F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking temperatures using i5 6600k at base clock with a h100i gtx water cooler

temperatures using i5 6600k at base clock with a h100i gtx water cooler

temperatures using i5 6600k at base clock with a h100i gtx water cooler

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
S
S4NP3I
Member
194
02-26-2016, 06:37 PM
#11
It's quite straightforward. Stability means maintaining performance under any load or command, without issues like blue screens or shutdowns. If it isn't stable, it will fail eventually. The Asus ROG RealBench is a solid way to check this. You can try Aida 64 or p95, but those are mainly for temperature testing and aren't ideal for general use.
S
S4NP3I
02-26-2016, 06:37 PM #11

It's quite straightforward. Stability means maintaining performance under any load or command, without issues like blue screens or shutdowns. If it isn't stable, it will fail eventually. The Asus ROG RealBench is a solid way to check this. You can try Aida 64 or p95, but those are mainly for temperature testing and aren't ideal for general use.

J
julian_PVP
Senior Member
465
02-27-2016, 04:58 PM
#12
Karadjgne:
Each CPU demands unique voltages, but you have to begin somewhere. I tend to start from the other side. I’ll begin at 1.4v and conduct stability tests as I increase the multiplier and llc settings. I don’t worry about temperatures just yet. I’ll keep testing until I reach a point where nothing improves stability. Then I’ll reduce the multiplier again, adjust llc to the last known stable setting, and gradually lower the voltage until it stabilizes at its lowest safe level. This approach should help me achieve the best performance with the lowest stable voltage.

For example, my i7-3770K runs smoothly at 1.32v for 4.9GHz at 72°C, achieving a p95 of 26.6 on Kraken X61. At 1.108v for 4.3GHz, my i5-3570k performs at 1.114v, which is also its maximum overclock point. For the i7-6700K, several users report needing 1.4v for stable operation even at stock speeds.

This means what one CPU considers over-voltage might be seen as under-voltage by another. It really depends on individual results.

A $25 investment is a good precaution. You weigh this against the risk of damaging the CPU. Since I’m new to overclocking, that risk is much higher than someone who has done it before. It’s an expense we might pay, just in case it pays off.
J
julian_PVP
02-27-2016, 04:58 PM #12

Karadjgne:
Each CPU demands unique voltages, but you have to begin somewhere. I tend to start from the other side. I’ll begin at 1.4v and conduct stability tests as I increase the multiplier and llc settings. I don’t worry about temperatures just yet. I’ll keep testing until I reach a point where nothing improves stability. Then I’ll reduce the multiplier again, adjust llc to the last known stable setting, and gradually lower the voltage until it stabilizes at its lowest safe level. This approach should help me achieve the best performance with the lowest stable voltage.

For example, my i7-3770K runs smoothly at 1.32v for 4.9GHz at 72°C, achieving a p95 of 26.6 on Kraken X61. At 1.108v for 4.3GHz, my i5-3570k performs at 1.114v, which is also its maximum overclock point. For the i7-6700K, several users report needing 1.4v for stable operation even at stock speeds.

This means what one CPU considers over-voltage might be seen as under-voltage by another. It really depends on individual results.

A $25 investment is a good precaution. You weigh this against the risk of damaging the CPU. Since I’m new to overclocking, that risk is much higher than someone who has done it before. It’s an expense we might pay, just in case it pays off.

W
WildCandy
Senior Member
675
03-11-2016, 11:43 AM
#13
Just curious, what is your room temperature? I personally can't have CPU less than 3-7C above ambient. Though I have a bit older 4770K (that is of course overclocked). My house temp is set to 20 degrees so I guess my room is the same.
W
WildCandy
03-11-2016, 11:43 AM #13

Just curious, what is your room temperature? I personally can't have CPU less than 3-7C above ambient. Though I have a bit older 4770K (that is of course overclocked). My house temp is set to 20 degrees so I guess my room is the same.

S
SkyWarsPro___
Member
200
03-11-2016, 06:20 PM
#14
more than 17C is unlikely. no air or liquid cooler can bring the cpu down to below ambient temperature.
S
SkyWarsPro___
03-11-2016, 06:20 PM #14

more than 17C is unlikely. no air or liquid cooler can bring the cpu down to below ambient temperature.

X
XknockMC
Member
121
03-12-2016, 11:00 PM
#15
more than 17°C seems unlikely. no air or liquid cooler could bring the cpu down to ambient temperature. probably the cpuid hwmonitor isn't working correctly, especially since it's showing issues with some of my cores.
X
XknockMC
03-12-2016, 11:00 PM #15

more than 17°C seems unlikely. no air or liquid cooler could bring the cpu down to ambient temperature. probably the cpuid hwmonitor isn't working correctly, especially since it's showing issues with some of my cores.

T
ThreeCreepers
Junior Member
10
03-20-2016, 02:30 PM
#16
It's not feasible to cool a CPU mechanically below ambient conditions. In a room at 20°C, components and the GPU generate heat, resulting in case temperatures of at least 22-24°C during idle. Average CPU idle temperatures typically range from 6° to 12° above ambient, with AIOs staying around 6° due to lack of airflow. A room temperature of 20° with an idle temperature of 25° is quite comfortable. What matters most are the load temperatures—your CPU performs best at around 100°C and should be kept under 70°C during heavy use, meaning load temps in the 40s are ideal. Skip tools like hwinfo64 or Hwmonitor; for Intel CPUs, Realtemp is reliable and accurate, avoiding misleading data such as tmpin_0.
T
ThreeCreepers
03-20-2016, 02:30 PM #16

It's not feasible to cool a CPU mechanically below ambient conditions. In a room at 20°C, components and the GPU generate heat, resulting in case temperatures of at least 22-24°C during idle. Average CPU idle temperatures typically range from 6° to 12° above ambient, with AIOs staying around 6° due to lack of airflow. A room temperature of 20° with an idle temperature of 25° is quite comfortable. What matters most are the load temperatures—your CPU performs best at around 100°C and should be kept under 70°C during heavy use, meaning load temps in the 40s are ideal. Skip tools like hwinfo64 or Hwmonitor; for Intel CPUs, Realtemp is reliable and accurate, avoiding misleading data such as tmpin_0.

O
oOEmmaOo
Posting Freak
818
03-20-2016, 06:45 PM
#17
Karadjgne:
Mechanically cooling a CPU below ambient temperatures isn't feasible. In a room at 20°C, with components generating heat, the case temperature typically stays between 22-24°C when idle. The airflow through the radiator usually keeps it around 6°C higher than ambient. Most CPUs run 6° to 12° above ambient, but AIOs stay closer to 6° since they lack active cooling fans.

For better accuracy, consider using Realtemp instead of hwinfo64 or Hwmonitor. It works well with p95 and provides reliable data without misleading metrics like tmpin_0. I've downloaded it and checked—your package temperatures are still showing around 18-17°C, which is normal for your setup.
O
oOEmmaOo
03-20-2016, 06:45 PM #17

Karadjgne:
Mechanically cooling a CPU below ambient temperatures isn't feasible. In a room at 20°C, with components generating heat, the case temperature typically stays between 22-24°C when idle. The airflow through the radiator usually keeps it around 6°C higher than ambient. Most CPUs run 6° to 12° above ambient, but AIOs stay closer to 6° since they lack active cooling fans.

For better accuracy, consider using Realtemp instead of hwinfo64 or Hwmonitor. It works well with p95 and provides reliable data without misleading metrics like tmpin_0. I've downloaded it and checked—your package temperatures are still showing around 18-17°C, which is normal for your setup.

B
Bonnibel
Posting Freak
794
03-23-2016, 12:52 PM
#18
don't begin at 1.4v... few coolers can maintain a skylake's temperature at that setting
B
Bonnibel
03-23-2016, 12:52 PM #18

don't begin at 1.4v... few coolers can maintain a skylake's temperature at that setting

T
59
03-23-2016, 01:59 PM
#19
don't begin at 1.4v... few coolers can maintain a skylake's temperature at that voltage
i began at 1.25v at 4.3 ghz and didn't encounter any crashes when i ran prime 95 with temps around 40 degrees. is this a solid starting point? should i reduce the voltage now?
T
THEDESTROYERV4
03-23-2016, 01:59 PM #19

don't begin at 1.4v... few coolers can maintain a skylake's temperature at that voltage
i began at 1.25v at 4.3 ghz and didn't encounter any crashes when i ran prime 95 with temps around 40 degrees. is this a solid starting point? should i reduce the voltage now?

A
Aquaman_JLA
Junior Member
44
03-25-2016, 04:18 AM
#20
It depends on your preference for increased speed. If you choose that, increase the multiplier and it will crash. Then raising the voltage should allow you to achieve 4.5ghz with about 1.3v.
A
Aquaman_JLA
03-25-2016, 04:18 AM #20

It depends on your preference for increased speed. If you choose that, increase the multiplier and it will crash. Then raising the voltage should allow you to achieve 4.5ghz with about 1.3v.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next