F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming System Specifications Revealed

System Specifications Revealed

System Specifications Revealed

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
L
LuckitasCai_
Junior Member
14
09-26-2016, 07:54 AM
#1
PC Performance Check: Key Details
1. Software: Windows 10 Home 64-Bit
2. Mainboard: Dell Inspiron 530S
3. CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 @ 3.3 GHz
4. Graphics: Nvidia GeForce GT 1030
5. RAM: 4 x 1 GB DDR2 @ 800MHz
6. Storage: Kingston A400 120 GB (Windows) / Western Digital Black 720 GB (games)
At 1280x1024 resolution, the system ran all tested games smoothly, achieving at least 30 FPS. Notable titles included GTA V, The Witcher 3, DOOM, No Man's Sky, and Naruto Ultimate Ninja Storm 4. Some settings needed adjustment, especially for DOOM, but overall playability was strong.

These specifications met most demands, though the processor was notably weaker than expected.
Hardware specs seem inflated? Share your thoughts!
L
LuckitasCai_
09-26-2016, 07:54 AM #1

PC Performance Check: Key Details
1. Software: Windows 10 Home 64-Bit
2. Mainboard: Dell Inspiron 530S
3. CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 @ 3.3 GHz
4. Graphics: Nvidia GeForce GT 1030
5. RAM: 4 x 1 GB DDR2 @ 800MHz
6. Storage: Kingston A400 120 GB (Windows) / Western Digital Black 720 GB (games)
At 1280x1024 resolution, the system ran all tested games smoothly, achieving at least 30 FPS. Notable titles included GTA V, The Witcher 3, DOOM, No Man's Sky, and Naruto Ultimate Ninja Storm 4. Some settings needed adjustment, especially for DOOM, but overall playability was strong.

These specifications met most demands, though the processor was notably weaker than expected.
Hardware specs seem inflated? Share your thoughts!

K
KoriV
Junior Member
15
09-26-2016, 11:24 AM
#2
It's essential to boost the system specs, or else users might complain their machines can't handle the game.
K
KoriV
09-26-2016, 11:24 AM #2

It's essential to boost the system specs, or else users might complain their machines can't handle the game.

D
DriveIn
Senior Member
739
09-30-2016, 02:56 AM
#3
The suggested specs reflect what you’ll need for smooth performance without issues. Current titles are becoming more demanding, so your GTX 780—once a top choice—is now considered mid-range. Actual requirements can differ significantly depending on how smoothly you want the game to run.
D
DriveIn
09-30-2016, 02:56 AM #3

The suggested specs reflect what you’ll need for smooth performance without issues. Current titles are becoming more demanding, so your GTX 780—once a top choice—is now considered mid-range. Actual requirements can differ significantly depending on how smoothly you want the game to run.

S
Syzul
Junior Member
33
10-01-2016, 03:42 AM
#4
I understand your point, but the processor and RAM requirements were increased twice.
S
Syzul
10-01-2016, 03:42 AM #4

I understand your point, but the processor and RAM requirements were increased twice.

M
matsku25
Member
78
10-01-2016, 06:41 AM
#5
System specs needed: 64-bit OS, Windows 7 or 8.1, Intel Core i5 at 3.3 GHz or faster, AMD FX-8320, 8 GB RAM, Nvidia GTX 670 or AMD Radeon HD 7870 with 2GB VRAM, 6GB storage for HDD, Steam account, fast internet connection.
M
matsku25
10-01-2016, 06:41 AM #5

System specs needed: 64-bit OS, Windows 7 or 8.1, Intel Core i5 at 3.3 GHz or faster, AMD FX-8320, 8 GB RAM, Nvidia GTX 670 or AMD Radeon HD 7870 with 2GB VRAM, 6GB storage for HDD, Steam account, fast internet connection.

A
66
10-02-2016, 03:32 PM
#6
there are countless system setups making it nearly impossible for computers to share the same brands and configurations. my 2AC8 HP MOBO is using an AMD FX 8350, which can handle modern games on CPU-heavy titles, but I notice performance limits from the 8-core processor on a HP Gigabyte board.
A
AssassinsBacca
10-02-2016, 03:32 PM #6

there are countless system setups making it nearly impossible for computers to share the same brands and configurations. my 2AC8 HP MOBO is using an AMD FX 8350, which can handle modern games on CPU-heavy titles, but I notice performance limits from the 8-core processor on a HP Gigabyte board.

D
Dephixe
Junior Member
3
10-02-2016, 05:13 PM
#7
Fascinating result. These seem to be the baseline limits for 1080p gaming, while 1280x1024 offers significantly more resolution.
D
Dephixe
10-02-2016, 05:13 PM #7

Fascinating result. These seem to be the baseline limits for 1080p gaming, while 1280x1024 offers significantly more resolution.

F
flyer78
Senior Member
425
10-03-2016, 01:24 AM
#8
It makes perfect sense. With determination, you can achieve something you've never done before. I once used an i5 with a GTX 1060 (3GB) to maintain a steady 35 fps in GTA 5 at 4K resolution, and I didn’t lower all my settings—I kept many on high.
F
flyer78
10-03-2016, 01:24 AM #8

It makes perfect sense. With determination, you can achieve something you've never done before. I once used an i5 with a GTX 1060 (3GB) to maintain a steady 35 fps in GTA 5 at 4K resolution, and I didn’t lower all my settings—I kept many on high.

M
matt1theking
Junior Member
8
10-03-2016, 04:55 AM
#9
I’d think it’d be a good bet for around 720p quality.
M
matt1theking
10-03-2016, 04:55 AM #9

I’d think it’d be a good bet for around 720p quality.

N
nc432
Member
186
10-03-2016, 05:01 AM
#10
I appreciate the feedback! I would have chosen 1080p, but the screen only displayed 1280x1024. My graphics card managed to stretch it to 1920x1080, though it didn’t look as good. To be honest, the system seems limited in handling 1080p well. This test shows you don’t always need a full PC upgrade just to play a new game. It might not look perfect, but it works for basic play. The build cost was only $200.
N
nc432
10-03-2016, 05:01 AM #10

I appreciate the feedback! I would have chosen 1080p, but the screen only displayed 1280x1024. My graphics card managed to stretch it to 1920x1080, though it didn’t look as good. To be honest, the system seems limited in handling 1080p well. This test shows you don’t always need a full PC upgrade just to play a new game. It might not look perfect, but it works for basic play. The build cost was only $200.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next