The top routers include models known for speed, reliability, and features like strong security and easy setup.
The top routers include models known for speed, reliability, and features like strong security and easy setup.
Firmware and dependability from a software standpoint. Asus AX2900 outperforms their AC3100 and AC5300 models. Spending on an AX router isn't wise unless you manage over 20 active devices most of the time. In spaces with a media panel—where Ethernet hubs are mounted together and connected to rooms—most Asus AC routers can establish an AIMesh network regardless of differences, thanks to reliable wired backhaul options like Linksys WRT3200. Linux support is available via Ubiquiti Wirerouter (with Power over Ethernet), and the AP works well in multi-story buildings needing surveillance cameras. Using a PoE connection removes the need for extra power wiring.
I agree with your assessment about AX, which is why I’m not the top pick even though it works well. Most premium AC routers use Broadcom chips, but that doesn’t sway my decision much. Right now, I’m concentrating on getting a router with either a Broadcom or Qualcomm chipset—ideally not Broadcom—or for AX, also Lantiq with a quad-core processor. At least 128MB of DDR3 RAM (preferably 256MB), and at least 64MB of NAND storage (at least 128MB). For speeds, aim for 1.73Gb/s (2x2) or 1.3Gb/s (3x3) MultiMIMO, and make sure there are Ethernet ports. Then we check if the computer running the router meets these requirements—WiFi needs 1.73Gb/s 2x2 or 1.3Gb/s 3x3, while LAN should have at least 1Gb/s from any manufacturer other than Realtek.
If it appears here, it ranks among the top options: https://www.asuswrt-merlin.net/ I own only a handful of routers, but ASUS consistently delivers the best. Merlin keeps them running smoothly 24/7 and introduces fresh features not available in the official versions. Personally, I’d skip any DD-WRT enabled devices since their firmware is outdated, slow to update, and prone to bricking with newer daily releases. I won’t revisit that platform anytime soon. Also, ASUS’s QoS performs exceptionally well, which is essential for managing multiple computers in a network.
If they can secure performance parity with rivals on open-source drivers using freshly updated kernels, it’s impressive. Currently, DD-Wrt seems more current in this area (even though still quite old) compared to AsusWrt-Merlin (kernel 2.6). The main reason OpenWrt sticks to kernel 4.19 rather than 5.2 is its reliance on LTS kernels.
I just verified the details, and the GT-AC2900/RT-86U/RT-68U Extreme is indeed a dual-core processor (1.8Ghz Broadcom SoC). That confirms dual-core is sufficient. The Linksys WRT3200ACM seems more powerful overall—it features a Marvell SoC with 1.8Ghz dual-core, official OpenWrt support, extra storage, more RAM, additional Ethernet ports, 4x4 MultiMIMO with 160MHz bandwidth, and more antennas for better networking (including Bluetooth 4.1 and NFC). The WRT32x shares the same SoC but falls short in most specifications while being pricier.
@NonoZomb1e I’m convinced the WRT3200ACM is the top choice, especially since it’s available for $200 from Linksys and possibly cheaper on Amazon. Thanks to @PowerBaller for the tip.
Now, should this fit your budget? Also, what networking gear will you need from your PC—wireless or wired? What options already exist there?
It’s worth noting that these Linksys routers include a dual-firmware setup, which helps avoid damage. The antennas are easy to detach, which is great. Interestingly, Amazon lists some (open-box) units for around $150, while eBay has others for $100–120, and there’s a new unopened one for $170: https://www.ebay.com/itm/Linksys-WRT3200...SwMsZdO4Y3.
Could this technology come from Aquantia, which Marvell acquired recently? That might mean future WRT routers could benefit from those advancements. 5 or 10 Gbps Ethernet is impressive—would that be enough for your needs?
AC68U follows the AC1900 standard. Its 2.4 Ghz range supports speeds up to 600Mbps and 1300Mbps in the 5.0 Ghz band. Both AC86U and GT-AC2900 adhere to the AC2900 standard. The 2.4 Ghz channel reaches up to 750 Mbps, while the 5.0 Ghz channel hits 2167 Mbps, thanks to the enhanced internal antenna in AC86U and increased RAM and flash capacity in AC68U. Most notably, MU-Mimo is available in AC68U, whereas it's absent in AC86U. These features significantly boost performance when handling multiple connections simultaneously—perfect for syncing files across services like OneDrive or Google Drive while others are using them. The GT-2900 is considered the upgraded version of the GT-AC2900. Regarding pricing, camelcamelcamle.com lets you monitor price trends for items on Amazon Canada or .ca. In Canada, the AC86U costs CA$144 during Black Friday.
No other option matches the Mikrotik hAP Ac2. It offers great value at $60, supports 2gigs, works with most L2/3 protocols, and gets monthly updates. One of the most flexible and strong routers available. For higher performance, consider the RB4011 with 10gig. All the routers discussed handle wireless networking similarly but face challenges with security patches and speed problems. Mikrotik is a brand for both home users and businesses.
It seems the price is reasonable, but a standard MT7621AT paired with two Intel AX200 chips from AliExpress might beat the hAP AC², even though the latter lacks PoE. The AC² shares the same SoC as Google's OnHubs, but differs in Ethernet ports and storage compared to the Xiaomi Mi 3G, which currently offers the lowest cost router. Edit: The NetDuma R2 will feature a 4R4T WiFi chip, matching the Mediatek-based Mi Router Pro, with three options now available—Broadcom, Qualcomm, and Mediatek.