F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop The new 9900ks are significantly affected due to the KS issue.

The new 9900ks are significantly affected due to the KS issue.

The new 9900ks are significantly affected due to the KS issue.

K
kohiplays
Member
155
11-04-2018, 09:06 PM
#1
I visited our nearby electronics store recently and discovered they have a fresh batch of 9900k's. I’m a friend of the owner, and he purchased one for me yesterday at 369€—about 130€ less than usual here. He told me his CPU doesn’t even hit 5 Ghz all-core, just like mine. All the CPUs they delivered are R0 steps and work great when overclocked. Except at 5 Ghz. My chip runs around 4.9 Ghz with a 4.7 Ghz cache at 1.26v Primestable (29.x with AVX and FM3), but 5 Ghz and 4.3 Ghz is not possible, even at 1.43v (with a slight boost to 1.392v). It crashes within seconds in the new NFS Game or Cinebench R15. His chip behaves the same. Running at 4.9 and 4.7 around 1.29v with 5 Ghz isn’t working, maybe that’s the new normal now? Since Intel seems to be pushing their predefined models.
K
kohiplays
11-04-2018, 09:06 PM #1

I visited our nearby electronics store recently and discovered they have a fresh batch of 9900k's. I’m a friend of the owner, and he purchased one for me yesterday at 369€—about 130€ less than usual here. He told me his CPU doesn’t even hit 5 Ghz all-core, just like mine. All the CPUs they delivered are R0 steps and work great when overclocked. Except at 5 Ghz. My chip runs around 4.9 Ghz with a 4.7 Ghz cache at 1.26v Primestable (29.x with AVX and FM3), but 5 Ghz and 4.3 Ghz is not possible, even at 1.43v (with a slight boost to 1.392v). It crashes within seconds in the new NFS Game or Cinebench R15. His chip behaves the same. Running at 4.9 and 4.7 around 1.29v with 5 Ghz isn’t working, maybe that’s the new normal now? Since Intel seems to be pushing their predefined models.

R
Repertition
Member
186
11-04-2018, 09:17 PM
#2
You seem to be asking about your motherboard model. Either you missed the lottery or you're using an older system. What model are you running?
R
Repertition
11-04-2018, 09:17 PM #2

You seem to be asking about your motherboard model. Either you missed the lottery or you're using an older system. What model are you running?

S
SkullyRoger
Member
147
11-06-2018, 03:47 PM
#3
The main focus is clear. If we had better samples, about 80% would pass the test. Z390 Extreme4 works fine. A 9900k operates at 5 GHz on a mid-range Z370 board. He handles a Maximus Hero.
S
SkullyRoger
11-06-2018, 03:47 PM #3

The main focus is clear. If we had better samples, about 80% would pass the test. Z390 Extreme4 works fine. A 9900k operates at 5 GHz on a mid-range Z370 board. He handles a Maximus Hero.

S
Sertero28
Senior Member
589
11-06-2018, 08:07 PM
#4
You're asking if it's worth the cost based on its performance.
S
Sertero28
11-06-2018, 08:07 PM #4

You're asking if it's worth the cost based on its performance.

M
minecraftak1
Member
74
11-07-2018, 07:54 AM
#5
I believe those two motherboards aren't ideal for the i9. They advertise 5GHz readiness across all cores, but real-world performance might be limited.
M
minecraftak1
11-07-2018, 07:54 AM #5

I believe those two motherboards aren't ideal for the i9. They advertise 5GHz readiness across all cores, but real-world performance might be limited.

L
lizardmentau
Member
59
11-07-2018, 04:42 PM
#6
I see he doesn't receive the advertised speed regardless of what he pays. Yet, perhaps he thought he got a deal for 20% off, but it felt like only 90% of the original value—disappointing since he was told it would be worth 100%. Still, it's a small loss compared to the full price he expected.
L
lizardmentau
11-07-2018, 04:42 PM #6

I see he doesn't receive the advertised speed regardless of what he pays. Yet, perhaps he thought he got a deal for 20% off, but it felt like only 90% of the original value—disappointing since he was told it would be worth 100%. Still, it's a small loss compared to the full price he expected.

K
Kea2310
Junior Member
11
11-13-2018, 09:46 AM
#7
For 369€ it remains quite attractive, it's even a great deal.
K
Kea2310
11-13-2018, 09:46 AM #7

For 369€ it remains quite attractive, it's even a great deal.

D
Draker59
Member
126
11-13-2018, 02:32 PM
#8
That’s what I intended, but it looks like it won’t work as expected. I hope your friend can reach out to Intel (if they contacted them directly) and determine why the clock speeds aren’t functioning correctly.
D
Draker59
11-13-2018, 02:32 PM #8

That’s what I intended, but it looks like it won’t work as expected. I hope your friend can reach out to Intel (if they contacted them directly) and determine why the clock speeds aren’t functioning correctly.

B
BenTGreat
Senior Member
437
11-13-2018, 03:21 PM
#9
It might be similar to AMD, where they claim 4.2GHz, but the actual performance rarely reaches that level except briefly. If your CPU ever hit 5.0 without issues, it’s not misleading advertising—though if no one takes action, these companies can operate freely.
B
BenTGreat
11-13-2018, 03:21 PM #9

It might be similar to AMD, where they claim 4.2GHz, but the actual performance rarely reaches that level except briefly. If your CPU ever hit 5.0 without issues, it’s not misleading advertising—though if no one takes action, these companies can operate freely.

T
TheSimple
Member
229
11-13-2018, 05:18 PM
#10
The 100MHz frequencies aren't an issue because the cache operates smoothly at 4.7. I achieve better scores in Cinebench R15 and R20 with 4.9 and 4.7 cache compared to 5.0 and 4.3 cache. The system runs quite well at 1.264v (about 55-60°C during games), and I discovered a new high-performance AVX stress test for the latest game.
T
TheSimple
11-13-2018, 05:18 PM #10

The 100MHz frequencies aren't an issue because the cache operates smoothly at 4.7. I achieve better scores in Cinebench R15 and R20 with 4.9 and 4.7 cache compared to 5.0 and 4.3 cache. The system runs quite well at 1.264v (about 55-60°C during games), and I discovered a new high-performance AVX stress test for the latest game.