F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking The process isn't achieving the expected high GHz levels.

The process isn't achieving the expected high GHz levels.

The process isn't achieving the expected high GHz levels.

A
AaGHOSTaA
Junior Member
34
08-02-2016, 03:57 AM
#1
I've noticed some users who bought identical processors achieving 4.4GHz but only reaching 4.1GHz before their PC crashes. Is this a sign of poor performance in the silicon lottery, or should I adjust other settings? I haven't changed any other parameters besides core ratio and cache.
A
AaGHOSTaA
08-02-2016, 03:57 AM #1

I've noticed some users who bought identical processors achieving 4.4GHz but only reaching 4.1GHz before their PC crashes. Is this a sign of poor performance in the silicon lottery, or should I adjust other settings? I haven't changed any other parameters besides core ratio and cache.

D
Dacaspex
Member
156
08-02-2016, 09:04 AM
#2
You need more voltage. Try a +0.05V adjustment and observe how much you can increase it. Use 0.05V steps for safety.
D
Dacaspex
08-02-2016, 09:04 AM #2

You need more voltage. Try a +0.05V adjustment and observe how much you can increase it. Use 0.05V steps for safety.

D
DeathSh00ter
Member
158
08-04-2016, 02:47 PM
#3
Which processor are you using?
What configurations are active?
What are your current temperatures?
There are several factors that can influence overclocking, but based on the questions above, you might have missed something.
D
DeathSh00ter
08-04-2016, 02:47 PM #3

Which processor are you using?
What configurations are active?
What are your current temperatures?
There are several factors that can influence overclocking, but based on the questions above, you might have missed something.

T
TheBluArtist
Member
179
08-05-2016, 04:35 AM
#4
Consider this. If each chip could reach overclocking at 4.4 GHz, then why would the maker claim a lower speed? CPU makers specify core clock rates in this way since every Core I5-6600K can reliably run at that frequency. Intel’s decision to list 3.5 GHz for the Core I5-6600K is based on certainty that all units will perform at that rate. They understand some can be pushed higher, but there’s no assurance about it. Some might hit 4.4 GHz, others might only reach 4.1 GHz, and a few may not even surpass 4.0 GHz. That’s just how the market functions. It’s not a flaw in the chip—it’s simply that you might have bought one that can’t be overclocked as high.
T
TheBluArtist
08-05-2016, 04:35 AM #4

Consider this. If each chip could reach overclocking at 4.4 GHz, then why would the maker claim a lower speed? CPU makers specify core clock rates in this way since every Core I5-6600K can reliably run at that frequency. Intel’s decision to list 3.5 GHz for the Core I5-6600K is based on certainty that all units will perform at that rate. They understand some can be pushed higher, but there’s no assurance about it. Some might hit 4.4 GHz, others might only reach 4.1 GHz, and a few may not even surpass 4.0 GHz. That’s just how the market functions. It’s not a flaw in the chip—it’s simply that you might have bought one that can’t be overclocked as high.

F
FELIPE369
Member
234
08-05-2016, 10:47 AM
#5
What processor are you using? What configurations are in place? What are your temperatures?
F
FELIPE369
08-05-2016, 10:47 AM #5

What processor are you using? What configurations are in place? What are your temperatures?

X
XavegX367
Member
60
08-05-2016, 11:37 AM
#6
You need more voltage. Try a +0.05V adjustment and observe how much you can increase it. Use 0.05V steps for safety.
X
XavegX367
08-05-2016, 11:37 AM #6

You need more voltage. Try a +0.05V adjustment and observe how much you can increase it. Use 0.05V steps for safety.