These tests may not reflect real-world performance on modern systems.
These tests may not reflect real-world performance on modern systems.
The Aida64 delivers accurate figures on W10 but mysterious L1-L3 cache outcomes on W11. Why? Edit: odd fact—W11 uses a higher north bridge frequency (3.6GHz) compared to W10’s 2.6GHz. I ran tests in just minutes. 10: Spoiler 11: Spoiler
Discovered that targeting Hyper-V and its tools can yield authentic outcomes. Also noticed the advantage of turning off "Core Isolation" in Windows configurations. Other tests, such as 3DMark, seem to perform better afterward.
The updated version of Aida is ready, seems like the issue has been resolved.
Does this seem exclusive to Intel? I'm curious—could it really improve my performance?