F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop These processors aren't ideal for gaming machines.

These processors aren't ideal for gaming machines.

These processors aren't ideal for gaming machines.

T
TruZZted
Junior Member
26
09-22-2016, 10:34 AM
#1
Hi everyone! So sort of a stupid question, however.... My current desktop is an MSI Z270A-Pro with an i5-6600k. The CPU is borderline useless for gaming. I was planning to upgrade to a RyZen 3 system this year, but due to the current situation in the world, I probably won't have the money for the upgrade this year. However, I do have a Asus Z9PR-D12 with 2 x's Xeon E5-2650 v2 and 64gb DDR3 ECC memory. The board would be a bit of a downgrade, no onboard M.2 and a slower memory bandwidth. On the plus side, each CPU has 8 cores plus hyperthreading. So, any thoughts? Should I stick with the i5 or swap boards. Please keep in mind that this would be for gamming purposes, other, the board and proc are "fine": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt9RPv_HIfE Yep, that pretty much describes my system right now!
T
TruZZted
09-22-2016, 10:34 AM #1

Hi everyone! So sort of a stupid question, however.... My current desktop is an MSI Z270A-Pro with an i5-6600k. The CPU is borderline useless for gaming. I was planning to upgrade to a RyZen 3 system this year, but due to the current situation in the world, I probably won't have the money for the upgrade this year. However, I do have a Asus Z9PR-D12 with 2 x's Xeon E5-2650 v2 and 64gb DDR3 ECC memory. The board would be a bit of a downgrade, no onboard M.2 and a slower memory bandwidth. On the plus side, each CPU has 8 cores plus hyperthreading. So, any thoughts? Should I stick with the i5 or swap boards. Please keep in mind that this would be for gamming purposes, other, the board and proc are "fine": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt9RPv_HIfE Yep, that pretty much describes my system right now!

A
anemto
Member
132
09-24-2016, 03:56 AM
#2
Stick to the i5; it’s not completely worthless either. Who said otherwise?
A
anemto
09-24-2016, 03:56 AM #2

Stick to the i5; it’s not completely worthless either. Who said otherwise?

S
SirKumsishon
Senior Member
257
09-25-2016, 04:17 PM
#3
Thanks for the update @FloRolf Err. The games I'm attempting are indicating this pattern. My CPU hits 100% while my GPU stays at 50-60% in Wolfenstein - The New Order. Other titles are behaving similarly, with Shadow of the Tomb Raider stressing my CPU as well. I've adjusted settings to lower levels, but my CPU remains consistently at full capacity across all cores. My cooling system is effective, keeping CPU temps near 45-55°C and GPU around 65°C, which gives me confidence thermal throttling isn't the issue.
S
SirKumsishon
09-25-2016, 04:17 PM #3

Thanks for the update @FloRolf Err. The games I'm attempting are indicating this pattern. My CPU hits 100% while my GPU stays at 50-60% in Wolfenstein - The New Order. Other titles are behaving similarly, with Shadow of the Tomb Raider stressing my CPU as well. I've adjusted settings to lower levels, but my CPU remains consistently at full capacity across all cores. My cooling system is effective, keeping CPU temps near 45-55°C and GPU around 65°C, which gives me confidence thermal throttling isn't the issue.

X
xStriKed
Member
212
09-27-2016, 10:18 AM
#4
The problem lies with the older, slower cores and the extra ones added. The CPU alone won’t make a difference.
X
xStriKed
09-27-2016, 10:18 AM #4

The problem lies with the older, slower cores and the extra ones added. The CPU alone won’t make a difference.

C
calbear86
Member
156
09-27-2016, 12:16 PM
#5
Do you have sufficient frame rate? When it works well, the GPU performance isn't the only factor—GPU settings can still improve quality. I've seen used Intel quad processors dropping in price; if they're affordable, a 6700(k) could be worth considering, though avoid overspending. Dual Xeons aren't ideal for gaming, possibly slowing things down rather than helping. A single Xeon might offer some benefit, especially for newer titles that favor overall CPU speed over many cores at high frequencies. If both systems are functional now, try swapping the GPU to see if it makes a difference.
C
calbear86
09-27-2016, 12:16 PM #5

Do you have sufficient frame rate? When it works well, the GPU performance isn't the only factor—GPU settings can still improve quality. I've seen used Intel quad processors dropping in price; if they're affordable, a 6700(k) could be worth considering, though avoid overspending. Dual Xeons aren't ideal for gaming, possibly slowing things down rather than helping. A single Xeon might offer some benefit, especially for newer titles that favor overall CPU speed over many cores at high frequencies. If both systems are functional now, try swapping the GPU to see if it makes a difference.

B
BaccaStrq123
Senior Member
664
10-03-2016, 08:28 PM
#6
@porina, I was considering switching to an i7-6700. They’re about $200 USD. If I spend a bit more, I could get a Ryzen 5 3500X. That’s my choice now—I’m torn between upgrading the CPU or moving forward with a new system. I’m also hoping for another stimulus payment in the US since I’m a dual citizen. Thanks for your advice! zog
B
BaccaStrq123
10-03-2016, 08:28 PM #6

@porina, I was considering switching to an i7-6700. They’re about $200 USD. If I spend a bit more, I could get a Ryzen 5 3500X. That’s my choice now—I’m torn between upgrading the CPU or moving forward with a new system. I’m also hoping for another stimulus payment in the US since I’m a dual citizen. Thanks for your advice! zog