F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Spectrix D80 3600 CL17 model with memory OC capability

Spectrix D80 3600 CL17 model with memory OC capability

Spectrix D80 3600 CL17 model with memory OC capability

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
D
DroyTheSloth
Member
132
09-11-2019, 03:17 AM
#11
I possess a different unit featuring 3600mhz cl17. It handled the overclock and RAM adjustments well, reaching 1867 and 3733 CL16. Latency remains stable at around 65.2±1.
D
DroyTheSloth
09-11-2019, 03:17 AM #11

I possess a different unit featuring 3600mhz cl17. It handled the overclock and RAM adjustments well, reaching 1867 and 3733 CL16. Latency remains stable at around 65.2±1.

P
101
09-13-2019, 03:45 AM
#12
I will try these values.
P
pvpzkiller4791
09-13-2019, 03:45 AM #12

I will try these values.

I
163
09-13-2019, 06:11 PM
#13
It's recommended to download Typhoon and save your RAM's XMP settings, then import them into DrMaker for a personalized calculation. Your PCB being on Rev A0 could make it more suitable than others.
I
Irontaildragon
09-13-2019, 06:11 PM #13

It's recommended to download Typhoon and save your RAM's XMP settings, then import them into DrMaker for a personalized calculation. Your PCB being on Rev A0 could make it more suitable than others.

B
BaccaStrq123
Senior Member
664
09-15-2019, 01:42 PM
#14
Tested 3733 recently and everything appears to function properly.
B
BaccaStrq123
09-15-2019, 01:42 PM #14

Tested 3733 recently and everything appears to function properly.

K
Kallo15
Junior Member
38
09-30-2019, 06:23 PM
#15
K
Kallo15
09-30-2019, 06:23 PM #15

M
minecrafter_14
Junior Member
39
10-16-2019, 06:30 PM
#16
Two memtest setups were created: one nearing 100% capacity with no errors, the other at 60% with no errors. This meets your requirements.
M
minecrafter_14
10-16-2019, 06:30 PM #16

Two memtest setups were created: one nearing 100% capacity with no errors, the other at 60% with no errors. This meets your requirements.

M
marcoclovio58
Junior Member
44
10-19-2019, 02:41 PM
#17
It's interesting you noticed that setting with rn gave a higher latency. The difference is just 0.5, which might not seem much but could matter for stability. I'd go with the 65.2 setting to ensure reliability.
M
marcoclovio58
10-19-2019, 02:41 PM #17

It's interesting you noticed that setting with rn gave a higher latency. The difference is just 0.5, which might not seem much but could matter for stability. I'd go with the 65.2 setting to ensure reliability.

R
RizapS
Member
135
10-19-2019, 04:41 PM
#18
I'm seeing 65.9-66ns here, which should be sufficient for hitting 155fps in games such as BF1, BFV, and COD MW.
R
RizapS
10-19-2019, 04:41 PM #18

I'm seeing 65.9-66ns here, which should be sufficient for hitting 155fps in games such as BF1, BFV, and COD MW.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2