F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking The voltage is stabilizing around my CPU following the overclocking process.

The voltage is stabilizing around my CPU following the overclocking process.

The voltage is stabilizing around my CPU following the overclocking process.

F
flyer78
Senior Member
425
09-28-2016, 09:32 PM
#1
Hello everyone, I'm having issues with my Pentium G3258. I want to overclock it, aiming for at least 4.3GHz, but ideally up to 4.5GHz. However, my voltage keeps limiting itself until a blue screen appears. Even when I increase the voltage, it takes longer to reach the blue screen. The blue screen also happens randomly, regardless of whether the system is idle, under stress, during gaming, or anything else. Additionally, my motherboard is an MSI Gaming 5, and the voltages I've been using have ranged from about 1,250V to 1,380V. It seems that higher voltages take longer to trigger the blue screen.
F
flyer78
09-28-2016, 09:32 PM #1

Hello everyone, I'm having issues with my Pentium G3258. I want to overclock it, aiming for at least 4.3GHz, but ideally up to 4.5GHz. However, my voltage keeps limiting itself until a blue screen appears. Even when I increase the voltage, it takes longer to reach the blue screen. The blue screen also happens randomly, regardless of whether the system is idle, under stress, during gaming, or anything else. Additionally, my motherboard is an MSI Gaming 5, and the voltages I've been using have ranged from about 1,250V to 1,380V. It seems that higher voltages take longer to trigger the blue screen.

D
DarkSkullYT
Junior Member
33
10-06-2016, 09:18 AM
#2
every chip depends on the draw of the random number generator. thus, stability at [email protected] (with bios set) is maintained. when executing prime95(26.6 small fft), realtemp and hwmonitor display your maximum core temperatures along with cpu vcore values expected to be. many chips show up to a 0.100v vcore variation. however, i’m confident the next person running their g3258 at [email protected] will also reach similar core temperatures. keep in mind these readings are calibrated sensors and aren’t entirely accurate. for precise vcore measurement, you’ll need a multimeter to check your motherboard directly. i’ve seen some discussions about this topic before.
D
DarkSkullYT
10-06-2016, 09:18 AM #2

every chip depends on the draw of the random number generator. thus, stability at [email protected] (with bios set) is maintained. when executing prime95(26.6 small fft), realtemp and hwmonitor display your maximum core temperatures along with cpu vcore values expected to be. many chips show up to a 0.100v vcore variation. however, i’m confident the next person running their g3258 at [email protected] will also reach similar core temperatures. keep in mind these readings are calibrated sensors and aren’t entirely accurate. for precise vcore measurement, you’ll need a multimeter to check your motherboard directly. i’ve seen some discussions about this topic before.

R
RonniMolo4ko_
Member
172
10-06-2016, 02:46 PM
#3
what voltage configuration are you using, a fixed core voltage or dynamic adjustment?
R
RonniMolo4ko_
10-06-2016, 02:46 PM #3

what voltage configuration are you using, a fixed core voltage or dynamic adjustment?

L
LeachyBella
Junior Member
43
10-07-2016, 04:43 PM
#4
well... i can't be sure since i didn't see dynamic vcore anywhere, just like this one.
http://puu.sh/kvylk/38c90cad3d.png
i also tried overclocking in bios, same outcome, even the auto overclock feature from msi called oc genie seems to be the name i remember, but i can't recall it. no difference.
L
LeachyBella
10-07-2016, 04:43 PM #4

well... i can't be sure since i didn't see dynamic vcore anywhere, just like this one.
http://puu.sh/kvylk/38c90cad3d.png
i also tried overclocking in bios, same outcome, even the auto overclock feature from msi called oc genie seems to be the name i remember, but i can't recall it. no difference.

C
coolness2001
Member
224
10-08-2016, 03:30 PM
#5
I'm a bit unsure about this, but I'm not sure what to do here. I check if editing the dynamic vcore would help instead of the regular one. Also, I believe it began when I installed Windows 10 from scratch (clean install). Before that, with Windows 7, I was using Auto-Overclock and it managed to get it to run at around 4,3GHz without any issues or blue screens.
C
coolness2001
10-08-2016, 03:30 PM #5

I'm a bit unsure about this, but I'm not sure what to do here. I check if editing the dynamic vcore would help instead of the regular one. Also, I believe it began when I installed Windows 10 from scratch (clean install). Before that, with Windows 7, I was using Auto-Overclock and it managed to get it to run at around 4,3GHz without any issues or blue screens.

A
ash_n_brad
Posting Freak
778
10-29-2016, 06:34 PM
#6
remove that program and boost performance via the BIOS settings. The "core voltage offset" matches the dynamic vcore value.
A
ash_n_brad
10-29-2016, 06:34 PM #6

remove that program and boost performance via the BIOS settings. The "core voltage offset" matches the dynamic vcore value.

A
Alexis111111
Junior Member
19
10-30-2016, 04:15 AM
#7
It seems strange since you followed my instructions, yet you're still experiencing crashes at high frequencies. When you lower the voltage to 1.350V at 4.4GHz, there are no crashes, but at 4.5GHz it fails. You're trying to reduce the voltage gradually, currently at 1.320V, but it still drops without issues. What's going on? Why can't you go above 4.5GHz?
A
Alexis111111
10-30-2016, 04:15 AM #7

It seems strange since you followed my instructions, yet you're still experiencing crashes at high frequencies. When you lower the voltage to 1.350V at 4.4GHz, there are no crashes, but at 4.5GHz it fails. You're trying to reduce the voltage gradually, currently at 1.320V, but it still drops without issues. What's going on? Why can't you go above 4.5GHz?

B
Backstaber970
Senior Member
435
11-01-2016, 12:16 AM
#8
every chip depends on the draw of the random number. thus you remain stable at [email protected] (bios set). when executing prime95(26.6 small fft), what values are reported for realtemp, hwmonitor, max core temperatures, and cpu vcore? many chips show up to a 0.100v vcore variation. however i’m ready to wager that the person running g3258 at [email protected] will also reach the same core temperature as you, while being aware you might face a temperature limit before your vcore drops.
B
Backstaber970
11-01-2016, 12:16 AM #8

every chip depends on the draw of the random number. thus you remain stable at [email protected] (bios set). when executing prime95(26.6 small fft), what values are reported for realtemp, hwmonitor, max core temperatures, and cpu vcore? many chips show up to a 0.100v vcore variation. however i’m ready to wager that the person running g3258 at [email protected] will also reach the same core temperature as you, while being aware you might face a temperature limit before your vcore drops.

S
SpiritClaws
Member
217
11-02-2016, 10:19 PM
#9
I don't understand why they marked it as the "best solution," but nothing worked for you.
S
SpiritClaws
11-02-2016, 10:19 PM #9

I don't understand why they marked it as the "best solution," but nothing worked for you.