The U7 Pro model doesn’t support 2.5GbE connectivity.
The U7 Pro model doesn’t support 2.5GbE connectivity.
Hello, I have advertised 8500/1000 speeds with fiber coming to my Nokia 10G Ont+ box, after that it's plugged to sfp 10G udm pro se, after that from 2.5gbe port to trendnet 2.5gbe poe+ injector to my u7 pro. With galaxy s24 iam getting max 2002Mbps download 1586Mbps upload, on my pc I can get 7000Mbps 7200Mbps range download, my s24 ultra running on 320mhz wifi 7 6ghz, what can cause it not getting 2500Mbps speeds? Maybe client devices? There's is 2 15 pro max also in house. THANK YOU
The 160 MHz frequency band supports up to 1.2 Gbps per stream. Consider switching to another channel with less interference if needed.
Channel health reports great results instantly, but performance drops for all channels. Not sure which one to pick; also the test settings were 2002Mbps at 320MHz.
Enable automatic channel choice. UniFi will pick the optimal channel using its scan data. Keep in mind the U7-Pro supports only 2x2 on the 6GHz band. Although wider channels at 6GHz may boost bandwidth versus 5GHz, it won’t reach the performance of 4x4 or 16x16 setups. The S24 Ultra likely lacks antennas for larger streams, which could cause battery drain. Also, since the U7-Pro is restricted to 2x2 at 6GHz, any other device on that band will share bandwidth with your S24 Ultra. Your speeds match typical real-world results for the U7-Pro. Remember, WiFi operates in half-duplex mode and includes various additional factors.
It's quite complex with WiFi 7, especially if it's functioning correctly—it shouldn't be limited to just one channel, but instead spread across multiple bands. I questioned whether device manufacturers might restrict this for battery efficiency. The bigger issue is why a phone would require 2.5Gbit speeds; the only situation where my phone reaches that is when backing up photos directly to a NAS, where cloud services operate well under Gigabit limits.
MLO was not yet deployed on the U7-Pro according to recent reports, though it's expected in an upcoming firmware release. Some people get confused by technical details and set unrealistic goals.
Phone stays warm at 6GHz during use. When charging via +, it heats up like in a game. I'm backing up photos on my Synology DS923+ using a 2.5GbE adapter connected through a USB to a 2.5GbE UDM/SLAN port. It has RAID 0 with two Samsung NVMe drives and four 20TB exo drives.
MLO integrates all bands together, similar to Eero Max, but restricted to a single device.
What an unexpected move, Ubiquiti bringing back Alpha level retail firmware once more. It was the final nail in my plan not to engage with them again after the nanoHD release. Marketing a device as WiFi 7 while lacking MLO certification feels like a missed opportunity, especially since MLO + Multi-RU deliver most of the gains over WiFi 6e. The 160Mhz channel width paired with no MLO likely accounts for only marginal improvements. From my perspective, overlapping WiFi versions on the same channel can significantly hurt performance. I rely on my older nanoHD (OpenWRT) for legacy setups and keep my WiFi 6 AP dedicated to modern clients. This situation highlights how crucial it is for WiFi 7 to perform optimally.