The 970 3.5GB version remains compatible with games, though some features might be limited.
The 970 3.5GB version remains compatible with games, though some features might be limited.
Up until now, reaching the 3.5 GB level has already caused performance drops below 60 fps, so many users reduce their settings to maintain above 60 while sacrificing VRAM. I haven’t experienced any issues. I’m a bit disappointed since this doesn’t provide as strong a sli option, but it did perform well initially. An 8 GB or even 6 GB version would have been ideal for sli. Overall, I’m still satisfied it worked and has been functioning smoothly so far.
If you land the hit, performance will decrease. +1 for R9 290X
I run 93 mods in my Skyrim copy, about 80 of which are graphical. I’m using ENB at 1080p max, and my GTX 970 stays under 3GB VRAM with a steady 60+ FPS.
Some benchmarks show a 970 ran GTA V in high settings at 1440p with 45-60 FPS.
I understand @i_build_nanosuits is based in Montreal, perhaps he can assist you
It will deliver the complete performance advantage of DX12, which is what most people are interested in. No one on the AMD side is complaining about missing DSR or MFAA.