Thinking about getting an i5 4690k and checking if overclocking is feasible with your current cooler.
Thinking about getting an i5 4690k and checking if overclocking is feasible with your current cooler.
RustyRagdoll :
MRBANG1 :
If the multiplier can be adjusted, then 4.0 Ghz should be manageable. Your CPU already boosts at 3.9 Ghz, so it’s almost there.
Thanks for the reply.
Regarding your questions, if the cooler maintains good temperatures after the overclock, what are your thoughts?
Also, what’s the estimated maximum frequency you’d expect with your B85 chip?
The upper limit is mostly dependent on the CPU. Since your chip already reaches 3.9, I’d assume the CPU would push it to at least 4.0.
However, your motherboard’s VRMs weren’t built for overclocking even after the BIOS update. I’m not saying you won’t hit 4.2, but a solid motherboard is important for stable clocks.
Your cooler should handle the overclock easily. Don’t worry about it.
Feelinfroggy777 :
RustyRagdoll :
MRBANG1 :
If you adjust the multiplier, a 4.0 Ghz should be manageable. Your CPU is already running at 3.9 Ghz, so it’s close enough.
Thanks for the reply.
Regarding your concerns, if the cooler handles the temperatures after overclocking, what are your thoughts?
Also, what frequency do you think you could achieve with your B85 chip?
The maximum frequency mainly depends on the CPU. Since your chip already turbo to 3.9, I expect it to reach at least 4.0.
However, your motherboard’s VRMs weren’t built for overclocking even after the BIOS update. I’m not saying you won’t hit 4.2, but a good motherboard also plays a big role in stable clocks.
Your cooler should be fine for this overclock. Don’t worry about it.
Alright, thanks for the advice.
But would you really get a stable 4.0Ghz without any issues?
I’m thinking of keeping it at 4.0Ghz (maybe 4.1Ghz if possible) and setting the base clock to 3.0Ghz if that’s feasible.
RustyRagdoll shared feedback on overclocking possibilities. MRBANG1 suggested that adjusting the multiplier would make a 4.0 Ghz overclock feasible, noting the CPU already runs at 3.9 Ghz and is close to the target. The response also asked for opinions on achieving stable temperatures with a cooler after the boost and inquired about the maximum frequency achievable with the B85 chip. The original replied that the chip can likely reach 4.0 Ghz, emphasizing the importance of a good motherboard and cooler for stability, while reassuring that overclocking is possible without major issues.
Feelinfroggy777 asked about the feasibility of a 4.0Ghz overclock and sought advice on cooler temperatures and maximum frequency with the B85 chip. They mentioned they already have a CPU turbo at 3.9Ghz and were curious about the impact of a cooler and the motherboard's role in stability. They also wanted to know if they could realistically reach 4.0Ghz without instability and what the expected boost would be.
RustyRagdoll shared several points in discussion. They mentioned that if the multiplier can be adjusted, a 4.0 Ghz overclock should be feasible. The CPU is already running at 3.9 Ghz, so it’s close to the target. They appreciated the response and asked about the expected maximum frequency with their B85 chip. They noted that the CPU already boosts to 3.9 and would likely reach at least 4.0 if the cooler performs well. They also pointed out that the motherboard VRMs weren’t built for overclocking, though they acknowledged it’s possible to reach 4.2 with a good board. The cooler should handle the overclock without issues.
They asked whether achieving a 4.0Ghz overclock without instability was realistic and suggested aiming for 4.0Ghz (possibly 4.1Ghz) with a base clock of 3.0Ghz. They expected around 4Ghz but admitted uncertainty due to exceeding the chip’s tolerance. They noted that boosting the chip by 3.9Ghz would only add about 3% to the boost, so they wouldn’t expect much more.
They clarified that changing the base clock isn’t possible and that setting the chip to run at 4Ghz would require a 4Ghz base clock. They also mentioned considering a 4690K chip for its affordability and solid overclock performance, especially with a cooler like the Aidos. They referenced a review and noted that smaller coolers like the Aidos outperform larger ones in both stock and overclock scenarios.
I’d save a few dollars and pick the 4690 if it’s in stock and cheaper. My 4690K can easily reach 4.4GHz with an 212 Evo cooler, but after that it gets more complicated to overclock. That setup is built on a Z97 board that was made for OC work, with passive coolers and all the necessary components for an overclock-friendly design. Check your CPU’s cooling options—look for any coolers or mention of reinforced parts in the manual. This suggests you shouldn’t overclock it unless you’re certain.
I also noticed my motherboard has a medium-sized ASUS passive cooler, so I’m not sure. (https://www.asus.com/media/global/produc...nd_500.png)
Some components on the box and spec sheet are:
- Capacitors that are 2.5 times stronger than standard
- I/O parts that are three times more robust
- Also includes “tons” of overcurrent protection...
I would consider saving a few dollars and opt for the 4690 if it's in stock and cheaper. My 4690K can be overclocked up to 4.4GHz, supported by an 212 Evo cooler, but after that it gets more complicated. This setup is built on a Z97 board that was designed with overclocking in mind, featuring passive coolers and sufficient power supply. Check your CPU for any cooling units—this indicates you shouldn’t overclock it further.
I also noticed your motherboard has reinforced components listed in the manual and specs: stronger capacitors (2.5x), I/O modules (3x stronger), and multiple overcurrent protection features. I saw your board when I replied, which includes a passive cooler for the southbridge. I recommend focusing on your CPU and VRMs—more power through them means more cooling needs.
There are key differences between your board and mine: your board has a 4-pin CPU connector (sometimes called an EPS 12V socket) and an 8-pin connector, suggesting OC isn’t advised. Your board offers better power delivery and cooling compared to mine.