The system needs a bit more explanation.
The system needs a bit more explanation.
Played it on my R9 390, runs smoothly and consistently above 90 FPS. Tried it on the 6870... reports 2.2GB used out of 1GB consumed, but only achieves 35-50 FPS at 1080p with most high settings. UBI and their claims don’t match the performance.
Obtain the console if you prefer advanced PC specs. Not everyone relies on a basic setup.
System specs are often reduced to misleading statements. For example, FX-8120 versus Core i5-2500K—if you need the 2500K, the FX-8120 falls short. If the FX-8120 works, you likely don’t need the 2500K either. Establishing a direct comparison isn’t straightforward. The same applies to graphics cards: the HD 7970 and R9 280X match up with GTX 680 or 770. The GTX 670 is a less capable, slower option.
It operates smoothly without issues. It functions just like it did in 2015 with titles such as Witcher 3.
The 670 isn't a top-tier card, just like the 2500K. For those without modern equivalents to the listed components, an upgrade would be necessary.
Aim for a solid job with good pay; you wouldn’t complain about games with weak demands.
You’re into gaming, huh? Next time invest in a decent graphics card instead of skimping.
You shouldn’t buy cheap cards unless you’re sure you won’t need to upgrade often.
Edited September 27, 2015 by eLucid