F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Support for subtle performance boosts.

Support for subtle performance boosts.

Support for subtle performance boosts.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
L
Lips
Senior Member
624
07-18-2016, 05:29 AM
#1
I’m looking to improve my setup for a gaming experience. I’m not a tech expert, but I want the best performance possible. My current PC is a few years old and has been used heavily, so I can’t upgrade the hardware. I’d like to push the RAM as far as it allows, with a bit of overclocking, without risking damage to my existing cooler. I’m aiming for around 30 FPS in a Unity game, especially since particle effects run on the CPU rather than being multi-core optimized. The game I’m interested in is "From the Depths," a voxel and mechanical building title with multiplayer support. It seems the requirements might be a bit confusing, as some users report older systems failing. Right now my setup has a mid-range processor, 16GB of DDR3 memory, and an ASUS ENGTX260 graphics card. The RAM is a 64MB module, which is right in the sweet spot but could benefit from a boost. I’m hoping that increasing the RAM speed and tweaking it slightly will help. Any tips or advice would be greatly appreciated.
L
Lips
07-18-2016, 05:29 AM #1

I’m looking to improve my setup for a gaming experience. I’m not a tech expert, but I want the best performance possible. My current PC is a few years old and has been used heavily, so I can’t upgrade the hardware. I’d like to push the RAM as far as it allows, with a bit of overclocking, without risking damage to my existing cooler. I’m aiming for around 30 FPS in a Unity game, especially since particle effects run on the CPU rather than being multi-core optimized. The game I’m interested in is "From the Depths," a voxel and mechanical building title with multiplayer support. It seems the requirements might be a bit confusing, as some users report older systems failing. Right now my setup has a mid-range processor, 16GB of DDR3 memory, and an ASUS ENGTX260 graphics card. The RAM is a 64MB module, which is right in the sweet spot but could benefit from a boost. I’m hoping that increasing the RAM speed and tweaking it slightly will help. Any tips or advice would be greatly appreciated.

V
Vesgo
Member
230
07-18-2016, 09:57 AM
#2
Avoid pushing the memory beyond its limits—it won’t provide any benefit. It depends on whether your CPU is restricted. My old FX4100 could reach around +13 to +213 MHz depending on settings. Adjust the multiplier accordingly. If it’s unlocked, start with a multiplier of 4.2GHz and increase gradually. Keep an eye on temperatures; if they rise too much, lower the voltage slightly at a time. After each change, run a stress test to ensure stability. Also consider boosting your GPU’s FPS by overclocking it significantly. Download tools like MSI Afterburner and slowly raise both clock and memory until you notice instability. Good luck!
V
Vesgo
07-18-2016, 09:57 AM #2

Avoid pushing the memory beyond its limits—it won’t provide any benefit. It depends on whether your CPU is restricted. My old FX4100 could reach around +13 to +213 MHz depending on settings. Adjust the multiplier accordingly. If it’s unlocked, start with a multiplier of 4.2GHz and increase gradually. Keep an eye on temperatures; if they rise too much, lower the voltage slightly at a time. After each change, run a stress test to ensure stability. Also consider boosting your GPU’s FPS by overclocking it significantly. Download tools like MSI Afterburner and slowly raise both clock and memory until you notice instability. Good luck!

E
Eduardo_GameOn
Posting Freak
921
07-27-2016, 12:53 AM
#3
It seems you're facing challenges achieving the desired performance boost. The GPU you have might not be compatible with Windows 10, making it impossible to upgrade. Additionally, 700 series NVIDIA cards are limited by the available drivers on that operating system.
E
Eduardo_GameOn
07-27-2016, 12:53 AM #3

It seems you're facing challenges achieving the desired performance boost. The GPU you have might not be compatible with Windows 10, making it impossible to upgrade. Additionally, 700 series NVIDIA cards are limited by the available drivers on that operating system.

D
Dustyn1001
Member
194
08-01-2016, 12:32 PM
#4
Unclear what you're referring to by worth overclocking. If your lower-end chip works at 4.4, why not push it further? It shouldn't fail if voltage isn't increased too much. I'm in agreement with Projectpatatoe—you definitely need a better PC. He's correct about your GPU no longer being supported.
D
Dustyn1001
08-01-2016, 12:32 PM #4

Unclear what you're referring to by worth overclocking. If your lower-end chip works at 4.4, why not push it further? It shouldn't fail if voltage isn't increased too much. I'm in agreement with Projectpatatoe—you definitely need a better PC. He's correct about your GPU no longer being supported.

S
ScopeZMLG
Member
50
08-04-2016, 05:08 PM
#5
Running on Windows 7 with DirectX 9 lock still active.
S
ScopeZMLG
08-04-2016, 05:08 PM #5

Running on Windows 7 with DirectX 9 lock still active.

M
Minecraft4you
Member
58
08-11-2016, 11:14 AM
#6
Sure, I'll proceed with OCing to 4.2 ghz.
M
Minecraft4you
08-11-2016, 11:14 AM #6

Sure, I'll proceed with OCing to 4.2 ghz.

E
EeveeBoy64
Member
171
08-11-2016, 04:24 PM
#7
I notice some confusion in the comments. 1: Using OC on RAM can provide a small boost, but it won't make a huge difference. The type of RAM you choose matters too. The specifications mentioned likely won’t yield much improvement unless you use compatible modules. Generally, around 1600 should be achievable with most DDR3 RAM. 2: AM3+ FX processors are fully unlocked; AMD never released an AM3+ FX chip that was restricted. AM3 chips can be either locked or unlocked depending on the model—examples include the 960T, 555 BE, 720 BE, and 1100T. AM3+ only has a few locked variants, mainly the Opteron series, not regular FX chips. 3: FX processors benefit from a combination of CPU multiplier and bus speed for optimal performance. Simply increasing the multiplier helps but can cause throttling and overheating. The motherboard isn’t particularly strong for OC attempts, but it’s worth considering if possible. It’s about adapting to what you have and making the best of the situation. I’ve faced similar situations before—hope this helps!
E
EeveeBoy64
08-11-2016, 04:24 PM #7

I notice some confusion in the comments. 1: Using OC on RAM can provide a small boost, but it won't make a huge difference. The type of RAM you choose matters too. The specifications mentioned likely won’t yield much improvement unless you use compatible modules. Generally, around 1600 should be achievable with most DDR3 RAM. 2: AM3+ FX processors are fully unlocked; AMD never released an AM3+ FX chip that was restricted. AM3 chips can be either locked or unlocked depending on the model—examples include the 960T, 555 BE, 720 BE, and 1100T. AM3+ only has a few locked variants, mainly the Opteron series, not regular FX chips. 3: FX processors benefit from a combination of CPU multiplier and bus speed for optimal performance. Simply increasing the multiplier helps but can cause throttling and overheating. The motherboard isn’t particularly strong for OC attempts, but it’s worth considering if possible. It’s about adapting to what you have and making the best of the situation. I’ve faced similar situations before—hope this helps!

T
TEDmister95
Member
55
08-12-2016, 11:38 PM
#8
I'm still giggling with pie-eyes after seeing that fx4300 benchmark, 20 seconds or not that's impressive *clap* The primary issues is a game, playable by others on low end pc's, is running to processor to %95-%100 and there is a huge gap between input, and when the screen finally snaps to it's destination. There is no smooth transition, just a 3-5 second gap and then it shows wherever I'm looking. Tried setting the nvidia physx to GPU, CPU, updated driver, and it's slightly better but unplayable. My OC experience is minimal. I want NB bridge to stay at 2k, I'm shooting for 4 ghz as my cooler is worn, and it's black. I'm guessing 4.2 is a good place to start, I can always dial it back. So BIOS, turn off all manual cooling and IDE/auto options to off.. Bus speed 225 and 18/18.5 multiplier seem like a decent start? Voltage to 1.3-1.35?
T
TEDmister95
08-12-2016, 11:38 PM #8

I'm still giggling with pie-eyes after seeing that fx4300 benchmark, 20 seconds or not that's impressive *clap* The primary issues is a game, playable by others on low end pc's, is running to processor to %95-%100 and there is a huge gap between input, and when the screen finally snaps to it's destination. There is no smooth transition, just a 3-5 second gap and then it shows wherever I'm looking. Tried setting the nvidia physx to GPU, CPU, updated driver, and it's slightly better but unplayable. My OC experience is minimal. I want NB bridge to stay at 2k, I'm shooting for 4 ghz as my cooler is worn, and it's black. I'm guessing 4.2 is a good place to start, I can always dial it back. So BIOS, turn off all manual cooling and IDE/auto options to off.. Bus speed 225 and 18/18.5 multiplier seem like a decent start? Voltage to 1.3-1.35?

I
iAzoZ_
Member
51
08-13-2016, 03:20 AM
#9
Around 1.40v's and 4.0GHz works well as a starting point. The CPU-NB can reach 2400 without problems, which slightly enhances RAM speed. You can run it stock voltage for some chips, though you might need to adjust it a bit—around 1.20v should work easily. But the main issue here is your graphics card. I’m not confident any adjustments will help with an older card like this. A newer or more powerful card would be the biggest improvement you can make. Also, I’m unsure if the game uses multiple cores; most modern titles are close to that. If it’s a 4-core FX, it should probably not overheat much. Upgrading the graphics is likely the only real solution. Until then, tweak what you can, but don’t push the system too far. A slow setup still beats nothing.
I
iAzoZ_
08-13-2016, 03:20 AM #9

Around 1.40v's and 4.0GHz works well as a starting point. The CPU-NB can reach 2400 without problems, which slightly enhances RAM speed. You can run it stock voltage for some chips, though you might need to adjust it a bit—around 1.20v should work easily. But the main issue here is your graphics card. I’m not confident any adjustments will help with an older card like this. A newer or more powerful card would be the biggest improvement you can make. Also, I’m unsure if the game uses multiple cores; most modern titles are close to that. If it’s a 4-core FX, it should probably not overheat much. Upgrading the graphics is likely the only real solution. Until then, tweak what you can, but don’t push the system too far. A slow setup still beats nothing.

A
Akrasia
Member
225
08-13-2016, 05:13 AM
#10
I’m having trouble changing my system bus right now (previously it worked, but I’m not sure what’s different). I set the multiplyer to 4.38 and adjusted it to 2400, yet the tutorial still didn’t finish in that game. The forums suggest most complex math happens on the CPU via Unity, so I had to request a refund. Thank you all for your support.
A
Akrasia
08-13-2016, 05:13 AM #10

I’m having trouble changing my system bus right now (previously it worked, but I’m not sure what’s different). I set the multiplyer to 4.38 and adjusted it to 2400, yet the tutorial still didn’t finish in that game. The forums suggest most complex math happens on the CPU via Unity, so I had to request a refund. Thank you all for your support.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next