This processor isn't fast enough for 4K in a compact ITX case.
This processor isn't fast enough for 4K in a compact ITX case.
Thank you for the charts. I found it much simpler to understand and compare after checking benchmarks and examples on YouTube. Appreciate the help!
I’m focusing on balancing the costs between the main graphics card and the rest of the system. He’s investing heavily in a high-end GPU (2070S or 2080S) and case, while using ITX components he already owns. Since he’s committed to 4K resolution, I’m hoping this setup won’t be too taxing for his processor. The information shared suggests the 2200G was quite close to a 2600/2700x at 4K, which gives me confidence. This setup is really meant as an add-on for gaming, not a powerful workstation. He doesn’t need heavy multithreaded tasks, so it’s just a small addition to his existing PC. Unfortunately, the system he has is restricted—his work network PC can’t be changed or upgraded easily, which limits flexibility.
Sure thing, let's break this down. The comparison hinges on what you consider "far off." If a 2700X is the top speed before moving to a 3600X, then 2200G seems like a decent jump. It offers four cores with no extra threads—definitely a strong contender for high-end titles. The base clock sits around 3.5 GHz, and it tops out at about 3.7 GHz, giving you a solid 3.6 GHz boost across all four cores. Not bad for a mid-range option.
However, the performance isn't overwhelmingly impressive compared to the 2700X. All-core speeds are still around 400-600 MHz, which is slower than the 2700X's capabilities. If you're expecting similar quality silicon as the 2600X—which has hit a 4 GHz ceiling—2200G won't quite match that. It might not handle stable gaming past 3.8 to 3.9 GHz unless it's built on top of very capable hardware.
In short, 2200G is a solid choice for a powerful GPU, but it may fall short in the areas of CPU coordination and sustained high-frequency performance needed for top-tier gaming.
The alternative choice is straightforward—it’s simply inserting my 2700x without overcomplicating things. I was considering a higher value like 3900x, but my B450 board likely can’t handle it. Maybe sticking with the 2700x gives me more confidence.
Add a Ryzen 5 3600 and note that 2200G won’t suffice for your needs.
Sure, that works fine. If you don’t need the threads, just switch off the SMT—it won’t affect performance much. Most games won’t handle more than eight cores, which could save energy and cooling. It’ll make a solid gaming setup. 4K support is no problem here. Just clarify to him that 4K isn’t about high FPS and explain why it matters so he understands the difference. A lot of people get mixed up on this topic.
I believe my main worry was handling multiple threads with the upcoming console that has an 8-core CPU (plus the low clocks on the 2200g). I’m probably going to buy a decent 400$ 3900x and use the 2700x as a backup. Together they should handle it fine.