F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop The setup at 3700x with 3080 Ti could cause a bottleneck.

The setup at 3700x with 3080 Ti could cause a bottleneck.

The setup at 3700x with 3080 Ti could cause a bottleneck.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
N
NooLele
Posting Freak
847
12-02-2021, 01:19 AM
#1
I reached a decision point where some suggested sticking with the 3700x for another year or two with the 3080 Ti, then moving up. Should I proceed? Could it really slow down my GPU performance? Or would it be better to upgrade to a 5800x and keep the 3700x mostly for gaming needs?
N
NooLele
12-02-2021, 01:19 AM #1

I reached a decision point where some suggested sticking with the 3700x for another year or two with the 3080 Ti, then moving up. Should I proceed? Could it really slow down my GPU performance? Or would it be better to upgrade to a 5800x and keep the 3700x mostly for gaming needs?

J
Jake_TheDoge
Member
207
12-02-2021, 12:31 PM
#2
It's mostly irrelevant unless you're aiming for top-tier comparisons. This setup handles any challenge you throw at it at a strong level for some time. A bit more FPS from a newer CPU usually doesn't alter the overall gameplay feel.
J
Jake_TheDoge
12-02-2021, 12:31 PM #2

It's mostly irrelevant unless you're aiming for top-tier comparisons. This setup handles any challenge you throw at it at a strong level for some time. A bit more FPS from a newer CPU usually doesn't alter the overall gameplay feel.

L
LeCrafteur974
Member
174
12-03-2021, 09:38 AM
#3
I'm looking into the reason behind this specific GPU bottleneck link.
L
LeCrafteur974
12-03-2021, 09:38 AM #3

I'm looking into the reason behind this specific GPU bottleneck link.

H
heyitsjackson
Member
170
12-04-2021, 06:53 PM
#4
They have these specs on their test platform. The voltage change varies based on your equipment and settings. Considering this, if we use their data, does the fps gap impact your gaming? The minimum frame rate they mentioned drops from 131 to 148 fps. Is 131 fps too low for you, or will 148 bring it up? That’s why I believe it doesn’t matter. The maximum output the system can handle should work well with any game at reasonable high settings. By the way, what kind of display do you have? A 3080 Ti would look great in 4K, though it might be a bit excessive for 1440p—still, I wouldn’t dismiss it.
H
heyitsjackson
12-04-2021, 06:53 PM #4

They have these specs on their test platform. The voltage change varies based on your equipment and settings. Considering this, if we use their data, does the fps gap impact your gaming? The minimum frame rate they mentioned drops from 131 to 148 fps. Is 131 fps too low for you, or will 148 bring it up? That’s why I believe it doesn’t matter. The maximum output the system can handle should work well with any game at reasonable high settings. By the way, what kind of display do you have? A 3080 Ti would look great in 4K, though it might be a bit excessive for 1440p—still, I wouldn’t dismiss it.

M
Masterminer586
Junior Member
15
12-05-2021, 03:36 AM
#5
Overkill isn't a thing. It's like gaming on a GPU bottleneck—it feels like playing in a laggy world. Console might be a better choice; it's cheaper and more reliable.
M
Masterminer586
12-05-2021, 03:36 AM #5

Overkill isn't a thing. It's like gaming on a GPU bottleneck—it feels like playing in a laggy world. Console might be a better choice; it's cheaper and more reliable.

E
eggman722
Member
176
12-05-2021, 07:02 PM
#6
The delay is minimal for gaming now that I'm using G-sync. It's not an issue for me. Others might play at lower framerates or with different settings, but consoles don't offer the games I enjoy.
E
eggman722
12-05-2021, 07:02 PM #6

The delay is minimal for gaming now that I'm using G-sync. It's not an issue for me. Others might play at lower framerates or with different settings, but consoles don't offer the games I enjoy.

A
alex909090
Junior Member
18
12-18-2021, 01:48 AM
#7
4K 240 resolution with 40 series technology
A
alex909090
12-18-2021, 01:48 AM #7

4K 240 resolution with 40 series technology

_
_Matoo_
Member
177
12-18-2021, 04:13 AM
#8
Every system has a limitation. What counts is the requirements of the specific applications or processes you're handling. For gaming, it's tough to restrict CPU performance at 1440p or higher. At 1080p, a bottleneck might appear on the CPU, depending on the game. That doesn't always cause an issue. You might only achieve around 400 FPS in CS:GO instead of the expected 425, but it's not a big deal.
_
_Matoo_
12-18-2021, 04:13 AM #8

Every system has a limitation. What counts is the requirements of the specific applications or processes you're handling. For gaming, it's tough to restrict CPU performance at 1440p or higher. At 1080p, a bottleneck might appear on the CPU, depending on the game. That doesn't always cause an issue. You might only achieve around 400 FPS in CS:GO instead of the expected 425, but it's not a big deal.

B
BluRamzy
Member
166
12-20-2021, 12:37 AM
#9
He might simply run at 120-150fps in Apex Legends rather than 300fps, since the 3700x frame rate is quite slow.
B
BluRamzy
12-20-2021, 12:37 AM #9

He might simply run at 120-150fps in Apex Legends rather than 300fps, since the 3700x frame rate is quite slow.

M
MCjeepers1009
Member
212
12-20-2021, 01:47 AM
#10
What could possibly be considered "slow" for such a high number? You'd need the latest generation or advanced architecture to keep up, which means it's not a major issue, even though it's quite an older model by today's standards. Many gamers are still playing comfortably on much simpler systems.
M
MCjeepers1009
12-20-2021, 01:47 AM #10

What could possibly be considered "slow" for such a high number? You'd need the latest generation or advanced architecture to keep up, which means it's not a major issue, even though it's quite an older model by today's standards. Many gamers are still playing comfortably on much simpler systems.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next