This setting doesn't increase to 4.5.
This setting doesn't increase to 4.5.
What ssds specifically? Ngl overclocking ssds sounds pretty interesting so if i can find these myself might aswell try just for the fun of it and if there hasnt been any solid proof yet i may aswell provide some findings and i explain the risks are minimal and almost always exaggerated, besides i mentioned thermal limits so op will hit a thermal wall before even hitting mildly unsafe voltages This is only relevant for owners of gen4 drives that actually use their bandwidth and not a gen4 in a gaming system or gen3 owners I dont think im special i just really really hate conservative garbage volts ruining overclocks And i have demonstrated that i can push well past it and still have no degradation if running 2v+ ddr3 is anything to go by on a platform where 1.65v is considered safe, though newer hardware is abit more fragile so volts cant really be pushed that far anymore aside from ram but thats purely ic dependant where some ddr4 will go well beyond 2v while others dont even scale past 1.35v, still have no safe voltages to reference cause its niche so i set a sanity limit of 1.7v for ddr4 (most will not scale much past 1.7v or hit diminishing returns/thermals) but id personally throw safety to the wind so i can gather data for others to use and enjoy performance benifits
I don't recall the exact details but it seems to be either version 730 or earlier models. It appears they didn't release everything at once, and there are still some units available. These aren't minimal designs. X3D CPUs struggle with higher voltages; even at stock 1.25V, they can exceed 90°C with a large AIO, and raising voltage offers no benefit. Also, the CPU throttles under power limits—raising voltage actually hurts performance. The idea of "undervolting" via Curve Optimizer is more relevant to 7000 series than 5000 series. I also recall someone destroying a 7000 X3D CPU on LN2 by simply setting the BIOS voltage to 1.55V, with no load and it being cold. That voltage isn't extreme for non-X3D chips, especially at low temperatures. Still, it's pointless without proper multiplier control and BCLK limits. It's an unnecessary effort unless you're chasing benchmarks. If your system supports PCIe 4, consider using that instead. Optimizing DRAM tuning usually gives better gains than tweaking BCLK overclocks on a 5800X3D. Getting more than 104MHz BCLK is only worthwhile for serious performance gains, which rarely matters for everyday use. That's why I emphasize this isn't really relevant here. Also, it's not just about having PCIe—it's about the number of connected devices. Five drives make pushing BCLK much harder than one. Overall, your approach to overclocking by forcing voltage is risky and often counterproductive.
oh, actually there is a reason, the 3DV-Cache is tied to the CPU core Multiplier. If you ever wondered.
Absolutely, but it falls short. This doesn't outperform the mentioned results: https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/61153405. For those curious, check out this link: https://www.igorslab.de/en/and-saying-go...-executed/
Isnt dram tweaking on a 5800x3d pointless? all the vids ive seen dont show it scaling past 3200 I determine thermal limits and set my voltage near or at the thermal limit, say 90c 1.45v, in that case i set 1.45v and see what freq i can get, i lower or raise if needed i completely ignore safe voltages unless there is solid evidence of degradation reported by others and not bullshit some non overclocker says, like 1.45v on zen3 backed by der8aur video on degradation testing zen3, dont need arbitrary unproven garbage getting in the way of my overclocks with this logic if i had say a 5500 based system id either look at thermal limits or best v/f though i usually prefer the latter in terms of cpu freq, say 4.8ghz 1.35v vs 5.1ghz 1.5v id prefer the former. Then when i look at ram say i got some decent 16gb 4000c18 bin klevv, i determine voltage target according to how good the cooling is so 1.9v then try to find max freq, with some references from other overclockers alongside cooling solution (fan), maybe ill hit 5800c24 1.9v, then ill run that ram oc after ensuring stability, but if imc cant actually do much more than 2600fclk even with vsoc at 1.5v i detune them to 5200c22/24 and adjust voltage accordingly maybe 1.7v, then ill run that instead cause desync fclk makes no sense on cezanne. Vcore safe seems to be around 1.45v so ill just run at most around 1.5v if i dont just run into thermal limits Vsoc and the others in the cpu seem to be undocumented so ill stick with vcore as a safe volt, if not i just use as much as i need Vdimm depends on ic, good ics generally dont care so ill just run as much as the ic will scale with and cooling allows, in this case around 1.9v Now i can enjoy my speedy system with basically no drawback aside from the inherent volatility of the rams due to high freq, rip 5600 when i can crush it with an overclocked 5500 with some equally fast rams. If something degrades again just resell and replace, and i have never seen any reports of ram degradation When it comes to pcs i find that i should not overrely on others and use my own methodologies, and so far ive only seen good things like having overclocks that arent crippled yet not suffering from any degradstion issues or not overspending on power supplies and still getting high quality functional 700w used psus at a mere 16$. I have not seen a single bad thing about using my own methodologies and other opinions as mere references, nor have i ever seen any bad things come from me not being a pussy and willing to try things out for myself and not just immedeatly assume "ohno 16$ used 700w unknown korea psu bad, imma waste 5x more on a branded unit with no noticable diff irl in terms of functionality" or "ohno over 1.65v vdimm bad for x58, ill just run absolute snails pace overclocks that can barely get over 1600 when a completely safe 2v could get me to 2200+"
58X3D works only with specific games. Once you got this CPU, there aren’t many options left. You’ve turned your setup into a Dell build. Some boards let you clock them in, but they’ll never be completely reliable. I own one too, but it’s a mixed bag. I appreciate the straightforward cooling and decent performance, though most other features fall short. At stock settings, even with tuning, you won’t get 4550 across the board—just a few cores will hit that number.
it performs adequately while still offering decent gains compared to non-X3D, though they’re smaller. it remains valuable given my current standing at 17th on HWbot with only CO and memory OC for R23 (which isn’t well known for scaling) and most higher-ranked players rely on BCLK OC just to gain a few more points. my setup runs continuously without interruption, and I think I could reach the top 10 again if I experimented with more aggressive clocks and timings that aren’t fully stable.