F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Temperature readings are significantly different from what each core should be.

Temperature readings are significantly different from what each core should be.

Temperature readings are significantly different from what each core should be.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
X
xBunnnii
Junior Member
23
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM
#1
Unlike typical adjustments, this involved a larger leap—about 10 times higher. If it had hit 99°C for the CPU temperature, it wouldn’t have throttled properly (the TM function was active at the maximum setting in BIOS). This suggests the readings are misleading, possibly due to sensor errors or calibration issues. The core temperature seems normal, but the difference between the two is significant. Right now, stress testing a 4.1GHz OC on an e5300 at around 1.45V is causing discomfort. It looks like a decent Wolf 2M model, especially compared to other CPUs that barely boot at 3.8GHz under similar conditions. My previous failures with E5700 CPUs are notable since they booted at 3.8GHz at 1.35V while this one runs at 3.9GHz. The profiles I moved from my P5Q indicate I’m reselling it for a profit, as I don’t need to overclock the board further. There’s also a 3.74GHz, 3.9GHz, and 4.1GHz profile that seems to work well here. This problem also occurred with my P5Q when I changed profiles; using different CPUs like E8400 works fine, while the core temp stays close to the CPU temp (±3°C). I didn’t overlook BIOS modifications for this new P5Q—saved the original OS because it’s an older version not available on the official site.
X
xBunnnii
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM #1

Unlike typical adjustments, this involved a larger leap—about 10 times higher. If it had hit 99°C for the CPU temperature, it wouldn’t have throttled properly (the TM function was active at the maximum setting in BIOS). This suggests the readings are misleading, possibly due to sensor errors or calibration issues. The core temperature seems normal, but the difference between the two is significant. Right now, stress testing a 4.1GHz OC on an e5300 at around 1.45V is causing discomfort. It looks like a decent Wolf 2M model, especially compared to other CPUs that barely boot at 3.8GHz under similar conditions. My previous failures with E5700 CPUs are notable since they booted at 3.8GHz at 1.35V while this one runs at 3.9GHz. The profiles I moved from my P5Q indicate I’m reselling it for a profit, as I don’t need to overclock the board further. There’s also a 3.74GHz, 3.9GHz, and 4.1GHz profile that seems to work well here. This problem also occurred with my P5Q when I changed profiles; using different CPUs like E8400 works fine, while the core temp stays close to the CPU temp (±3°C). I didn’t overlook BIOS modifications for this new P5Q—saved the original OS because it’s an older version not available on the official site.

9
905xA
Senior Member
667
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM
#2
Use a reliable tool such as hwinfo64 to monitor temperatures accurately.
9
905xA
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM #2

Use a reliable tool such as hwinfo64 to monitor temperatures accurately.

D
DarKLeqend
Junior Member
19
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM
#3
D
DarKLeqend
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM #3

A
AthenasLight
Posting Freak
781
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM
#4
I use it to manage my server fan on the CPU cooler because otherwise it would just sound like a blowdryer. Since I already have realtemp installed, I’ll also check that. If it doesn’t throttle at 100°C, temperatures should be okay though a bit high. I didn’t install the W7 update that enables hwinfo since I kept trying but it failed. I’m probably going to need a new ISO, but I’m not eager to search for a site with a broken W7 Ultimate ISO. No W10, and I don’t want to deal with constant bloat, though I might look into Revive OS as it seems to work well despite being bloated.
A
AthenasLight
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM #4

I use it to manage my server fan on the CPU cooler because otherwise it would just sound like a blowdryer. Since I already have realtemp installed, I’ll also check that. If it doesn’t throttle at 100°C, temperatures should be okay though a bit high. I didn’t install the W7 update that enables hwinfo since I kept trying but it failed. I’m probably going to need a new ISO, but I’m not eager to search for a site with a broken W7 Ultimate ISO. No W10, and I don’t want to deal with constant bloat, though I might look into Revive OS as it seems to work well despite being bloated.

T
TrilogyXO
Member
154
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM
#5
Yes, HWmonitor functions properly and provides accurate data for monitoring your hardware.
T
TrilogyXO
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM #5

Yes, HWmonitor functions properly and provides accurate data for monitoring your hardware.

M
MMASTER7
Member
227
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM
#6
Tried it before but I'm guessing I'll give it a go
M
MMASTER7
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM #6

Tried it before but I'm guessing I'll give it a go

M
mikabon
Junior Member
13
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM
#7
CPU temperature varies independently of core temperature across different boards. It tends to be the highest reading, often indicating the main performance bottleneck.
M
mikabon
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM #7

CPU temperature varies independently of core temperature across different boards. It tends to be the highest reading, often indicating the main performance bottleneck.

M
Mirrorous
Member
148
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM
#8
For tracking CPU temperatures, on Intel systems I rely on core temperature data. I also employ hwinfo64, though it’s not as relevant for my current setup since the hardware is older than that discussion.
M
Mirrorous
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM #8

For tracking CPU temperatures, on Intel systems I rely on core temperature data. I also employ hwinfo64, though it’s not as relevant for my current setup since the hardware is older than that discussion.

J
JohnWii
Junior Member
7
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM
#9
I think these Pentiums aren't soldered, so I'll have to desolder it myself. I'm pretty sure I won't need a desoldering tool, so I probably won't. It should only run at about 1.35 volts, though I doubt anyone selling it will have a cooler that can handle 1.45 volts. Running at 100°C shouldn't be an issue below 1.4 volts. I do have a temperature sensor and wanted to test it, but it looks like I might need to spray the socket because something is shorting. I'll wait until it dries before purchasing a DS3R. I should check the voltage settings at FSB—it seems weak power might be the problem. If I can fix it with BIOS reprogramming and submerging it in water, then I'll buy an X5260 + RX, a pump, extra tubing, and zip ties to finish my custom waterloop. I plan to run 4.8 volts or higher.
J
JohnWii
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM #9

I think these Pentiums aren't soldered, so I'll have to desolder it myself. I'm pretty sure I won't need a desoldering tool, so I probably won't. It should only run at about 1.35 volts, though I doubt anyone selling it will have a cooler that can handle 1.45 volts. Running at 100°C shouldn't be an issue below 1.4 volts. I do have a temperature sensor and wanted to test it, but it looks like I might need to spray the socket because something is shorting. I'll wait until it dries before purchasing a DS3R. I should check the voltage settings at FSB—it seems weak power might be the problem. If I can fix it with BIOS reprogramming and submerging it in water, then I'll buy an X5260 + RX, a pump, extra tubing, and zip ties to finish my custom waterloop. I plan to run 4.8 volts or higher.

B
BlueFyrre
Member
53
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM
#10
The previous GB board had significant sagging. It appeared as expected but didn’t function properly.
B
BlueFyrre
12-31-2016, 02:54 PM #10

The previous GB board had significant sagging. It appeared as expected but didn’t function properly.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next