F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop the usb3.0 usb 3.2 connector is damaged yet appears functional

the usb3.0 usb 3.2 connector is damaged yet appears functional

the usb3.0 usb 3.2 connector is damaged yet appears functional

1
111carys111
Posting Freak
832
04-22-2017, 08:03 PM
#1
while handling my cables for a tricky situation I accidentally unplugged and tried to connect my front IO USB 3.2 port, breaking the pin in the upper right corner. I’m unsure if the attached image is suitable for me, but if it is, I damaged the 'ID' pin. The pin fell off completely, so I thought plugging it back in without the pin would work. It mostly functions through my USB ports, like my Xbox controller, but if I wanted to use it for USB storage, would it still operate properly?
1
111carys111
04-22-2017, 08:03 PM #1

while handling my cables for a tricky situation I accidentally unplugged and tried to connect my front IO USB 3.2 port, breaking the pin in the upper right corner. I’m unsure if the attached image is suitable for me, but if it is, I damaged the 'ID' pin. The pin fell off completely, so I thought plugging it back in without the pin would work. It mostly functions through my USB ports, like my Xbox controller, but if I wanted to use it for USB storage, would it still operate properly?

B
Brunoangel
Junior Member
11
04-23-2017, 02:56 AM
#2
Without that connector, all your gadgets will run at 2.0 performance levels. That connector is needed for the device to recognize itself as a USB 3.0 compatible unit.
B
Brunoangel
04-23-2017, 02:56 AM #2

Without that connector, all your gadgets will run at 2.0 performance levels. That connector is needed for the device to recognize itself as a USB 3.0 compatible unit.

D
dustin666
Member
212
05-10-2017, 03:03 AM
#3
It seems to be a "no connection" pin (see pin 10 below). There isn't an equivalent in the USB A ports, so I don't know what it would be used for. The consensus of a few sources I read seem to point the functionality that was planned in the standard, but never finalized.
D
dustin666
05-10-2017, 03:03 AM #3

It seems to be a "no connection" pin (see pin 10 below). There isn't an equivalent in the USB A ports, so I don't know what it would be used for. The consensus of a few sources I read seem to point the functionality that was planned in the standard, but never finalized.

A
ArkioXD
Member
53
05-10-2017, 04:11 AM
#4
It seems unclear what you meant, but likely you're suggesting it might not have a specific goal. Kelvinhall05 mentioned that all devices will run at 2.0 speeds, which is probably because the pin is set to indicate USB 3.0 compatibility.
A
ArkioXD
05-10-2017, 04:11 AM #4

It seems unclear what you meant, but likely you're suggesting it might not have a specific goal. Kelvinhall05 mentioned that all devices will run at 2.0 speeds, which is probably because the pin is set to indicate USB 3.0 compatibility.

B
bapti62
Member
68
05-10-2017, 10:23 AM
#5
The information provided isn't accurate. USB3 operates at USB3 speeds when all four high-speed pins are connected properly, without relying on a detection pin. It seems the device likely serves no specific function in this context.
B
bapti62
05-10-2017, 10:23 AM #5

The information provided isn't accurate. USB3 operates at USB3 speeds when all four high-speed pins are connected properly, without relying on a detection pin. It seems the device likely serves no specific function in this context.

X
xMysticMew
Member
54
05-17-2017, 03:41 PM
#6
Thanks for the feedback. I should have been more careful with the pin snap. If they're correct, a 2.0 still works fine as long as it performs well.
X
xMysticMew
05-17-2017, 03:41 PM #6

Thanks for the feedback. I should have been more careful with the pin snap. If they're correct, a 2.0 still works fine as long as it performs well.

S
SlapHappy28
Junior Member
15
05-18-2017, 05:19 PM
#7
I explored further and found no clear, consistent explanation. Opinions differ widely—some say it’s unrelated, others claim it needs grounding, some reference its use in detecting 3.0 devices, and a few mention overcurrent protection. It seems the meaning changes depending on the manufacturer and application. What unites us is the idea that it’s acceptable to break it.
S
SlapHappy28
05-18-2017, 05:19 PM #7

I explored further and found no clear, consistent explanation. Opinions differ widely—some say it’s unrelated, others claim it needs grounding, some reference its use in detecting 3.0 devices, and a few mention overcurrent protection. It seems the meaning changes depending on the manufacturer and application. What unites us is the idea that it’s acceptable to break it.