F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Threadripper 1920X supports low memory clock speeds.

Threadripper 1920X supports low memory clock speeds.

Threadripper 1920X supports low memory clock speeds.

T
165
04-09-2017, 06:40 AM
#1
Hello all, I'm conducting research and my university gave me access to a machine with the specifications listed via SSH. My friend with root privileges ran a command to retrieve memory details, but the output didn't match expectations. It displays a speed of 1200 MT/s, which isn't optimal for performance. The system supports quad channel, so it should be handling 2400 MT/s. If anyone has insights on what might be going wrong or how to interpret the command/output correctly, that would be extremely helpful.

Details:
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS x86_64
- CPU: AMD Threadripper 1920X
- Memory: 4x 16GB Kingston at 2400 MT/s
- Command output shows SMBIOS info with various error codes and formats
- Specified performance targets are not being met

Let me know if you can clarify anything about the command or results.
T
TechSoldierEx2
04-09-2017, 06:40 AM #1

Hello all, I'm conducting research and my university gave me access to a machine with the specifications listed via SSH. My friend with root privileges ran a command to retrieve memory details, but the output didn't match expectations. It displays a speed of 1200 MT/s, which isn't optimal for performance. The system supports quad channel, so it should be handling 2400 MT/s. If anyone has insights on what might be going wrong or how to interpret the command/output correctly, that would be extremely helpful.

Details:
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS x86_64
- CPU: AMD Threadripper 1920X
- Memory: 4x 16GB Kingston at 2400 MT/s
- Command output shows SMBIOS info with various error codes and formats
- Specified performance targets are not being met

Let me know if you can clarify anything about the command or results.

I
iSlowZe_
Junior Member
18
04-14-2017, 10:32 AM
#2
DDR refers to double data rate, meaning 1200x2 equals 2400MHz. At this point, most technically they operate at half the claimed speed because of certain technical factors. Just like in your previous case, you should adjust how you read the signals. It’s unlikely you’re seeing DDR4 memory running at 1200MHz effective clock, since 2133MHz is the minimum required.
I
iSlowZe_
04-14-2017, 10:32 AM #2

DDR refers to double data rate, meaning 1200x2 equals 2400MHz. At this point, most technically they operate at half the claimed speed because of certain technical factors. Just like in your previous case, you should adjust how you read the signals. It’s unlikely you’re seeing DDR4 memory running at 1200MHz effective clock, since 2133MHz is the minimum required.

D
Drayden_
Member
181
05-01-2017, 08:14 PM
#3
The rate of 1200MT/s is accurate, but the advertised frequencies are doubled because some marketers mistakenly believed showing the advantages of DDR required using numbers. Now we need to clarify this occasionally.
D
Drayden_
05-01-2017, 08:14 PM #3

The rate of 1200MT/s is accurate, but the advertised frequencies are doubled because some marketers mistakenly believed showing the advantages of DDR required using numbers. Now we need to clarify this occasionally.

S
SoulzReaped
Member
217
05-02-2017, 12:30 AM
#4
I thought the same thing: but it really does specify the speed in mega transfers per second, not mega hertz, which is supposed to have the doubling already included in the number. When I saw this I looked online for other people's output of the same command and almost nobody was getting lower configured speeds than normal speed, for most people it's their actual MT/s. Link to others using this command: https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions...175667218/
S
SoulzReaped
05-02-2017, 12:30 AM #4

I thought the same thing: but it really does specify the speed in mega transfers per second, not mega hertz, which is supposed to have the doubling already included in the number. When I saw this I looked online for other people's output of the same command and almost nobody was getting lower configured speeds than normal speed, for most people it's their actual MT/s. Link to others using this command: https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions...175667218/

L
levoyageur92
Posting Freak
807
05-04-2017, 05:48 PM
#5
It's simpler to reach the BIOS now, or perhaps install Windows if your storage is free since there are more software choices available.
L
levoyageur92
05-04-2017, 05:48 PM #5

It's simpler to reach the BIOS now, or perhaps install Windows if your storage is free since there are more software choices available.

L
LoHobbit0
Junior Member
12
05-05-2017, 12:52 AM
#6
L
LoHobbit0
05-05-2017, 12:52 AM #6

L
Logan22Bengals
Junior Member
10
05-05-2017, 02:49 AM
#7
The reading shown in the decoder is incorrect. DDR4 typically reaches a minimum of 1600 MT/s or 800 MHz clock speed. The 1200 MT/s value appears to be inaccurate since Jedec DDR4 speeds never drop below 800. Boards with Jedec 2400 MT/s usually stick to that memory rate by default. Anything up to 2667 MT/s (1333 MHz) will reflect the rated Jedec speed. It's currently running at 1200 MHz / 2400 MT/s. No issues here.
L
Logan22Bengals
05-05-2017, 02:49 AM #7

The reading shown in the decoder is incorrect. DDR4 typically reaches a minimum of 1600 MT/s or 800 MHz clock speed. The 1200 MT/s value appears to be inaccurate since Jedec DDR4 speeds never drop below 800. Boards with Jedec 2400 MT/s usually stick to that memory rate by default. Anything up to 2667 MT/s (1333 MHz) will reflect the rated Jedec speed. It's currently running at 1200 MHz / 2400 MT/s. No issues here.

O
OcelotNinja
Member
116
05-05-2017, 01:10 PM
#8
If it's the institution's system, it still counts. Changing it isn't wise. I'd handle your tasks and then proceed.
O
OcelotNinja
05-05-2017, 01:10 PM #8

If it's the institution's system, it still counts. Changing it isn't wise. I'd handle your tasks and then proceed.

N
natixis79
Junior Member
8
05-07-2017, 06:44 AM
#9
I chose not to alter anything; I aimed to document any issues with the machine during performance testing to ensure my findings weren’t affected by slower memory.
N
natixis79
05-07-2017, 06:44 AM #9

I chose not to alter anything; I aimed to document any issues with the machine during performance testing to ensure my findings weren’t affected by slower memory.