F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming The GPU might not support the required performance for Minecraft with RTX 2060, or there could be driver issues.

The GPU might not support the required performance for Minecraft with RTX 2060, or there could be driver issues.

The GPU might not support the required performance for Minecraft with RTX 2060, or there could be driver issues.

F
FieryExile_
Member
231
10-26-2019, 03:36 PM
#1
I've experimented with shaders in ray tracing enabled mode in Minecraft. My RTX 2060 usually handles 1080p around 20fps max and 1440p around 14fps max, even with the highest settings. When I run MSI Afterburner, my GPU reaches its limits but the CPU stays around 40%. It's unclear why I'm not seeing smoother performance compared to others—anyone have insights?
F
FieryExile_
10-26-2019, 03:36 PM #1

I've experimented with shaders in ray tracing enabled mode in Minecraft. My RTX 2060 usually handles 1080p around 20fps max and 1440p around 14fps max, even with the highest settings. When I run MSI Afterburner, my GPU reaches its limits but the CPU stays around 40%. It's unclear why I'm not seeing smoother performance compared to others—anyone have insights?

P
Pyro_Knight
Member
113
10-26-2019, 03:53 PM
#2
Your system runs a 5700 xt CPU, which is quite capable for Minecraft with shaders. You're seeing around 70+ FPS suggests good performance, but let me know if you'd like tips to boost it further!
P
Pyro_Knight
10-26-2019, 03:53 PM #2

Your system runs a 5700 xt CPU, which is quite capable for Minecraft with shaders. You're seeing around 70+ FPS suggests good performance, but let me know if you'd like tips to boost it further!

A
AhBilly
Member
114
10-28-2019, 12:18 AM
#3
What processor are you using? The graphics card should maintain around 200 frames per second unless you're running a lot of unnecessary shaders.
A
AhBilly
10-28-2019, 12:18 AM #3

What processor are you using? The graphics card should maintain around 200 frames per second unless you're running a lot of unnecessary shaders.

S
Shayfull
Member
163
10-28-2019, 03:26 PM
#4
I achieve 200 fps using medium options without ray tracing or shaders, but performance drops to around 10 fps afterward. My Ryzen 5 2600 is overclocked to 4GHz.
S
Shayfull
10-28-2019, 03:26 PM #4

I achieve 200 fps using medium options without ray tracing or shaders, but performance drops to around 10 fps afterward. My Ryzen 5 2600 is overclocked to 4GHz.

_
_Billie_
Junior Member
48
10-29-2019, 11:53 PM
#5
ryzen 5 2600 at 4GHz
_
_Billie_
10-29-2019, 11:53 PM #5

ryzen 5 2600 at 4GHz

A
AimeeL9876
Junior Member
42
10-30-2019, 01:08 AM
#6
Handling ray tracing on the RTX 2060 remains challenging, so normal shaders typically deliver lower frame rates compared to ray-traced scenes.
A
AimeeL9876
10-30-2019, 01:08 AM #6

Handling ray tracing on the RTX 2060 remains challenging, so normal shaders typically deliver lower frame rates compared to ray-traced scenes.

I
iiSweeTzz
Posting Freak
862
10-31-2019, 06:58 AM
#7
Ray tracing is really not worth it and you should never rely on it. It’s just bad quality, and the fact that they promoted such a weak shader makes it even worse. Running ray tracing smoothly would require something like a 2080ti, but even then it’s still poor. I’d steer clear of complex shaders since MC often struggles with them too.
I
iiSweeTzz
10-31-2019, 06:58 AM #7

Ray tracing is really not worth it and you should never rely on it. It’s just bad quality, and the fact that they promoted such a weak shader makes it even worse. Running ray tracing smoothly would require something like a 2080ti, but even then it’s still poor. I’d steer clear of complex shaders since MC often struggles with them too.