. Nobody cares if they are two 2 core CPUs in package or one single 4 core, > they can play games. For an older system 8GB RAM is enaugh, and they aren't limited at all, most good P45 boards support DDR2 and DDR3 up to 16GB. Again for old system > 8GB RAM = can play games. I said that there are people who doesn't have money, so now you want me to change every part? when I can only change GPU for approx. 100 $ ? 2nd gen Mobo + CPU + RAM you think it is cheap in my place, such upgrade? i.e. i3 2120 isn't any better in games, you can barely get 5fps different. single core performance is better for i3 of course but multicore are the same. such upgrade is stupid. this is where are you mistaken, when we bought 1050 and Ti s they where MSRP priced, and you could get used ones more cheap price. in europe it costs 200 euro maybe but in Us it is 200$ , and one year ago that price was much lower, so nobody has paid 200 euro here... most were bought for 100$ which is proper price for 775 system upgrade. funny it is... oh yes you can buy AMD GPU like 7850 or 7770 but now you want me to buy new PSU? here people have cheap 300-500W PSUs, they doesn't ever have 8pin connector. Generally people wants GPU without additional power connector, like 750, 1050, which are best choices. Oh yes I see you prefer 2200G gaming to 775 / 1050 gaming, cool : X Most people have Intel board here and nobody wants AMD bulldozer CPUs, does they ever have a CPU list in their site ? : X This is ridiculous, talking about cheap PC upgrade and you telling me to buy console. Nobody wants old console, I'm not talking about gamers, I'm not a gamer nor my friends. WE occasionally play games... If someone wants console that should be NEW like PS4... NObody have AMD here... Everybody is INTEL fanboy... People only care when they look like... Please buy Q9650 or X5470 with used GTX 1050 for 100$, you can OC is a little, and you will see that you can GAME on that cheap system , then try it on i3 2120 and 1050 with DDR3 and mark the difference... You are right in this topic, I agree you... but it still said. I see you can have i3 8100 and game on that then have i.e X5450 with 1050 and game on that... good luck BURNING your CPU... please remember what the main topic is all about. Why would someone looks on AMD site when you can game on C2Q with good GPU? If I have to pay 5x electo bills and get new PSU for 7950 that will be the same as if I buy 4gen system with GPU... or why would you buy old GPU when you can buy more energy efficient and latest GPU? Haha tell me how i3 2100 is any better for home desktop PC ? C2Q is almost equal and at some points when it comes to PC performance... I've already answered that... 2200g + mobo + 8gb ram for under $250 ++++ GPU that costs like 350 $ ... while performance will be not very different. You are wrong and got my topic differently, this was about saving on PC upgrade. really cheap and good upgrade. not a gamer upgrade...
V
victordub44
04-28-2016, 10:57 AM #10

First they are 10 years old CPUs, but this doesn't make sense until > they can play games. Nobody cares if they are two 2 core CPUs in package or one single 4 core, > they can play games. For an older system 8GB RAM is enaugh, and they aren't limited at all, most good P45 boards support DDR2 and DDR3 up to 16GB. Again for old system > 8GB RAM = can play games. I said that there are people who doesn't have money, so now you want me to change every part? when I can only change GPU for approx. 100 $ ? 2nd gen Mobo + CPU + RAM you think it is cheap in my place, such upgrade? i.e. i3 2120 isn't any better in games, you can barely get 5fps different. single core performance is better for i3 of course but multicore are the same. such upgrade is stupid. this is where are you mistaken, when we bought 1050 and Ti s they where MSRP priced, and you could get used ones more cheap price. in europe it costs 200 euro maybe but in Us it is 200$ , and one year ago that price was much lower, so nobody has paid 200 euro here... most were bought for 100$ which is proper price for 775 system upgrade. funny it is... oh yes you can buy AMD GPU like 7850 or 7770 but now you want me to buy new PSU? here people have cheap 300-500W PSUs, they doesn't ever have 8pin connector. Generally people wants GPU without additional power connector, like 750, 1050, which are best choices. Oh yes I see you prefer 2200G gaming to 775 / 1050 gaming, cool : X Most people have Intel board here and nobody wants AMD bulldozer CPUs, does they ever have a CPU list in their site ? : X This is ridiculous, talking about cheap PC upgrade and you telling me to buy console. Nobody wants old console, I'm not talking about gamers, I'm not a gamer nor my friends. WE occasionally play games... If someone wants console that should be NEW like PS4... NObody have AMD here... Everybody is INTEL fanboy... People only care when they look like... Please buy Q9650 or X5470 with used GTX 1050 for 100$, you can OC is a little, and you will see that you can GAME on that cheap system , then try it on i3 2120 and 1050 with DDR3 and mark the difference... You are right in this topic, I agree you... but it still said. I see you can have i3 8100 and game on that then have i.e X5450 with 1050 and game on that... good luck BURNING your CPU... please remember what the main topic is all about. Why would someone looks on AMD site when you can game on C2Q with good GPU? If I have to pay 5x electo bills and get new PSU for 7950 that will be the same as if I buy 4gen system with GPU... or why would you buy old GPU when you can buy more energy efficient and latest GPU? Haha tell me how i3 2100 is any better for home desktop PC ? C2Q is almost equal and at some points when it comes to PC performance... I've already answered that... 2200g + mobo + 8gb ram for under $250 ++++ GPU that costs like 350 $ ... while performance will be not very different. You are wrong and got my topic differently, this was about saving on PC upgrade. really cheap and good upgrade. not a gamer upgrade...

Pages (2): 1 2 Next