F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop The GPU will utilize the additional GHz if available.

The GPU will utilize the additional GHz if available.

The GPU will utilize the additional GHz if available.

T
TommyHU3_
Member
Find
153
04-08-2018, 05:16 AM
#1
Consider purchasing the Ryzen 5 2600 paired with the 1650 Super. Both have a 5.91% GPU bottleneck, matching the performance of the Ryzen 5 2600. The higher clock speeds in the 2600 don't offset the bottleneck impact.
Reply
Reply
T
TommyHU3_
04-08-2018, 05:16 AM #1

Consider purchasing the Ryzen 5 2600 paired with the 1650 Super. Both have a 5.91% GPU bottleneck, matching the performance of the Ryzen 5 2600. The higher clock speeds in the 2600 don't offset the bottleneck impact.

Reply
Reply
T
TMayes136
Member
Find
142
04-09-2018, 06:59 AM
#2
The GPU is usually the limiting factor, not the CPU. Online tests often give misleading results; check YouTube and see what games fit your hardware. A 1650 Super should work with a 1600 AF or 2600. *Unless the game demands huge CPU usage but then the GPU becomes the issue—this setup is fine.*
Reply
Reply
T
TMayes136
04-09-2018, 06:59 AM #2

The GPU is usually the limiting factor, not the CPU. Online tests often give misleading results; check YouTube and see what games fit your hardware. A 1650 Super should work with a 1600 AF or 2600. *Unless the game demands huge CPU usage but then the GPU becomes the issue—this setup is fine.*

Reply
Reply
F
Foreverbee
Junior Member
Find
19
04-09-2018, 07:24 AM
#3
Avoid relying on basic calculators. They often provide inaccurate results, similar to PSU power calculations. You won’t face any problems with these setups.
Reply
Reply
F
Foreverbee
04-09-2018, 07:24 AM #3

Avoid relying on basic calculators. They often provide inaccurate results, similar to PSU power calculations. You won’t face any problems with these setups.

Reply
Reply
S
snowtooth
Junior Member
Find
20
04-09-2018, 11:56 PM
#4
The Ryzen 5 1600 is roughly 8% slower than the Ryzen 5 2600. If you're willing to spend a bit more, the 2600 might be worth it. Bottleneck tools aren't always accurate.
Reply
Reply
S
snowtooth
04-09-2018, 11:56 PM #4

The Ryzen 5 1600 is roughly 8% slower than the Ryzen 5 2600. If you're willing to spend a bit more, the 2600 might be worth it. Bottleneck tools aren't always accurate.

Reply
Reply
A
audi497mks
Senior Member
Find
601
04-10-2018, 12:45 AM
#5
Consider the Ryzen 3 3100; it should perform slightly better in games compared to the 1600, and likely even more so than the 2600.
Reply
Reply
A
audi497mks
04-10-2018, 12:45 AM #5

Consider the Ryzen 3 3100; it should perform slightly better in games compared to the 1600, and likely even more so than the 2600.

Reply
Reply
G
godzillaslime
Member
Find
177
04-10-2018, 05:02 AM
#6
Shifted to CPUs, motherboards and memory systems
Reply
Reply
G
godzillaslime
04-10-2018, 05:02 AM #6

Shifted to CPUs, motherboards and memory systems

Reply
Reply