F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking The G.SKILL Trident Z 3200MHz CL14 supports overclocking.

The G.SKILL Trident Z 3200MHz CL14 supports overclocking.

The G.SKILL Trident Z 3200MHz CL14 supports overclocking.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
K
KingPandino
Member
98
08-04-2020, 11:11 AM
#1
Hello everyone, I'm curious if anyone using a kit like mine has explored overclocking methods or adjustments to tightening settings.
My setup is a Ram kit: G.Skill Trident Z 3200Mhz Cl14 (14-14-14-34) at 1.350V with 16GB RAM.
I'm considering pushing it up to around 3400-3733Mhz.
I was thinking about raising the voltage to 1.380-1.400 and experimenting with higher frequencies (timings to achieve a faster rate).
If anyone has tried this kind of kit before, any advice or a starting point would be greatly appreciated.
Salutations.
K
KingPandino
08-04-2020, 11:11 AM #1

Hello everyone, I'm curious if anyone using a kit like mine has explored overclocking methods or adjustments to tightening settings.
My setup is a Ram kit: G.Skill Trident Z 3200Mhz Cl14 (14-14-14-34) at 1.350V with 16GB RAM.
I'm considering pushing it up to around 3400-3733Mhz.
I was thinking about raising the voltage to 1.380-1.400 and experimenting with higher frequencies (timings to achieve a faster rate).
If anyone has tried this kind of kit before, any advice or a starting point would be greatly appreciated.
Salutations.

G
Ghastling
Junior Member
20
08-06-2020, 10:07 PM
#2
It doesn't make sense to just raise timings to C16 and set a longer duration. That approach could be more effective. Also, using 1.4V might shorten the lifespan of the memory, though it's possible it wouldn't affect it. I'm sure the RAM was costly.
G
Ghastling
08-06-2020, 10:07 PM #2

It doesn't make sense to just raise timings to C16 and set a longer duration. That approach could be more effective. Also, using 1.4V might shorten the lifespan of the memory, though it's possible it wouldn't affect it. I'm sure the RAM was costly.

T
theporkpie21
Junior Member
43
08-07-2020, 05:47 AM
#3
My studies show 1.4v is acceptable for continuous use. However, stay within the 1.4v limit. A speed of 3600 is also sensible. As mentioned before, you may need to adjust the timing settings to achieve this.
T
theporkpie21
08-07-2020, 05:47 AM #3

My studies show 1.4v is acceptable for continuous use. However, stay within the 1.4v limit. A speed of 3600 is also sensible. As mentioned before, you may need to adjust the timing settings to achieve this.

C
Cuntuc
Member
71
08-28-2020, 12:32 PM
#4
Handle G.Skill modules with care; achieving 3600MHz from a 3200MHz setup will likely be a challenging task, especially with relaxed timing and 1.4V. With my 16GB (2x8) F4-3200C14D-16GTZR kit, using Thyphoon and Ryzen Dram Calculator I found stability with SAFE, but FAST was inconsistent without CL15. Hope you manage to reach 3400MHz.
C
Cuntuc
08-28-2020, 12:32 PM #4

Handle G.Skill modules with care; achieving 3600MHz from a 3200MHz setup will likely be a challenging task, especially with relaxed timing and 1.4V. With my 16GB (2x8) F4-3200C14D-16GTZR kit, using Thyphoon and Ryzen Dram Calculator I found stability with SAFE, but FAST was inconsistent without CL15. Hope you manage to reach 3400MHz.

R
71
08-29-2020, 10:54 PM
#5
Research I've conducted shows 1.4v is acceptable for continuous use, though avoid exceeding it. 3600 hours seems reasonable; as mentioned earlier, you may need to adjust timing parameters to achieve this. Would you like to know why you're increasing your memory's speed? I've experienced similar overclocking before—it often requires a significant time investment to see performance gains. I'm curious about your motivation for pushing the hardware limits. I recently tested a 3733mhz configuration at 1.4 volts with stable 16-16-16-36 timings, completing two runs in memtest86. It seems fine so far.
R
Rodcraft99_PvP
08-29-2020, 10:54 PM #5

Research I've conducted shows 1.4v is acceptable for continuous use, though avoid exceeding it. 3600 hours seems reasonable; as mentioned earlier, you may need to adjust timing parameters to achieve this. Would you like to know why you're increasing your memory's speed? I've experienced similar overclocking before—it often requires a significant time investment to see performance gains. I'm curious about your motivation for pushing the hardware limits. I recently tested a 3733mhz configuration at 1.4 volts with stable 16-16-16-36 timings, completing two runs in memtest86. It seems fine so far.

P
Pickmaster12
Senior Member
710
09-06-2020, 12:35 AM
#6
MeanMachine41 shared their experience with setting up G.Skill modules, noting it could be a tough task to achieve 3600MHz from a 3200MHz kit even with relaxed timings and 1.4V. They mentioned using a 16GB (2x8) F4-3200C14D-16GTZR kit and found stability with SAFE, though FAST was inconsistent without going to CL15. They offered good luck if anyone manages to reach 3400MHz. They also reported stable results at 3733mhz with 1.4V and 16-16-16-36 timings during a recent memtest86 run.
P
Pickmaster12
09-06-2020, 12:35 AM #6

MeanMachine41 shared their experience with setting up G.Skill modules, noting it could be a tough task to achieve 3600MHz from a 3200MHz kit even with relaxed timings and 1.4V. They mentioned using a 16GB (2x8) F4-3200C14D-16GTZR kit and found stability with SAFE, though FAST was inconsistent without going to CL15. They offered good luck if anyone manages to reach 3400MHz. They also reported stable results at 3733mhz with 1.4V and 16-16-16-36 timings during a recent memtest86 run.

T
timo_1892
Senior Member
715
09-06-2020, 06:21 AM
#7
volkgren :
Why not just raise the timings to C16 and try 3600? That sounds quite sensible. 1.4V could shorten the lifespan of the memory, though maybe not. Still, I’m sure the RAM was costly.
I ran at 3733mhz with 1.4Volts and 16-16-16-36 timings, stable for two runs in memtest86. So it seems fine to me. 😊
T
timo_1892
09-06-2020, 06:21 AM #7

volkgren :
Why not just raise the timings to C16 and try 3600? That sounds quite sensible. 1.4V could shorten the lifespan of the memory, though maybe not. Still, I’m sure the RAM was costly.
I ran at 3733mhz with 1.4Volts and 16-16-16-36 timings, stable for two runs in memtest86. So it seems fine to me. 😊

H
HarryStar
Member
50
09-06-2020, 11:32 AM
#8
Executed Cinebench R15 multiple times and ran Prime95 Blend for one hour.
H
HarryStar
09-06-2020, 11:32 AM #8

Executed Cinebench R15 multiple times and ran Prime95 Blend for one hour.

B
Butterfly1416
Senior Member
701
09-07-2020, 08:47 PM
#9
Running Cinebench R15 multiple times and Prime95 Blend for an hour is what I plan to do. My 8700k OC is around 1570-1580 points consistent. After six runs, 30 minutes of Prime95 at 10 bar still works well.
B
Butterfly1416
09-07-2020, 08:47 PM #9

Running Cinebench R15 multiple times and Prime95 Blend for an hour is what I plan to do. My 8700k OC is around 1570-1580 points consistent. After six runs, 30 minutes of Prime95 at 10 bar still works well.

D
Darkjango808
Junior Member
6
09-08-2020, 03:22 AM
#10
Was das Testen vor dem OC bereits durchgeführt, um einen Ausgangswert zu haben? Nur um sicherzustellen, dass die Steigerung der Frequenz und die lockeren Timings nicht bei höheren Spannungen denselben Leistungsabfall verursachen.
D
Darkjango808
09-08-2020, 03:22 AM #10

Was das Testen vor dem OC bereits durchgeführt, um einen Ausgangswert zu haben? Nur um sicherzustellen, dass die Steigerung der Frequenz und die lockeren Timings nicht bei höheren Spannungen denselben Leistungsabfall verursachen.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next