F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop These models are compatible with the X99 server/vm host.

These models are compatible with the X99 server/vm host.

These models are compatible with the X99 server/vm host.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
L
ladymorepork
Posting Freak
791
03-09-2016, 03:59 PM
#1
I discovered a solid offer for a 2680v4 and a board (X99-AD4), but the seller now lists a 2696v3 instead. I'm torn between the two, weighing 18 cores against power efficiency. The first model supports DDR4 2400, while the second requires 2133.
L
ladymorepork
03-09-2016, 03:59 PM #1

I discovered a solid offer for a 2680v4 and a board (X99-AD4), but the seller now lists a 2696v3 instead. I'm torn between the two, weighing 18 cores against power efficiency. The first model supports DDR4 2400, while the second requires 2133.

G
Griinor
Member
54
03-09-2016, 09:25 PM
#2
What amount is being discussed? Which scenario applies? Remember, the term 'vm host' refers to the workload being considered. Be aware these aren't energy-saving solutions. The board you mentioned usually lasts only a few months at most.
G
Griinor
03-09-2016, 09:25 PM #2

What amount is being discussed? Which scenario applies? Remember, the term 'vm host' refers to the workload being considered. Be aware these aren't energy-saving solutions. The board you mentioned usually lasts only a few months at most.

K
KaisSou
Member
52
03-10-2016, 05:18 AM
#3
among those options, I'd pick 2680v4 since core count isn't the only factor on the server side. Around that generation there should be a noticeable improvement in performance per core, which might not justify those extra cores. Still, you can get entire servers from this generation for a few hundred dollars, so you need a good deal to justify the investment. On the other hand, if you're working on a homelab and don't need a lot of PCIe bandwidth, you can achieve impressive results with older desktop parts.
K
KaisSou
03-10-2016, 05:18 AM #3

among those options, I'd pick 2680v4 since core count isn't the only factor on the server side. Around that generation there should be a noticeable improvement in performance per core, which might not justify those extra cores. Still, you can get entire servers from this generation for a few hundred dollars, so you need a good deal to justify the investment. On the other hand, if you're working on a homelab and don't need a lot of PCIe bandwidth, you can achieve impressive results with older desktop parts.

D
DuckManWoo
Member
103
03-11-2016, 09:23 PM
#4
I understand the value of these components clearly.
D
DuckManWoo
03-11-2016, 09:23 PM #4

I understand the value of these components clearly.

P
Pickkson
Member
174
03-12-2016, 05:16 AM
#5
It's fine if you already possess the necessary components. Otherwise, a workstation or server matching comparable specifications would be preferable, as these are typically constructed from higher-quality hardware.
P
Pickkson
03-12-2016, 05:16 AM #5

It's fine if you already possess the necessary components. Otherwise, a workstation or server matching comparable specifications would be preferable, as these are typically constructed from higher-quality hardware.

M
Mikeahl
Member
196
03-12-2016, 06:46 AM
#6
Is 3.8GHz really enough for your needs? You might consider adjusting cores based on tasks—like lowering to 8 cores for better performance similar to a Zen 1 chip.
M
Mikeahl
03-12-2016, 06:46 AM #6

Is 3.8GHz really enough for your needs? You might consider adjusting cores based on tasks—like lowering to 8 cores for better performance similar to a Zen 1 chip.

D
DakaanyGamer_
Member
66
03-14-2016, 05:13 PM
#7
D
DakaanyGamer_
03-14-2016, 05:13 PM #7

F
firemanshunny
Member
51
04-02-2016, 09:23 AM
#8
The choice really hinges on your goals. For a current HEDT setup, using X570 with 5950x works well compared to older components. If extra bandwidth isn't critical, consider TR4. ECC support is available on X570 and 5950x while maintaining strong performance. A 16-core/32-core Zen3 core allocation is sufficient for most virtual machines you mentioned. Memory configuration matters less unless your workload demands it; otherwise, a newer platform would be more efficient.
F
firemanshunny
04-02-2016, 09:23 AM #8

The choice really hinges on your goals. For a current HEDT setup, using X570 with 5950x works well compared to older components. If extra bandwidth isn't critical, consider TR4. ECC support is available on X570 and 5950x while maintaining strong performance. A 16-core/32-core Zen3 core allocation is sufficient for most virtual machines you mentioned. Memory configuration matters less unless your workload demands it; otherwise, a newer platform would be more efficient.

P
184
04-07-2016, 08:10 AM
#9
It speeds up individual cores more effectively. Fewer active cores use less energy, resulting in cooler temperatures. The rest of the cores won’t slow down as much.
P
PickleSauce300
04-07-2016, 08:10 AM #9

It speeds up individual cores more effectively. Fewer active cores use less energy, resulting in cooler temperatures. The rest of the cores won’t slow down as much.

O
OffsetBadge
Member
191
04-08-2016, 01:50 PM
#10
With sufficient cooling, disabling cores is unnecessary.
O
OffsetBadge
04-08-2016, 01:50 PM #10

With sufficient cooling, disabling cores is unnecessary.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next