F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Short clip reviewing gameplay and performance for Call of Duty AW.

Short clip reviewing gameplay and performance for Call of Duty AW.

Short clip reviewing gameplay and performance for Call of Duty AW.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
D
Donald_Trumpz
Member
246
05-11-2016, 08:42 PM
#1
Hey everyone! I just recorded a short clip showing all the key stats displayed on screen—frame rates, VRAM consumption, RAM usage, CPU load per thread, etc. Everything is running at its peak. The GPU is GTX 780, and the CPU is an i7-4770K clocked at 4.2GHZ. Here’s what you need for optimal performance: around 8GB RAM (though 6 would work, but 4GB is risky), 3GB VRAM for 1080p, and utilizing all 8 CPU threads—possibly more than I can test right now. The game runs smoothly with high frame rates, the graphics are stunning, and it looks incredibly polished compared to previous titles. The textures and lighting effects are truly impressive.
D
Donald_Trumpz
05-11-2016, 08:42 PM #1

Hey everyone! I just recorded a short clip showing all the key stats displayed on screen—frame rates, VRAM consumption, RAM usage, CPU load per thread, etc. Everything is running at its peak. The GPU is GTX 780, and the CPU is an i7-4770K clocked at 4.2GHZ. Here’s what you need for optimal performance: around 8GB RAM (though 6 would work, but 4GB is risky), 3GB VRAM for 1080p, and utilizing all 8 CPU threads—possibly more than I can test right now. The game runs smoothly with high frame rates, the graphics are stunning, and it looks incredibly polished compared to previous titles. The textures and lighting effects are truly impressive.

M
Minegus_Dub
Member
172
05-11-2016, 09:41 PM
#2
This VRAM consumption is quite substantial for me.
M
Minegus_Dub
05-11-2016, 09:41 PM #2

This VRAM consumption is quite substantial for me.

M
MrCm
Senior Member
636
05-13-2016, 08:32 PM
#3
i know...one more game that cap out my VRAM at 1080p this year... man i'm still playing this and the game is trully beautiful i'm telling you i wasnt expecting that...it's better looking than BF4...by a lot.
M
MrCm
05-13-2016, 08:32 PM #3

i know...one more game that cap out my VRAM at 1080p this year... man i'm still playing this and the game is trully beautiful i'm telling you i wasnt expecting that...it's better looking than BF4...by a lot.

I
ItzManux
Junior Member
15
05-13-2016, 11:59 PM
#4
The other is a different option or choice.
I
ItzManux
05-13-2016, 11:59 PM #4

The other is a different option or choice.

D
dt118lw
Member
198
05-14-2016, 02:27 AM
#5
I successfully achieved full resolution at 1080p without super sampling, but increased settings like 2x SMAA and 2x Filmac SMAA led to texture instability. With only 2GB on a 770 GPU in SLI configuration, it’s a tight setup.
D
dt118lw
05-14-2016, 02:27 AM #5

I successfully achieved full resolution at 1080p without super sampling, but increased settings like 2x SMAA and 2x Filmac SMAA led to texture instability. With only 2GB on a 770 GPU in SLI configuration, it’s a tight setup.

J
jkgaga15
Member
234
05-14-2016, 06:18 AM
#6
Observe the dogs likely.
J
jkgaga15
05-14-2016, 06:18 AM #6

Observe the dogs likely.

C
Cluvie
Junior Member
6
05-14-2016, 09:46 AM
#7
titanfall, watchdogs, shadow of mordor, dead rising 3... I'm glad I didn't get this card... 3GB is way too little.
C
Cluvie
05-14-2016, 09:46 AM #7

titanfall, watchdogs, shadow of mordor, dead rising 3... I'm glad I didn't get this card... 3GB is way too little.

E
Eliazz
Junior Member
36
05-14-2016, 10:36 AM
#8
Observe the current performance of the 2GB; it seems quite problematic these days.
E
Eliazz
05-14-2016, 10:36 AM #8

Observe the current performance of the 2GB; it seems quite problematic these days.

_
_ThePlay
Member
103
05-22-2016, 06:21 AM
#9
It's interesting that just a year ago everyone thought 2GB of VRAM would be enough for smooth 1080p gaming, and the 4GB cards were seen as unnecessary spending...LOL I'd really want my GTX 780 with more memory—definitely worth it. It seems the upgrade will come next year, not because of speed but because of how much VRAM there is. And now it looks like the i7 was a solid choice after all.
_
_ThePlay
05-22-2016, 06:21 AM #9

It's interesting that just a year ago everyone thought 2GB of VRAM would be enough for smooth 1080p gaming, and the 4GB cards were seen as unnecessary spending...LOL I'd really want my GTX 780 with more memory—definitely worth it. It seems the upgrade will come next year, not because of speed but because of how much VRAM there is. And now it looks like the i7 was a solid choice after all.

X
XxGrenidierXx
Posting Freak
813
06-05-2016, 02:51 PM
#10
Yeah, and to think I picked up my 770's this year I guess I should have waited for AMD's cards to come down in price, because I paid 380$ for both of my 2GB cards
X
XxGrenidierXx
06-05-2016, 02:51 PM #10

Yeah, and to think I picked up my 770's this year I guess I should have waited for AMD's cards to come down in price, because I paid 380$ for both of my 2GB cards

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next