Sharing thoughts on launching a Linux channel, especially for connecting with Linus and the community.
Sharing thoughts on launching a Linux channel, especially for connecting with Linus and the community.
They definitely require a real Linux desktop expert. Although there are many others out there, the market is quite competitive. I'm referring to creators like Jupiter Broadcasting, Distrotube, Bryan Lunduke, Gardiner Bryant, Destination Linux, and similar names. If they're looking for someone, I think I could be a fit.
It seems like he hasn't upgraded his tech yet, based on that video.
He definitely relies on Linux in some form, though that’s not the main point I’m aiming for. He also runs macOS and Windows. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that, but it gives the impression the script was written from an outside viewpoint—or might have mistakes because of limited familiarity. I also think it’s safe to say they should bring in someone more experienced in Linux content creation if they want to do it right. Anthony could be a strong co-host, though. It’s very unlikely Linus read this post, and even less likely they’re actually planning to launch a Linux channel.
The videos used a simplified style aimed at a broad audience, mainly those unfamiliar with Linux. It’s unclear if they could offer more detailed content even with their existing team. As someone experienced with Linux for over a decade and a developer, you seem to fit the profile of someone who dislikes NVIDIA for free. The driver functions well for most users, including myself. The Intel driver shares 60% of its code with Windows and is among the top drivers available. This isn’t unique to NVIDIA—browsers generally ignored Linux support, Firefox lacked hw decode acceleration until recently, Chrome still doesn’t, and you often need an external patch for Chromium. The fact that NVIDIA insisted on using a different API instead of VA-API likely isn’t the main issue behind the poor support.
Nvidia's openGL version has significant room for enhancement. Linux relies heavily on it, making driver performance a crucial factor. While the driver functions, it falls short of its potential. I believe the choice to omit hardware decoding for video in web browsers stemmed from older graphics capabilities on Linux (possibly inaccurate).
Mostly because OpenGL isn't the main concern. For compute tasks, you'll probably rely on CUDA or Vulkan-compute, and performance with OpenCL will be poor since coding it is already challenging. For other needs using OpenGL, speed is adequate and extra tools aren't necessary. All my projects run smoothly at 60fps without issues or heavy resource use, so that's not a priority. Also, the absence of robust APIs isn't the only issue—NVIDIA isn't entirely responsible.
I believe the situation is being misrepresented. OpenGL is widely adopted across Linux systems, and relying on NVIDIA drivers can lead to performance problems or bugs. Just because you haven't experienced these issues doesn't mean they don't exist. The overall performance remains below expectations, which is the main concern. I see no reason to dismiss NVIDIA's efforts simply because their software isn't working perfectly for some users. EDIT: I'm not trying to criticize NVIDIA unnecessarily; they have impressive capabilities (CUDA works well and my machine runs smoothly on a 2070). My goal is to see their drivers improve, especially since people are affected by issues like compositor instability or Chrome's frame limits. Addressing these matters sooner benefits everyone.
The Linux community truly stands out compared to other OS groups, especially Windows. Have you checked the MS forums? It doesn’t seem like a great spot when there are much better options in the Linux world—like Ubuntu, which has really helped me. There are those heated debates, but if that’s the case, shouldn’t every gaming and tech channel keep producing content? There’s always competition: companies like AMD, Nvidia, or Intel pushing their agendas, and people arguing about games like Terraria versus Minecraft. That’s just part of the scene.
The negativity, pride, sense of superiority, and exclusivity within the Linux/FOSS community are genuine issues. They tend to intensify with more experience. Little has changed since the early days. When I first learned Linux in 1993, the standard response to any question from someone new was simply "RTFM." It was tough back then, yet I still retain some knowledge I had to discover independently. Joining Linux conversations today, especially with Arch users, feels like traveling back in time—but not in a constructive way. Those who were born into it didn’t have to start from scratch. Your insights matter to others. Don’t hoard them. Sure, repeating the same question can be frustrating, but if you’re not willing to engage, just let someone else handle it. Of course, this attitude isn’t unique to Linux; modern society is increasingly marked by arrogance, entitlement, and a lack of humility, with people assuming expertise when they’re not even knowledgeable. I’m just hoping this trend fades and people become more open-minded and considerate.