Switch to a more powerful processor model
Switch to a more powerful processor model
You prefer the 3700x option, as it seems more affordable in the long run.
The 3700X is definitely the right choice, though the single-core gaming speed still aligns more closely with Intel's expectations than many assume. The extra value from its multi-core performance in a workstation setting is definitely worth it. One of the main issues I have with 9th generation Intel i5 chips is the absence of hyperthreading; I’d prefer an 8700K over a 9700K. An overclocked 8700K could even outperform the 9700K in multi-core tasks for a lower price. Between the two, the 3700X stands out as my top option.
Obtain a 3700x with a solid sub-$200 or $300 AM4 X570 board, then plan to upgrade to 3900x or 3950x after two years if needed. The price of the 3900x should fall to $400 or $300 after two years for 12C/24T models. The 3950x could drop to around $700 after two years, though this isn't certain.
If you had chosen the same motherboard, you might have picked the 9700K, but because Intel restricted compatibility even though they shared the same socket, the 3700X seems more appealing. The performance gap in multi-core tasks with the 8700K isn't always clear unless you push it to a stock 9700K, which would be an uneven comparison. Also, 8C/8T offers better stability than 6C/12T, removing risks of latency or performance drops (though this wouldn’t apply to a GTX 1060). That said, in everyday use the differences are minimal, though I suspect 8700Ks aren't significantly cheaper than the 9700K, so I wouldn’t recommend it as a better value.