F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop The X3D chiplet on the 7950X3D offers a more optimized overall performance compared to the 7800X3D.

The X3D chiplet on the 7950X3D offers a more optimized overall performance compared to the 7800X3D.

The X3D chiplet on the 7950X3D offers a more optimized overall performance compared to the 7800X3D.

S
SSynoTex
Junior Member
31
08-09-2023, 08:43 PM
#1
I understand that on the 12 and 16 core versions, at least one chiplet was more effectively grouped than on the 6 and 8 core models with Ryzen 5000 and 7000 series. Do you think this pattern continues for the 3D cache chiplet? Would it be accurate to assume that turning off non-3D chiplets would yield better performance, cooler operation, and higher efficiency compared to a 7800X3D? Are you sure about the idea that disabling CCD1 makes the 7950X3D behave like a 7800X3D with improved binning? And according to TechPowerUp, when CCD0 is disabled it appears to become a 7700X which might be less well-binned—your observation seems supported.
S
SSynoTex
08-09-2023, 08:43 PM #1

I understand that on the 12 and 16 core versions, at least one chiplet was more effectively grouped than on the 6 and 8 core models with Ryzen 5000 and 7000 series. Do you think this pattern continues for the 3D cache chiplet? Would it be accurate to assume that turning off non-3D chiplets would yield better performance, cooler operation, and higher efficiency compared to a 7800X3D? Are you sure about the idea that disabling CCD1 makes the 7950X3D behave like a 7800X3D with improved binning? And according to TechPowerUp, when CCD0 is disabled it appears to become a 7700X which might be less well-binned—your observation seems supported.

M
MichaelFW
Member
171
08-11-2023, 05:18 AM
#2
the goal was indeed to combine 3D and non-3D cores, which caused 3D cores to perform more slowly due to the 3D cache. also, meaningful comparison required analyzing multiple samples rather than just a single review against another.
M
MichaelFW
08-11-2023, 05:18 AM #2

the goal was indeed to combine 3D and non-3D cores, which caused 3D cores to perform more slowly due to the 3D cache. also, meaningful comparison required analyzing multiple samples rather than just a single review against another.

M
51
08-15-2023, 05:13 AM
#3
Certainly VCache CPUs operate more slowly because the cache generates additional heat. The analysis focuses on clock speeds and power usage comparing 8-core VCache versus VCache chiplet on the 7950X3D and 7800X3D chips. This isn't a direct match to other non-3D cache solutions, which typically run faster but deliver poorer performance across all games.
M
Mushroombowl05
08-15-2023, 05:13 AM #3

Certainly VCache CPUs operate more slowly because the cache generates additional heat. The analysis focuses on clock speeds and power usage comparing 8-core VCache versus VCache chiplet on the 7950X3D and 7800X3D chips. This isn't a direct match to other non-3D cache solutions, which typically run faster but deliver poorer performance across all games.