Someone claimed that saying Ubuntu is stable is stupid.
Someone claimed that saying Ubuntu is stable is stupid.
I'm really struggling right now. My friend switched me to Ubuntu on my Windows machine, but it's not working properly. The Bluetooth isn't connecting, the earphones are dead, and Wi-Fi too. I've tried everything from commands like rfkill list to other fixes, but nothing helps. It's frustrating because my speakers need Wi-Fi and I don't really need them, but since the earphones won't work, I'm thinking about using the aux jack instead—but that won't work either. This is getting annoying. I've been using this laptop for six months already, and I feel like everyone who says it's stable is wrong. My frustration is real, and I hope you understand.
This operating system functions well on most devices but struggles with many machines. Its design is tailored specifically for hardware support! I've tested this "operating system" multiple times across various versions and computers. It consistently underperforms compared to Windows, often showing instability, high CPU temperatures during idle time, and a limited set of customizable settings. It's more of a convenient tool for casual users than a robust platform. For those who mainly browse the web, it might suffice, but it isn't ideal for demanding tasks.
From my perspective, Ubuntu performs exceptionally across all systems. Hardware compatibility is essential for kernels. An operating system encompasses more than just a kernel. Linux powers major platforms like AWS, Google Cloud, Cloudflare, Facebook’s services, and most supercomputers.
Perhaps, but the focus is on end-users. It doesn't really suit them. For connecting with other machines—maybe. For network tasks—definitely. As a self-contained operating system managing certain processes and users rarely interact with—absolutely. But we're dealing with typical users who face the same issues repeatedly for years! And nearly every Ubuntu distribution is almost the same.
It seems you're suggesting staying on Windows/Mac until you're more experienced. It's not about saying one operating system is better than the other, but about compatibility and readiness. I've used Linux as my router/NVR with good stability—about 60 days uptime since a recent reboot when I relocated the NVR. Have you updated any software after installing Ubuntu? Maybe connect a LAN cable to refresh drivers or packages.
I keep facing the same issues with Windows repeatedly. It installs unwanted ads and spyware, slows down updates, resets settings during installations, and uses up a lot of disk space, making computers hard to use for long after updates. It works fine as a gaming OS, but it’s not suitable for everyday tasks.
I'm a big fan of Mac, but I've only used it for a year now. It's not great for understanding how computers or operating systems work—just basic stuff like social media. For most people, Mac isn't really needed; Windows is way more common. I've heard that about 70% of laptops don't support Mac properly, and even if you manage to install something, it often doesn't work well. My HP 4540 was one of those rare cases where everything worked except Wi-Fi. After changing the card, it fixed itself. I prefer Windows because Mac feels more like a game than a real computer OS. You might be a Linux newbie, but you're not really interested in learning that. I actually used Ubuntu on my server with 434 days of uptime—no reboots! That's solid. Linux can be frustrating if the user side isn't good. P.S. Make sure you installed the right distribution; maybe Manjaro is better for you.