F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking This OC is secure and dependable, compatible with FX4170, GA-78LMT-usb3, and gtx-950.

This OC is secure and dependable, compatible with FX4170, GA-78LMT-usb3, and gtx-950.

This OC is secure and dependable, compatible with FX4170, GA-78LMT-usb3, and gtx-950.

U
united32
Senior Member
433
06-22-2016, 08:33 AM
#1
Attempting to determine the ideal long-term OC frequency for this configuration.

The components in use include an AMD FX-4170, Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 Rev 6.0, ADATA DDR3 RAM (possibly 1333), a Zotac GTX-950 (presumably with an OC variant noted), an H80i CPU with a watercooler, a Cooler Master Elite 431 Plus case packed with numerous fans, and a 800-watt PSU from 2010. The system currently runs well within temperature limits after installing the watercooling setup and additional fans.

I've experimented with OC settings ranging from 4.3 to 5.0, aiming not to push the hardware beyond its safe limits but rather to maximize performance sustainably over time. I'm seeking a BIOS version that offers stability, minimal failure risk, and maintains memory speed without degradation. This is running on Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit. I've encountered only one minor issue with USB 3.0 so far, so a BIOS update isn't necessary unless it affects USB functionality at startup.

For gaming system management, I'm considering using Corsair software for temperature monitoring and MSI's Afterburner for GPU performance tracking. These tools are already installed on the system. I'm open to other suggestions as well.

My background is in mechanical and computer engineering, but I haven't typically worked with advanced PC components or overclocking. I'm new to setting up gaming rigs and want to ensure this build will endure for the long term.

I've read that certain BIOS versions are more reliable and have lower failure rates without affecting memory speed. I'm open to any advice on selecting the best one for Windows 7 Home Premium.

Additionally, I'm curious about the recommended RAM speed for the GTX-950. Similar considerations apply regarding overclocking and utility tools for performance tuning. I suspect the current setup is adequate, but I'd like to confirm if the GTX-950 can safely run at its maximum settings.

Lastly, I'm willing to share my performance results before and after making changes, should that help others in their builds. The motherboard, processor, graphics card, and 8GB RAM were purchased for $250, so this appears to be a cost-effective project.
U
united32
06-22-2016, 08:33 AM #1

Attempting to determine the ideal long-term OC frequency for this configuration.

The components in use include an AMD FX-4170, Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 Rev 6.0, ADATA DDR3 RAM (possibly 1333), a Zotac GTX-950 (presumably with an OC variant noted), an H80i CPU with a watercooler, a Cooler Master Elite 431 Plus case packed with numerous fans, and a 800-watt PSU from 2010. The system currently runs well within temperature limits after installing the watercooling setup and additional fans.

I've experimented with OC settings ranging from 4.3 to 5.0, aiming not to push the hardware beyond its safe limits but rather to maximize performance sustainably over time. I'm seeking a BIOS version that offers stability, minimal failure risk, and maintains memory speed without degradation. This is running on Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit. I've encountered only one minor issue with USB 3.0 so far, so a BIOS update isn't necessary unless it affects USB functionality at startup.

For gaming system management, I'm considering using Corsair software for temperature monitoring and MSI's Afterburner for GPU performance tracking. These tools are already installed on the system. I'm open to other suggestions as well.

My background is in mechanical and computer engineering, but I haven't typically worked with advanced PC components or overclocking. I'm new to setting up gaming rigs and want to ensure this build will endure for the long term.

I've read that certain BIOS versions are more reliable and have lower failure rates without affecting memory speed. I'm open to any advice on selecting the best one for Windows 7 Home Premium.

Additionally, I'm curious about the recommended RAM speed for the GTX-950. Similar considerations apply regarding overclocking and utility tools for performance tuning. I suspect the current setup is adequate, but I'd like to confirm if the GTX-950 can safely run at its maximum settings.

Lastly, I'm willing to share my performance results before and after making changes, should that help others in their builds. The motherboard, processor, graphics card, and 8GB RAM were purchased for $250, so this appears to be a cost-effective project.

K
KeemiX
Junior Member
39
06-27-2016, 03:22 AM
#2
There is a sweet-spot but this purely depends on your CPU die (bit of a lottery...).
Ideally you want to keep the temps down (no problem with your cooling system there)
And the voltage to the lowest possible amount with a stable overclock <- sweetspot to find.
Remember it isn't just temperatures that matter, if you add more voltage but keep temps down, you can still reach an unstable temps on the inside and cause permanent damager after a shortwhile.
Try the highest, stable overclock for your stock voltage first, then increase the voltage by the smallest amount.
The rest depends on the chip and, unless you are looking to break records, a 10% increase from stock is considered pretty good.
Now this will depend on your specific chip...
K
KeemiX
06-27-2016, 03:22 AM #2

There is a sweet-spot but this purely depends on your CPU die (bit of a lottery...).
Ideally you want to keep the temps down (no problem with your cooling system there)
And the voltage to the lowest possible amount with a stable overclock <- sweetspot to find.
Remember it isn't just temperatures that matter, if you add more voltage but keep temps down, you can still reach an unstable temps on the inside and cause permanent damager after a shortwhile.
Try the highest, stable overclock for your stock voltage first, then increase the voltage by the smallest amount.
The rest depends on the chip and, unless you are looking to break records, a 10% increase from stock is considered pretty good.
Now this will depend on your specific chip...

D
DoodyMon
Member
55
06-27-2016, 07:30 AM
#3
There is a sweet-spot but this purely depends on your CPU die (bit of a lottery...).
Ideally you want to keep the temps down (no problem with your cooling system there)
And the voltage to the lowest possible amount with a stable overclock <- sweetspot to find.
Remember it isn't just temperatures that matter, if you add more voltage but keep temps down, you can still reach an unstable temps on the inside and cause permanent damager after a shortwhile.
Try the highest, stable overclock for your stock voltage first, then increase the voltage by the smallest amount.
The rest depends on the chip and, unless you are looking to break records, a 10% increase from stock is considered pretty good.
Now this will depend on your specific chip, which I do not have, so that is the reason for the vague response.
Hopefully someone with a bit more experience overclocking those components will be able to help better than me.
D
DoodyMon
06-27-2016, 07:30 AM #3

There is a sweet-spot but this purely depends on your CPU die (bit of a lottery...).
Ideally you want to keep the temps down (no problem with your cooling system there)
And the voltage to the lowest possible amount with a stable overclock <- sweetspot to find.
Remember it isn't just temperatures that matter, if you add more voltage but keep temps down, you can still reach an unstable temps on the inside and cause permanent damager after a shortwhile.
Try the highest, stable overclock for your stock voltage first, then increase the voltage by the smallest amount.
The rest depends on the chip and, unless you are looking to break records, a 10% increase from stock is considered pretty good.
Now this will depend on your specific chip, which I do not have, so that is the reason for the vague response.
Hopefully someone with a bit more experience overclocking those components will be able to help better than me.