F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking This i7-4790k model consumes a lot of power.

This i7-4790k model consumes a lot of power.

This i7-4790k model consumes a lot of power.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
S
Spartan_122
Junior Member
Find
9
06-01-2016, 02:04 AM
#11
Notes:
My [email protected]@1.32V reaches 160 watts with prime95. It stays comfortably under 80°C on the cores. I could try [email protected], but then I switched to a mini ITX board and it didn’t work. Even with a proper loop, I’m still using the most "unproper" one at the moment. 240 rad on intake, and since I like it well, I’m using NF-P12 fans up to 1300RPM. 120 rad on the exhaust—that’s quite hot for the intake. Even with both prime95 and heat sinks together, the temps stay within a reasonable range.

I once tested my CPU and initially used MX-4, but later experimented with Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut (liquid metal) after a GPU power upgrade. The results weren’t very different.

So it seems the cooling issue isn’t about the fan itself—it’s likely related to the motherboard settings or the CPU. Probably a defective board or incorrect configuration.

P.S.
Corsair fans are not up to the task. They’re just marketing fluff. Not comparable to Noctua, especially for long-term use. Thanks for the info, n0ns3ns3.

I’m pretty sure the problem lies in the motherboard settings; the fan speed controller is definitely the culprit. Lowering it should fix it.

Also, I think Corsair fans are poor quality. I only have them temporarily and won’t keep them for a proper loop. I might try Noctua or Cougar Vortex later, but testing them under static pressure would be necessary before committing.

I also agree the Corsair fans are subpar. I had them recently and don’t plan to use them in a serious loop. I could test some Noctua or Cougar Vortex sooner, especially if pushing over 900RPM with a push-pull setup, as the top Corsair models make strange resonance sounds at high speeds.
Reply
Reply
S
Spartan_122
06-01-2016, 02:04 AM #11

Notes:
My [email protected]@1.32V reaches 160 watts with prime95. It stays comfortably under 80°C on the cores. I could try [email protected], but then I switched to a mini ITX board and it didn’t work. Even with a proper loop, I’m still using the most "unproper" one at the moment. 240 rad on intake, and since I like it well, I’m using NF-P12 fans up to 1300RPM. 120 rad on the exhaust—that’s quite hot for the intake. Even with both prime95 and heat sinks together, the temps stay within a reasonable range.

I once tested my CPU and initially used MX-4, but later experimented with Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut (liquid metal) after a GPU power upgrade. The results weren’t very different.

So it seems the cooling issue isn’t about the fan itself—it’s likely related to the motherboard settings or the CPU. Probably a defective board or incorrect configuration.

P.S.
Corsair fans are not up to the task. They’re just marketing fluff. Not comparable to Noctua, especially for long-term use. Thanks for the info, n0ns3ns3.

I’m pretty sure the problem lies in the motherboard settings; the fan speed controller is definitely the culprit. Lowering it should fix it.

Also, I think Corsair fans are poor quality. I only have them temporarily and won’t keep them for a proper loop. I might try Noctua or Cougar Vortex later, but testing them under static pressure would be necessary before committing.

I also agree the Corsair fans are subpar. I had them recently and don’t plan to use them in a serious loop. I could test some Noctua or Cougar Vortex sooner, especially if pushing over 900RPM with a push-pull setup, as the top Corsair models make strange resonance sounds at high speeds.

Reply
Reply
K
kaleb85
Member
Find
56
06-01-2016, 02:38 AM
#12
Wattage can't be measured precisely with software. That's why reviewers never use it for this.
I'm starting to grasp this.
I think I'll need a good meter and test it at the measuring points on the motherboard. At least this one has them!
😉
Reply
Reply
K
kaleb85
06-01-2016, 02:38 AM #12

Wattage can't be measured precisely with software. That's why reviewers never use it for this.
I'm starting to grasp this.
I think I'll need a good meter and test it at the measuring points on the motherboard. At least this one has them!
😉

Reply
Reply
A
alan0621
Member
Find
212
06-01-2016, 06:33 AM
#13
Dom_79 replied to KeelinTy with their experience and concerns about performance adjustments.
Reply
Reply
A
alan0621
06-01-2016, 06:33 AM #13

Dom_79 replied to KeelinTy with their experience and concerns about performance adjustments.

Reply
Reply
M
Mickael_Park
Member
Find
216
06-01-2016, 10:02 AM
#14
Dom_79's response indicates they find it difficult for software to accurately measure wattage and suggest using a proper meter instead. They plan to test at the motherboard's measurement points and note that this board has them available. The tone remains casual and slightly frustrated.
Reply
Reply
M
Mickael_Park
06-01-2016, 10:02 AM #14

Dom_79's response indicates they find it difficult for software to accurately measure wattage and suggest using a proper meter instead. They plan to test at the motherboard's measurement points and note that this board has them available. The tone remains casual and slightly frustrated.

Reply
Reply
_
_ImDustin
Member
Find
230
06-01-2016, 10:37 AM
#15
It looks like a waste of effort if the PC is functioning properly. I think I should use my setup in a different way than yours. Using all this equipment without purpose doesn't seem worthwhile.
Reply
Reply
_
_ImDustin
06-01-2016, 10:37 AM #15

It looks like a waste of effort if the PC is functioning properly. I think I should use my setup in a different way than yours. Using all this equipment without purpose doesn't seem worthwhile.

Reply
Reply
Pages (2): Previous 1 2