F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks This model supports only up to 200Mbps speeds.

This model supports only up to 200Mbps speeds.

This model supports only up to 200Mbps speeds.

X
Xxshalevop
Member
193
03-13-2019, 12:06 PM
#1
Hello everyone, I set up a few Ubiquiti WiFi 6 Long Range and Lite Access Points around my home. After configuration, I noticed speeds ranging from 200Mbps to 300Mbps. I used the default or auto settings, but they don’t seem to reach 500Mbps+—which matches my internet connection speed. I ran an environment scan (refer to the photo), and it seems there might be too much congestion on channel 48. However, I’m not sure about the interference since 5GHz networks shouldn’t cause issues there. I also tested speeds using a 5GHz network, but I’m still unsure what’s causing the limitation. Since I’m new to this equipment, it could be something I overlooked.
X
Xxshalevop
03-13-2019, 12:06 PM #1

Hello everyone, I set up a few Ubiquiti WiFi 6 Long Range and Lite Access Points around my home. After configuration, I noticed speeds ranging from 200Mbps to 300Mbps. I used the default or auto settings, but they don’t seem to reach 500Mbps+—which matches my internet connection speed. I ran an environment scan (refer to the photo), and it seems there might be too much congestion on channel 48. However, I’m not sure about the interference since 5GHz networks shouldn’t cause issues there. I also tested speeds using a 5GHz network, but I’m still unsure what’s causing the limitation. Since I’m new to this equipment, it could be something I overlooked.

X
xAdriLCT
Senior Member
702
03-13-2019, 12:16 PM
#2
Are they operating while it looks blank on channel 48? What I see are Band C and many clients won’t catch them since they were certified only when Band C was exclusive, and they don’t want the cost of re-licensing now. Band C is free in some regions. The best way to confirm is to assign different SSIDs to the 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz radios, making it clear which frequency you’re using. I’d assume 200-300Mbit means you’re on 2.4Ghz with strong performance because interference is minimal.
X
xAdriLCT
03-13-2019, 12:16 PM #2

Are they operating while it looks blank on channel 48? What I see are Band C and many clients won’t catch them since they were certified only when Band C was exclusive, and they don’t want the cost of re-licensing now. Band C is free in some regions. The best way to confirm is to assign different SSIDs to the 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz radios, making it clear which frequency you’re using. I’d assume 200-300Mbit means you’re on 2.4Ghz with strong performance because interference is minimal.

B
Blacknight123
Junior Member
48
03-17-2019, 04:16 PM
#3
I noticed my connection was a bit sluggish; increasing the 5GHz channel width might help. Give it a try!
B
Blacknight123
03-17-2019, 04:16 PM #3

I noticed my connection was a bit sluggish; increasing the 5GHz channel width might help. Give it a try!

S
SuperMarioDXB
Member
243
03-18-2019, 04:59 PM
#4
Also, for something around 800Mbit, you probably require a 80Mhz channel width. In certain cases, some clients even needed 160Mhz, even though 80Mhz seemed sufficient.
S
SuperMarioDXB
03-18-2019, 04:59 PM #4

Also, for something around 800Mbit, you probably require a 80Mhz channel width. In certain cases, some clients even needed 160Mhz, even though 80Mhz seemed sufficient.

T
Toodaloo_246
Senior Member
439
03-19-2019, 02:21 AM
#5
This change from 40Mhz to 80Mhz boosted my speed from 200Mbps to 300Mbps, and pushing it to 160Mhz reached up to 400Mbps across two walls. Edit: The 400Mbps result was just a coincidence. I repeated the test and it returned to 300Mbps. Disappointing.
T
Toodaloo_246
03-19-2019, 02:21 AM #5

This change from 40Mhz to 80Mhz boosted my speed from 200Mbps to 300Mbps, and pushing it to 160Mhz reached up to 400Mbps across two walls. Edit: The 400Mbps result was just a coincidence. I repeated the test and it returned to 300Mbps. Disappointing.

Y
YADUP31
Junior Member
25
03-26-2019, 07:16 PM
#6
You asked about the client you're targeting.
Y
YADUP31
03-26-2019, 07:16 PM #6

You asked about the client you're targeting.

M
mqrcky
Junior Member
29
03-28-2019, 06:06 PM
#7
Apple's latest devices include the iPhone 13 Pro and the M1 MacBook Pro.
M
mqrcky
03-28-2019, 06:06 PM #7

Apple's latest devices include the iPhone 13 Pro and the M1 MacBook Pro.

L
LucyGames_YT
Junior Member
13
03-28-2019, 11:33 PM
#8
I understand Apple doesn't support 160Mhz, which could affect performance. Wider channel widths tend to cause issues at distance. You said you tried passing through two walls—did you also use the same room as the access point? Losing half your speed or more through walls isn’t uncommon.
L
LucyGames_YT
03-28-2019, 11:33 PM #8

I understand Apple doesn't support 160Mhz, which could affect performance. Wider channel widths tend to cause issues at distance. You said you tried passing through two walls—did you also use the same room as the access point? Losing half your speed or more through walls isn’t uncommon.

D
domm0nkey
Member
154
03-29-2019, 01:21 AM
#9
I experimented with the channel settings a bit and it functioned properly. Now I’m experiencing 500Mbps+ speeds even when a few feet away from the access points. There’s this strange problem on my IoT network too. My Google Nest Hub generates random MAC addresses—so far three have appeared... I’ve cleared them by hitting "forget," but they reappear instantly. No data is passing through it either.
D
domm0nkey
03-29-2019, 01:21 AM #9

I experimented with the channel settings a bit and it functioned properly. Now I’m experiencing 500Mbps+ speeds even when a few feet away from the access points. There’s this strange problem on my IoT network too. My Google Nest Hub generates random MAC addresses—so far three have appeared... I’ve cleared them by hitting "forget," but they reappear instantly. No data is passing through it either.