The Microsoft update is required and runs quietly in the background.
The Microsoft update is required and runs quietly in the background.
I adjusted a version of Windows 10 LTSC 1809 which required more than two years of work to shape it my way, eliminating services such as WaasMedic and other elements to prevent UpdateOrchestrator from relying on the task scheduler. After installing it, I used an old Duo Core key I found and it performed exceptionally well. A musician observed it surpassed his I5 in certain benchmarks. I explained this was due to reduced overhead, absence of app store updates, and fewer background processes since it's an older release with less loading. A year later, he complained about frequent interruptions after major updates, persistent prompts for privacy settings, constant requests to pay for Onedrive, and his reluctance to try Office 365 because he preferred LibreOffice. The turning point came with Co Pilot, which kept installing, slowed down audio apps, and behaved like an Internet Explorer add-on with excessive background activity. Eventually, I installed a clean copy of Windows 10 LTSC and he reported it runs smoothly—updates function properly without crashing the system. I’m now offering to help him with disk images just in case he tries the newer version. I noticed the next Windows LTSC release had these animated placeholder icons appearing repeatedly during startup, causing a significant jump in CPU usage. Eventually, I gave up on that build. I hope this upcoming release is discontinued so I can avoid any further interference with my personal files and applications. I won’t tolerate anything that disrupts my workflow or material ownership.
For a straightforward setup with broad driver support, Fedora is a great choice. You can enjoy playing Vidya without major problems. Most games work smoothly, though you might face challenges with older titles that depend on OpenGL—there are solutions but using a VM with Windows XP could be more reliable. Current titles perform well, and having Steam makes things easier since it includes Steam Proton.
I'm currently using a dual boot setup with Mint and plan to transition to Linux eventually. This approach is concerning for Microsoft, and they should be addressed. Their actions are unacceptable.
I created a fresh copy of Windows 11, removed Defender and Edge, and stripped away all unnecessary apps. It performed smoothly with only essential features. The main issue was disabled updates, which would automatically reinstall everything I had removed. I had a separate firewall and antivirus, keeping me safe online. My system ran on an AMD CPU, and older versions of Windows 11 didn’t work well—VR caused instability. I’ve uninstalled multiple drives repeatedly because Windows kept reinstalling them, making the experience really frustrating. Selecting folder views globally is difficult; each drive and specific folders need to be configured individually. Why?
They're criticized but what many dedicated *NIX/FOSS supporters* need to grasp is that ordinary people aren't concerned about corporate giants knowing exactly what they do or keeping detailed records. In reality, they’re eager to share all this information for free in return for ease. We’re talking individuals with homes packed full of cameras and microphones—imagine unlocking phones by sharing fingerprints and facial scans just to save the hassle of repeatedly entering a PIN, sending voice notes instead of typing, or dealing with the effort of creating voice samples. There are countless examples: smart doorbells, smart HVAC systems, even smart light bulbs connected online. The scope stretches further—tracking sleep patterns, health metrics, medication use, dietary habits, purchases, and physical measurements via apps that generate 3D body models using AI. Microsoft’s own practices, like taking screenshots and storing them, pale in comparison to the vast alternatives available. They’ll happily accept these conveniences because they believe it makes their devices smarter.
This project starts with setting up Linux Mint, then switching between it and Windows to run games that require the other operating system, like the game associated with my profile picture.
It might be 2025 when Linux takes center stage, unless another prominent tech creator opts for a complete Windows alternative. I’m not keen on forced updates or recall features, and as long as I can turn it off, I’m fine with future updates. If Linux can match the game compatibility of Windows, I won’t switch. For me, enjoying the games that matter most is more important than any other concern. Plus, living in the EU means data rules are tight, so I expect any inclusion will require clear user permission.
Due to several reasons, the situation is clear: unless users are ready to make changes and adapt their needs to Linux or Mac, Microsoft can operate with minimal consequences. Typically, people purchase devices to suit their requirements instead of the reverse. While Apple offers top-tier laptops with impressive CPU and RAM speeds, these features become irrelevant for someone who prioritizes performance and compatibility over brand prestige. Right now, Windows occupies a middle ground—necessary but not ideal—because switching away would eliminate the value of owning a PC altogether. I think Linux can gain real traction by focusing on making home servers practical and affordable for more people. This isn’t a simple path, as many have shifted tasks to the cloud; reversing that trend could open doors for home use and user-friendly solutions. Greater demand for compatible software, improved drivers, and better support would follow. Achieving this will likely need significant industry collaboration—possibly led by companies like AMD, with OEMs and storage providers joining—and a substantial marketing push to capture market share. It remains an ambitious goal, but the privacy angle makes it slightly more attainable than a complete shutdown.
Microsoft has consistently stated that this feature is exclusive to their own Copilot laptops and relies on specialized hardware enhancements built into those devices. They've also promoted it as part of their marketing strategy for these machines. This suggests they aren't planning to distribute the capability broadly just yet. It seems they're likely releasing a basic, inactive version of the service alongside Windows 11 to integrate it with File Explorer without creating two separate versions of the core tool. The creator of the video is worried about potential background activity and possible performance issues if the service behaves as advertised—such as excessive resource consumption, slow speeds, and higher network usage. This kind of behavior resembles Cortana or Edge, which users can manage but aren't always fully controllable. Regarding a shift to Linux, it's clear Microsoft hasn't made this promise; they've likely focused on Windows for now. Past mistakes suggest they may not be committed to this approach.