F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Server model server2700x vs 9350k for dedicated gaming setup.

Server model server2700x vs 9350k for dedicated gaming setup.

Server model server2700x vs 9350k for dedicated gaming setup.

S
Sebzstar
Junior Member
4
09-15-2018, 11:02 AM
#1
Hello currently looking to upgrade my game server I have here at home. Currently has a i5 4460 with 8gb of ram in it. But i would like to have some more performance out of it. Current games I'm hosting: Arma 3 headless client and two minecraft servers when I'm not hosting Arma. Main advantage with 2700x is the core and thread count. I could host two Arma 3 headless clients at the same time which would be very beneficial. Main advantage of the 9350k would be clock speed which Arma likes. But I don't know if a 9350k running at 5ghz(assuming I can get that oc with my cheap z390 mobo) will out perform the 2700x just simply hosting two hc's instead. There is about a 1.5$ difference in between them currently where I live. For those who don't know a Arma 3 headless clients basically do calculations for the server. So AI calculations ect. They usually provide a massive FPS boost to the server which gives all of the players more FPS since the player FPS is somewhat tied to the server FPS. Side note: Also host a Emby media server but that doesn't really make that big of a difference unless I'm encoding. Also there is a slight possibility that I might use it to render some blender/premiere projects in the future but that's a big fat maybe. Also my first post ever here so if this is in the wrong place or doing something I shouldn't please let me know so I can fix it.
S
Sebzstar
09-15-2018, 11:02 AM #1

Hello currently looking to upgrade my game server I have here at home. Currently has a i5 4460 with 8gb of ram in it. But i would like to have some more performance out of it. Current games I'm hosting: Arma 3 headless client and two minecraft servers when I'm not hosting Arma. Main advantage with 2700x is the core and thread count. I could host two Arma 3 headless clients at the same time which would be very beneficial. Main advantage of the 9350k would be clock speed which Arma likes. But I don't know if a 9350k running at 5ghz(assuming I can get that oc with my cheap z390 mobo) will out perform the 2700x just simply hosting two hc's instead. There is about a 1.5$ difference in between them currently where I live. For those who don't know a Arma 3 headless clients basically do calculations for the server. So AI calculations ect. They usually provide a massive FPS boost to the server which gives all of the players more FPS since the player FPS is somewhat tied to the server FPS. Side note: Also host a Emby media server but that doesn't really make that big of a difference unless I'm encoding. Also there is a slight possibility that I might use it to render some blender/premiere projects in the future but that's a big fat maybe. Also my first post ever here so if this is in the wrong place or doing something I shouldn't please let me know so I can fix it.

X
76
09-15-2018, 11:47 AM
#2
I plan to purchase the 4460 + mobo + ram + budget Z390 motherboard for a potential upgrade to an AM4 platform if I decide to go with the 2700X. What recommendations do you have for a suitable motherboard in that scenario? Right now, the B450 Tomahawk is about $140, which is roughly $7 more than its maximum price. The Asus ROG Strix B450-F Gaming is around $115, offering solid reviews at a reasonable price. Also worth noting: I’m based in Sweden, so all figures are converted from Swedish Kronor to US dollars using a straightforward 10:1 exchange rate. I’m also using prisjakt.nu to compare prices across major retailers simultaneously.
X
xXMLGSwag360Xx
09-15-2018, 11:47 AM #2

I plan to purchase the 4460 + mobo + ram + budget Z390 motherboard for a potential upgrade to an AM4 platform if I decide to go with the 2700X. What recommendations do you have for a suitable motherboard in that scenario? Right now, the B450 Tomahawk is about $140, which is roughly $7 more than its maximum price. The Asus ROG Strix B450-F Gaming is around $115, offering solid reviews at a reasonable price. Also worth noting: I’m based in Sweden, so all figures are converted from Swedish Kronor to US dollars using a straightforward 10:1 exchange rate. I’m also using prisjakt.nu to compare prices across major retailers simultaneously.

K
kenneth270
Junior Member
49
09-15-2018, 04:57 PM
#3
Keep in mind that when you upgrade, you can move to 16 cores if required.
K
kenneth270
09-15-2018, 04:57 PM #3

Keep in mind that when you upgrade, you can move to 16 cores if required.

M
Math0X
Junior Member
4
09-23-2018, 04:56 PM
#4
I didn't consider that idea. AMD would certainly offer a better upgrade route. However, I don't have much money, so it'll take some time before I can upgrade again.
M
Math0X
09-23-2018, 04:56 PM #4

I didn't consider that idea. AMD would certainly offer a better upgrade route. However, I don't have much money, so it'll take some time before I can upgrade again.