F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems The drops in patch performance are not within the expected range

The drops in patch performance are not within the expected range

The drops in patch performance are not within the expected range

C
ckg63
Member
196
12-06-2018, 06:40 PM
#1
I'm using Windows 10 version 19H1 on a system with specific hardware. The read/write speeds have dropped significantly—from 10000 MB/s to 6000 MB/s, which is roughly a 40% decrease. This could be due to limitations from my motherboard or CPU. The board's speed might not reach the full potential, possibly capping at around 17500 MB/s. I'm testing with a Threadripper 2990wx CPU, F4-3600c18d RAM, MSI Creation Meg X399, GALAX RTX 2080Ti, and a PM981 SSD. The current environment includes Windows Server 2019 (version 1809) and Windows 10 Pro Workstation 19H1. Anyone know if RAID 0 on an X399 achieves similar speeds? What are typical results?
C
ckg63
12-06-2018, 06:40 PM #1

I'm using Windows 10 version 19H1 on a system with specific hardware. The read/write speeds have dropped significantly—from 10000 MB/s to 6000 MB/s, which is roughly a 40% decrease. This could be due to limitations from my motherboard or CPU. The board's speed might not reach the full potential, possibly capping at around 17500 MB/s. I'm testing with a Threadripper 2990wx CPU, F4-3600c18d RAM, MSI Creation Meg X399, GALAX RTX 2080Ti, and a PM981 SSD. The current environment includes Windows Server 2019 (version 1809) and Windows 10 Pro Workstation 19H1. Anyone know if RAID 0 on an X399 achieves similar speeds? What are typical results?

I
I_Love_GcPVP
Junior Member
35
12-06-2018, 07:46 PM
#2
How exactly do you use this speed anyways?
I
I_Love_GcPVP
12-06-2018, 07:46 PM #2

How exactly do you use this speed anyways?

V
VeroPlayz
Member
235
12-14-2018, 11:43 AM
#3
They likely used a RAID0 setup with multiple SSDs connected directly without an add-on card. There may not be a single card providing enough slots, and splitting across several cards or interfaces could lead to slower performance.
V
VeroPlayz
12-14-2018, 11:43 AM #3

They likely used a RAID0 setup with multiple SSDs connected directly without an add-on card. There may not be a single card providing enough slots, and splitting across several cards or interfaces could lead to slower performance.

M
MaxiGamer88
Junior Member
39
12-14-2018, 03:39 PM
#4
Really, I just need quicker and quicker.
M
MaxiGamer88
12-14-2018, 03:39 PM #4

Really, I just need quicker and quicker.

T
129
12-14-2018, 08:27 PM
#5
and how did you manage to get 7 drives to the motherboard? AND IF you are really on 19H1... first off it's an insider build, second it should fix the performance issues, third don't use insider builds for evaluating such things, maybe it got corrupted. during install/update to 19H1. AND I really hope for you you are not trolling, so maybe post some evidence, the longer I think about it the more unlikely it becomes for me
T
ToStonedToPlay
12-14-2018, 08:27 PM #5

and how did you manage to get 7 drives to the motherboard? AND IF you are really on 19H1... first off it's an insider build, second it should fix the performance issues, third don't use insider builds for evaluating such things, maybe it got corrupted. during install/update to 19H1. AND I really hope for you you are not trolling, so maybe post some evidence, the longer I think about it the more unlikely it becomes for me

D
Dylanndog
Junior Member
19
12-15-2018, 05:19 AM
#6
3 slots on the main board and 4 on the extension card. I’m aware there could be a performance reduction, so I anticipate the speed will be lower—around 17500MB/S (with single reads at 3000MB/S and write at 1500MB/S). The more significant point is that if the true maximum is about 10GB/s, it remains quite disappointing. Additionally, the only change I made was updating the Windows version, which accounts for roughly a 40% drop in performance. With just one adjustment, this seems like a reliable comparison.
D
Dylanndog
12-15-2018, 05:19 AM #6

3 slots on the main board and 4 on the extension card. I’m aware there could be a performance reduction, so I anticipate the speed will be lower—around 17500MB/S (with single reads at 3000MB/S and write at 1500MB/S). The more significant point is that if the true maximum is about 10GB/s, it remains quite disappointing. Additionally, the only change I made was updating the Windows version, which accounts for roughly a 40% drop in performance. With just one adjustment, this seems like a reliable comparison.

S
saburo
Member
192
12-15-2018, 02:06 PM
#7
I checked it after adjusting the layout, secure earse+, and reformatting once more. I’m currently working on it. I might share the crystal disk mark later, when I return home in about 11 hours.
S
saburo
12-15-2018, 02:06 PM #7

I checked it after adjusting the layout, secure earse+, and reformatting once more. I’m currently working on it. I might share the crystal disk mark later, when I return home in about 11 hours.

P
PinqNoLag
Member
181
01-03-2019, 03:52 AM
#8
The capture was taken on Win10 18282. This image shows what happened when I switched to Windows Server 2019 (1809). I don’t have a full system snapshot, but the photo was sent to Garena so my friend could view it. After that, I moved to Win10 18305, and the speed reached about 6000MB/s. This helped me understand the issue better. I noticed the problem started with Windows 18282, then worsened on 1809, and finally improved after updating the BIOS on 2019. The speed returned to normal at 18305, which I now believe is due to Windows rather than the BIOS.
P
PinqNoLag
01-03-2019, 03:52 AM #8

The capture was taken on Win10 18282. This image shows what happened when I switched to Windows Server 2019 (1809). I don’t have a full system snapshot, but the photo was sent to Garena so my friend could view it. After that, I moved to Win10 18305, and the speed reached about 6000MB/s. This helped me understand the issue better. I noticed the problem started with Windows 18282, then worsened on 1809, and finally improved after updating the BIOS on 2019. The speed returned to normal at 18305, which I now believe is due to Windows rather than the BIOS.

O
onecor36
Junior Member
48
01-03-2019, 06:27 AM
#9
Uploaded. No questions.
O
onecor36
01-03-2019, 06:27 AM #9

Uploaded. No questions.

X
xFqtal_
Senior Member
670
01-05-2019, 03:56 PM
#10
I just downloaded and installed 1809 again (dual boot). I’m confused about what’s happening. I’m using Anvil's Storage Utilities 1.1.0, which shows the same results for 1809 and 18305... but I don’t understand what changed. I can’t get 10GB/s anymore, even when trying it on a Crystal Disk Mark setup. Are there any updates or patches for the new version of 1809? Am I still using the same version with Windows Server 2019?
X
xFqtal_
01-05-2019, 03:56 PM #10

I just downloaded and installed 1809 again (dual boot). I’m confused about what’s happening. I’m using Anvil's Storage Utilities 1.1.0, which shows the same results for 1809 and 18305... but I don’t understand what changed. I can’t get 10GB/s anymore, even when trying it on a Crystal Disk Mark setup. Are there any updates or patches for the new version of 1809? Am I still using the same version with Windows Server 2019?