F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop should I wait for i9 10900k?

should I wait for i9 10900k?

should I wait for i9 10900k?

M
MavrosGR
Senior Member
579
02-21-2020, 05:02 PM
#1
Consider your needs and budget. The i9 10900K offers better performance, while the 9900K provides a more affordable option. Decide based on what matters most to you.
M
MavrosGR
02-21-2020, 05:02 PM #1

Consider your needs and budget. The i9 10900K offers better performance, while the 9900K provides a more affordable option. Decide based on what matters most to you.

T
Teddy_Ben
Member
127
02-21-2020, 07:20 PM
#2
Consider upgrading to a solid Zen3 processor instead of the outdated 9900K. The 4700X and 4900X are coming soon, so it's best to invest now.
T
Teddy_Ben
02-21-2020, 07:20 PM #2

Consider upgrading to a solid Zen3 processor instead of the outdated 9900K. The 4700X and 4900X are coming soon, so it's best to invest now.

I
Infinity_Angel
Junior Member
5
02-22-2020, 02:41 AM
#3
Are you sure you need a new CPU right now? Your existing setup might still work well enough to wait for the next release. If your system is unstable or failing, it’s better to get whatever’s available immediately—upgrading isn’t necessary if your current rig is handling.
I
Infinity_Angel
02-22-2020, 02:41 AM #3

Are you sure you need a new CPU right now? Your existing setup might still work well enough to wait for the next release. If your system is unstable or failing, it’s better to get whatever’s available immediately—upgrading isn’t necessary if your current rig is handling.

A
ash_n_brad
Posting Freak
778
02-22-2020, 05:01 AM
#4
consider the 9900k because it offers better performance than 3700x/3900x in certain games thanks to optimisation and higher frequency. both Ryzen and Intel are more affordable options, while the 3900x provides a higher core count and thread count. As @manikyath mentioned, opt for 3700x/3900x if your system is extremely difficult to run smoothly on. If you have time, a Ryzen 4000 or Intel 10th gen might work well, but results depend on upcoming third-party benchmarks.
A
ash_n_brad
02-22-2020, 05:01 AM #4

consider the 9900k because it offers better performance than 3700x/3900x in certain games thanks to optimisation and higher frequency. both Ryzen and Intel are more affordable options, while the 3900x provides a higher core count and thread count. As @manikyath mentioned, opt for 3700x/3900x if your system is extremely difficult to run smoothly on. If you have time, a Ryzen 4000 or Intel 10th gen might work well, but results depend on upcoming third-party benchmarks.

R
Repusha
Member
54
02-22-2020, 11:02 AM
#5
If you want yourself a nice 550$ 300W room heater (and have an appropriate cooling system for it), yeah, it's good, otherwise i'd rather wait for Zen 3.
R
Repusha
02-22-2020, 11:02 AM #5

If you want yourself a nice 550$ 300W room heater (and have an appropriate cooling system for it), yeah, it's good, otherwise i'd rather wait for Zen 3.

R
Ramo612
Junior Member
48
02-22-2020, 01:12 PM
#6
Aim for the 9900k—it's incredibly powerful, but you require a premium air/water cooler to keep up.
R
Ramo612
02-22-2020, 01:12 PM #6

Aim for the 9900k—it's incredibly powerful, but you require a premium air/water cooler to keep up.

S
SpherousX
Member
74
02-22-2020, 09:15 PM
#7
There are several factors to think about when looking at a 9900k processor today. It really depends on how you plan to use your computer. For serious gamers, this CPU remains one of the top choices available and it doesn’t match performance levels in 2020 (though its longevity is uncertain as games increasingly require more cores). In older titles like simulation games (such as iRacing), which typically use only three cores, it still holds value. Even in modern games, most don’t rely heavily on more than eight cores. I’m not convinced that justifies its extremely high cost. On the flip side, AMD components lose much of their worth over time while Intel parts retain significant value. A Ryzen 1800x is roughly $150–160 for used on eBay, whereas an i7 7700k can fetch $250 or more.
S
SpherousX
02-22-2020, 09:15 PM #7

There are several factors to think about when looking at a 9900k processor today. It really depends on how you plan to use your computer. For serious gamers, this CPU remains one of the top choices available and it doesn’t match performance levels in 2020 (though its longevity is uncertain as games increasingly require more cores). In older titles like simulation games (such as iRacing), which typically use only three cores, it still holds value. Even in modern games, most don’t rely heavily on more than eight cores. I’m not convinced that justifies its extremely high cost. On the flip side, AMD components lose much of their worth over time while Intel parts retain significant value. A Ryzen 1800x is roughly $150–160 for used on eBay, whereas an i7 7700k can fetch $250 or more.

C
CinderMagus
Junior Member
19
02-23-2020, 06:03 AM
#8
I’d likely stick with something else unless it clearly outperforms my needs and I can afford it. Regarding resale value, the performance per instruction from recent generations hasn’t dropped much—what’s good today still holds up well across many models. Intel’s 7th-gen chips are still strong in gaming, and most modern i5/i7 from the second generation onward perform similarly. AMD has made significant improvements since the first gen, especially in memory support, speed, and core counts.
C
CinderMagus
02-23-2020, 06:03 AM #8

I’d likely stick with something else unless it clearly outperforms my needs and I can afford it. Regarding resale value, the performance per instruction from recent generations hasn’t dropped much—what’s good today still holds up well across many models. Intel’s 7th-gen chips are still strong in gaming, and most modern i5/i7 from the second generation onward perform similarly. AMD has made significant improvements since the first gen, especially in memory support, speed, and core counts.