This processor offers a significant performance boost compared to the older i3-9100F.
This processor offers a significant performance boost compared to the older i3-9100F.
I assembled my system in January using an i3-9100f and GTX 1660 Super, which were intended to handle Modern Warfare and CS:GO. Those titles still function well, but streaming has become a priority. I’m considering upgrading the CPU now, though I’m uncertain if the i5-9400f will suffice. The i7-9700 offers more power for the extra $100, while waiting might be an option if prices drop further.
Absolutely! I regularly drive the 9400f, and it works well for all kinds of tasks.
The 9400f offers a solid improvement over the 9100f, but which board model are you using? For streaming, you can utilize nvec to move the processing to the CPU initially.
I’d choose the 9700f instead of the 9400f because you’re already making upgrades. The additional two threads would significantly boost performance during CPU-heavy games, and using NVENC for streaming would be beneficial if you haven’t done so yet. The 9400f remains a solid upgrade, but the 9700f is more comfortable if budget constraints are a concern.
Sure thing. It seems better to upgrade for the future. Using NVENC would help, and x.264 would really hurt performance. Even with the latest NVENC version, frame rates drop noticeably in games, which points to a clear CPU issue.
It also relies on your upgrade schedule. How frequently do you change your hardware? If you upgrade regularly, the i5 might be a better option since you’re likely to swap out the i7 before it’s fully needed for performance.