F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Should I stay or should I go

Should I stay or should I go

Should I stay or should I go

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
D
DroyTheSloth
Member
132
08-08-2016, 10:19 PM
#1
As November draws near and my old system ages, I’m planning to upgrade to a new PC after ten years. The last time I wanted to play a game, I didn’t meet the required score, so I’m looking for a better fit. For the past year, Debian has been my daily operating system, and I’m very satisfied with it. It really enhances my experience, and I feel like an advanced user—writing scripts, troubleshooting, and knowing where to look when things go wrong. With this new machine, I’m considering switching to Arch Linux because of its rolling release model. Besides the stylish t-shirt I can wear, I think the frequent updates could be beneficial for gaming. However, I’ve heard Arch tends to crash every couple of months, which might be a concern. Since I’m new to it, I’m unsure about the long-term maintenance time. What are your thoughts?
D
DroyTheSloth
08-08-2016, 10:19 PM #1

As November draws near and my old system ages, I’m planning to upgrade to a new PC after ten years. The last time I wanted to play a game, I didn’t meet the required score, so I’m looking for a better fit. For the past year, Debian has been my daily operating system, and I’m very satisfied with it. It really enhances my experience, and I feel like an advanced user—writing scripts, troubleshooting, and knowing where to look when things go wrong. With this new machine, I’m considering switching to Arch Linux because of its rolling release model. Besides the stylish t-shirt I can wear, I think the frequent updates could be beneficial for gaming. However, I’ve heard Arch tends to crash every couple of months, which might be a concern. Since I’m new to it, I’m unsure about the long-term maintenance time. What are your thoughts?

D
doomddomp
Member
98
08-08-2016, 11:24 PM
#2
For an architecture similar to Arch, consider Manjaro. It includes an installer, supports a rolling release, but runs slightly behind Arch for more consistent updates. Unless you're into installing OSes or contributing bug reports on cutting-edge software, Arch isn't ideal. To experience it safely, try using a VM for a while.
D
doomddomp
08-08-2016, 11:24 PM #2

For an architecture similar to Arch, consider Manjaro. It includes an installer, supports a rolling release, but runs slightly behind Arch for more consistent updates. Unless you're into installing OSes or contributing bug reports on cutting-edge software, Arch isn't ideal. To experience it safely, try using a VM for a while.

M
Minigunner500
Member
235
08-15-2016, 12:05 AM
#3
There would be little benefit beyond a small edge, and it’s more about chance than the release schedule. Regular updates are essential. Problems can arise if you delay updates for long and then perform a full install without checking important notices on the official site. It’s clear that sticking to a rolling release without maintaining isn’t practical. Main repositories tend to stay stable, though they might create issues with third-party tools that aren’t kept current.
M
Minigunner500
08-15-2016, 12:05 AM #3

There would be little benefit beyond a small edge, and it’s more about chance than the release schedule. Regular updates are essential. Problems can arise if you delay updates for long and then perform a full install without checking important notices on the official site. It’s clear that sticking to a rolling release without maintaining isn’t practical. Main repositories tend to stay stable, though they might create issues with third-party tools that aren’t kept current.

Z
Zylan26
Junior Member
5
08-22-2016, 11:13 PM
#4
Arch doesn't usually crash every two months and often matches Debian's stability. In reality, you can achieve Drbian stability on modern hardware, though performance may vary with new network chips and Wi-Fi cards. Your AMD 6000 series GPU and NVIDIA 3K series support drivers, and even Intel Arc GPU works reasonably well with a 5.10 kernel. Still, every distribution has its quirks. The key difference is that with Arch you're more likely to handle the issues yourself.
Z
Zylan26
08-22-2016, 11:13 PM #4

Arch doesn't usually crash every two months and often matches Debian's stability. In reality, you can achieve Drbian stability on modern hardware, though performance may vary with new network chips and Wi-Fi cards. Your AMD 6000 series GPU and NVIDIA 3K series support drivers, and even Intel Arc GPU works reasonably well with a 5.10 kernel. Still, every distribution has its quirks. The key difference is that with Arch you're more likely to handle the issues yourself.

A
aloupasg2000
Junior Member
4
08-25-2016, 03:05 PM
#5
I prefer Garuda and its arch features. It’s great for gaming right out of the box.
A
aloupasg2000
08-25-2016, 03:05 PM #5

I prefer Garuda and its arch features. It’s great for gaming right out of the box.

W
willguMC
Member
74
08-31-2016, 04:22 AM
#6
Debian has distinct traits that appeal to me; I tend to prefer derivative systems because they can feel restrictive, often leading people to revert to the default root distribution they come from. For RPM-based distros, root would technically belong to Redhat or Fedora, which isn’t feasible. If you want Arch Linux, go for it—but avoid overly simplified versions. I don’t claim Debian is difficult, just that it demands more technical know-how than most alternatives. Having "man [problem software]" handy is already part of your toolkit. While Arch may not match Gentoo’s flexibility in blending cutting-edge and stable components, the idea of customizing your system is still possible. In six months, Debian testing might offer greater stability than most other branches, making it a safer choice for everyday use while letting you experiment with upgrades.
W
willguMC
08-31-2016, 04:22 AM #6

Debian has distinct traits that appeal to me; I tend to prefer derivative systems because they can feel restrictive, often leading people to revert to the default root distribution they come from. For RPM-based distros, root would technically belong to Redhat or Fedora, which isn’t feasible. If you want Arch Linux, go for it—but avoid overly simplified versions. I don’t claim Debian is difficult, just that it demands more technical know-how than most alternatives. Having "man [problem software]" handy is already part of your toolkit. While Arch may not match Gentoo’s flexibility in blending cutting-edge and stable components, the idea of customizing your system is still possible. In six months, Debian testing might offer greater stability than most other branches, making it a safer choice for everyday use while letting you experiment with upgrades.

V
Viizion_PvPz
Senior Member
670
08-31-2016, 06:25 AM
#7
You'll likely run Arch for over five years with minimal issues if you're comfortable with Linux and prefer a reliable setup. I personally lean toward Void Linux for its technical consistency and the absence of systemd, which improves responsiveness and speeds up boot times.
V
Viizion_PvPz
08-31-2016, 06:25 AM #7

You'll likely run Arch for over five years with minimal issues if you're comfortable with Linux and prefer a reliable setup. I personally lean toward Void Linux for its technical consistency and the absence of systemd, which improves responsiveness and speeds up boot times.

R
RoyalShine
Member
143
08-31-2016, 08:11 AM
#8
If you're into gaming, Nobara is a solid choice. Developed by Glorious Egroll, it runs on Fedora and offers many conveniences that help you get started quickly, along with several built-in optimizations. It feels like a modern option that balances stability and innovation, providing newer features without the risk of breaking during updates.
R
RoyalShine
08-31-2016, 08:11 AM #8

If you're into gaming, Nobara is a solid choice. Developed by Glorious Egroll, it runs on Fedora and offers many conveniences that help you get started quickly, along with several built-in optimizations. It feels like a modern option that balances stability and innovation, providing newer features without the risk of breaking during updates.

I
74
09-01-2016, 12:39 PM
#9
My experience with Arch Expectation: I can tailor everything, it feels amazing. I installed many default packages that came pre-installed on other distros, wasting a lot of time trying to make them look like the others. The lack of customization made it hard to achieve a visually appealing setup. Eventually, I just picked theme packs from my own collection. Now I prefer fully-featured distros like Ubuntu or Fedora, or Manjaro if I want something different.
I
ICEbreaker_MC_
09-01-2016, 12:39 PM #9

My experience with Arch Expectation: I can tailor everything, it feels amazing. I installed many default packages that came pre-installed on other distros, wasting a lot of time trying to make them look like the others. The lack of customization made it hard to achieve a visually appealing setup. Eventually, I just picked theme packs from my own collection. Now I prefer fully-featured distros like Ubuntu or Fedora, or Manjaro if I want something different.

F
FunCow43
Junior Member
9
09-01-2016, 08:06 PM
#10
EndeavourOS seeks out the arch area frequently, but doesn't rely on the same repos as Manjaro.
F
FunCow43
09-01-2016, 08:06 PM #10

EndeavourOS seeks out the arch area frequently, but doesn't rely on the same repos as Manjaro.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next