F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Task Manager displays 8GB of RAM but also shows 16GB. Read the complete article!

Task Manager displays 8GB of RAM but also shows 16GB. Read the complete article!

Task Manager displays 8GB of RAM but also shows 16GB. Read the complete article!

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
P
Pipper1222
Member
187
09-10-2020, 06:50 AM
#11
I just restarted my computer to load the required program, and now it’s displaying the right RAM stats in Task Manager. I’ll keep going as scheduled. Looks like this confirms the problem isn’t consistent.
P
Pipper1222
09-10-2020, 06:50 AM #11

I just restarted my computer to load the required program, and now it’s displaying the right RAM stats in Task Manager. I’ll keep going as scheduled. Looks like this confirms the problem isn’t consistent.

H
Hockeybeast87
Member
138
09-10-2020, 08:22 AM
#12
Checking the other two DIMM slots to see if it works. If you're currently in slots 2 and 4, switching to 1 and 3 might also work depending on the configuration.
H
Hockeybeast87
09-10-2020, 08:22 AM #12

Checking the other two DIMM slots to see if it works. If you're currently in slots 2 and 4, switching to 1 and 3 might also work depending on the configuration.

S
SoyDash
Posting Freak
859
09-10-2020, 09:27 AM
#13
I couldn't launch MemTestx86 because it needed an external USB stick and I don’t have my flash drive. However, I managed to capture a screenshot from CPUZ’s memory tab. This photo was taken when all 16GB of RAM suddenly appeared and became functional again.
S
SoyDash
09-10-2020, 09:27 AM #13

I couldn't launch MemTestx86 because it needed an external USB stick and I don’t have my flash drive. However, I managed to capture a screenshot from CPUZ’s memory tab. This photo was taken when all 16GB of RAM suddenly appeared and became functional again.

R
rpb2003
Junior Member
11
09-10-2020, 05:57 PM
#14
It could have been resolved by simply reinserting the RAM. However, it might be useful to try all possible configurations in different slots to pinpoint the problem. The issue may have been minor debris or corrosion on the RAM pins or slot after cleaning.
R
rpb2003
09-10-2020, 05:57 PM #14

It could have been resolved by simply reinserting the RAM. However, it might be useful to try all possible configurations in different slots to pinpoint the problem. The issue may have been minor debris or corrosion on the RAM pins or slot after cleaning.

D
darkwolf644
Member
183
09-10-2020, 06:49 PM
#15
It's now operating near its intended speed, as shown in your initial screen capture—it was around 1333... Odd. Your system still has a half-gigabyte reserved, and I just verified that my allocation is 98MB. Unclear why the memory is being restricted.
D
darkwolf644
09-10-2020, 06:49 PM #15

It's now operating near its intended speed, as shown in your initial screen capture—it was around 1333... Odd. Your system still has a half-gigabyte reserved, and I just verified that my allocation is 98MB. Unclear why the memory is being restricted.

I
Im_Ban_evading
Junior Member
20
09-28-2020, 10:14 PM
#16
I
Im_Ban_evading
09-28-2020, 10:14 PM #16

U
Unyke
Member
146
09-28-2020, 10:36 PM
#17
Thank you very much for your guidance and support.
U
Unyke
09-28-2020, 10:36 PM #17

Thank you very much for your guidance and support.

R
Ryeseter
Junior Member
9
10-06-2020, 12:11 AM
#18
I checked my system and Task Manager indicates it's operating at 3200MHz even though it's using dual channels (essentially running at 1600MHz each). I'm not sure why yours is showing a single channel speed. Probably the RAM could be the issue, and it might be worth replacing it. The RAM is available at a good price.
R
Ryeseter
10-06-2020, 12:11 AM #18

I checked my system and Task Manager indicates it's operating at 3200MHz even though it's using dual channels (essentially running at 1600MHz each). I'm not sure why yours is showing a single channel speed. Probably the RAM could be the issue, and it might be worth replacing it. The RAM is available at a good price.

M
mikeinsaw
Member
162
10-06-2020, 01:58 AM
#19
Great! The RAM is likely the least trustworthy component here, since the rest are from well-known brands. Regarding the Corsair Vengeance RAM you mentioned, I don’t have personal opinions, but I can share general insights about its reputation and performance.
M
mikeinsaw
10-06-2020, 01:58 AM #19

Great! The RAM is likely the least trustworthy component here, since the rest are from well-known brands. Regarding the Corsair Vengeance RAM you mentioned, I don’t have personal opinions, but I can share general insights about its reputation and performance.

S
Sebluigi
Senior Member
727
10-06-2020, 12:22 PM
#20
I haven't worked with DDR4 vengeance RAM before, but I've used a DDR3 low-profile version for more than five years. I pushed it to its limits with an i7 4790k that was also overclocked, and it never stopped working. It seems the 2600 Ryzen model struggles above around 3000MHz—probably because of the 3000MHz limit mentioned by someone else. Don't invest in fast RAM that's heavily rated but offers little practical gain; it usually settles at 2133 or 2400 without extra features, and most kits I've tried reach 2933 with slightly relaxed timing.
S
Sebluigi
10-06-2020, 12:22 PM #20

I haven't worked with DDR4 vengeance RAM before, but I've used a DDR3 low-profile version for more than five years. I pushed it to its limits with an i7 4790k that was also overclocked, and it never stopped working. It seems the 2600 Ryzen model struggles above around 3000MHz—probably because of the 3000MHz limit mentioned by someone else. Don't invest in fast RAM that's heavily rated but offers little practical gain; it usually settles at 2133 or 2400 without extra features, and most kits I've tried reach 2933 with slightly relaxed timing.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next