F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop SSD DIY NAS?

SSD DIY NAS?

SSD DIY NAS?

M
MrZezeu
Member
57
10-10-2016, 02:54 PM
#1
I need to consolidate data at home since I use various devices daily and I’m tired of moving files to external drives.
I prefer something compact and quiet so it can be placed on my desk without needing external storage solutions.
I don’t want to convert files because my devices can handle media independently, and I’m used to SSD performance without major speed loss.
I think a ready-made device would be best, but I lack experience.
Regarding SSD NAS options, I’ve seen QNAP TBS-464 and Asustor Flashstor 6, but they’re difficult to obtain locally, expensive, and I’m not confident in their quality.
I don’t care much about appearance, but the Asustor seems like a cheap plastic product, which makes me doubt its reliability.
It seems building my own NAS might be the way, but I’m unsure which components are suitable for this purpose since I only built regular PCs before.
From what I understand, I just need an efficient CPU, not a powerful one, and I have no clear direction beyond that.
I considered choosing an i3 processor, but there aren’t many in ITX form factor with the required features, especially for a QUAD NVMe PCIe adapter.
Perhaps a more suitable CPU exists with a compatible motherboard?
I imagined a setup with four SSDs inside a 4-5L case and really hope it’s feasible, but I’m not sure if I’m imagining too much.
M
MrZezeu
10-10-2016, 02:54 PM #1

I need to consolidate data at home since I use various devices daily and I’m tired of moving files to external drives.
I prefer something compact and quiet so it can be placed on my desk without needing external storage solutions.
I don’t want to convert files because my devices can handle media independently, and I’m used to SSD performance without major speed loss.
I think a ready-made device would be best, but I lack experience.
Regarding SSD NAS options, I’ve seen QNAP TBS-464 and Asustor Flashstor 6, but they’re difficult to obtain locally, expensive, and I’m not confident in their quality.
I don’t care much about appearance, but the Asustor seems like a cheap plastic product, which makes me doubt its reliability.
It seems building my own NAS might be the way, but I’m unsure which components are suitable for this purpose since I only built regular PCs before.
From what I understand, I just need an efficient CPU, not a powerful one, and I have no clear direction beyond that.
I considered choosing an i3 processor, but there aren’t many in ITX form factor with the required features, especially for a QUAD NVMe PCIe adapter.
Perhaps a more suitable CPU exists with a compatible motherboard?
I imagined a setup with four SSDs inside a 4-5L case and really hope it’s feasible, but I’m not sure if I’m imagining too much.

M
MarioDX49
Junior Member
22
10-10-2016, 11:28 PM
#2
The speed of SSDs depends on the network connection. You won't achieve SSD performance.
M
MarioDX49
10-10-2016, 11:28 PM #2

The speed of SSDs depends on the network connection. You won't achieve SSD performance.

E
Eusebio06
Senior Member
595
10-11-2016, 01:05 AM
#3
If needed, I understand the speed limitations; the aim is only to minimize them where possible. If you mean the network could become a bottleneck at HDD speeds, there are factors like noise and size that still point me toward an SSD solution as the best choice.

I’m not seeking a detailed parts list, just a general starting point. It’s hard for me to locate suitable motherboard and CPU pairings for a NAS, particularly regarding energy use and acceptable performance levels. I also want to verify if using a PCIe adapter for NVMe drives is actually viable or if it’s just a misunderstanding.
E
Eusebio06
10-11-2016, 01:05 AM #3

If needed, I understand the speed limitations; the aim is only to minimize them where possible. If you mean the network could become a bottleneck at HDD speeds, there are factors like noise and size that still point me toward an SSD solution as the best choice.

I’m not seeking a detailed parts list, just a general starting point. It’s hard for me to locate suitable motherboard and CPU pairings for a NAS, particularly regarding energy use and acceptable performance levels. I also want to verify if using a PCIe adapter for NVMe drives is actually viable or if it’s just a misunderstanding.

D
Dragonosis
Member
51
10-11-2016, 01:02 PM
#4
NAS storage remains focused on HDDs because of the balance between size and cost. I own a QNAP device that's been running for about seven years, with roughly 95TB stored or connected to it. Setting it up again with NVMe drives would cost over $10k without any performance improvement. Plus, the 4-bay QNAP enclosure is quite compact.
D
Dragonosis
10-11-2016, 01:02 PM #4

NAS storage remains focused on HDDs because of the balance between size and cost. I own a QNAP device that's been running for about seven years, with roughly 95TB stored or connected to it. Setting it up again with NVMe drives would cost over $10k without any performance improvement. Plus, the 4-bay QNAP enclosure is quite compact.

X
Xnick10000
Junior Member
41
10-15-2016, 07:33 AM
#5
If you recognize the speed limitations, then NVMe would be unnecessary.
Examine the CPUs used by commercial NAS providers—it's typically the lowest-end models, such as the N or J Intel CPUs with four cores, which don't need active cooling.
I would consider "embedded motherboards" next.
X
Xnick10000
10-15-2016, 07:33 AM #5

If you recognize the speed limitations, then NVMe would be unnecessary.
Examine the CPUs used by commercial NAS providers—it's typically the lowest-end models, such as the N or J Intel CPUs with four cores, which don't need active cooling.
I would consider "embedded motherboards" next.