Seeking the highest possible speed on WiFi network
Seeking the highest possible speed on WiFi network
He has a solid internet setup with 1 Gigabit Hyperoptic, but he’s looking for higher speeds over Wi-Fi. At around 350MBps you’re already in a decent range, though pushing to 700-800MBps is achievable with the right configuration. Your budget of £200 should cover a Ubiquiti Unifi NanoHD and possibly a few extra devices. For maximum performance, focus on optimizing the router settings—enable QoS, prioritize traffic, and ensure proper channel selection. If you want more throughput, consider upgrading to a higher-bandwidth access point or router within the same price range. Flat network speeds of 900-1000MBps are realistic in an open layout with minimal interference. Let me know if you need help fine-tuning the setup!
Consider 185 UK Pounds: NETGEAR Nighthawk X6S Smart Wi-Fi Router (R8000P) - AC4000 Tri-Band Wireless Speed (up to 4000 Mbps) | Covers up to 3500 sq ft & supports 55 devices | Includes 4 x 1G Ethernet and 2 USB ports https://www.amazon.co.uk/NETGEAR-R8000P-...073G222VP/ Keep in mind you’ll need a compatible wireless card in your computer to reach those speeds. If your card supports only 866 Mbps, performance will be limited—typically around 350-400 Mbps in each direction. The model below can handle up to 1300 Mbps on 5GHz and 600 Mbps on 2.4GHz.
Thanks for your input! I was reviewing the specifications of the R8000P versus the NanoHD. At first, it seemed the R8000P would perform better, but the NanoHD actually offers a higher bandwidth on a single channel (1625 Mbps compared to 1733 Mbps). In practice, the R8000P delivers around 600 Mbps, which is roughly 50-100 Mbps less than what some users report with the NanoHD. I think reliability plays a role here, so I’m still inclined toward the NanoHD. Recently, I saw people achieving about 900 Mbps with the full Unifi HD for around £300. My friend mentioned he’d prefer the HD option for that speed, so I’m considering his perspective. What are your thoughts?
for the clients, the key equipment includes: iPhone XS MAX, Samsung Galaxy S10+, 2018 5k iMac, and Macbook Pro 2017. I anticipate the Macbook and iMac could reach around 900mbps, but I’m curious about the S10+ performance since it only has a dual-core processor. It should also support VHT160 for Wi-Fi 6 compliance, so I’d like to know if using that would allow the S10+ to surpass the iPhone’s speeds.
You might notice a slight improvement in performance with the nanoHD, but remember the Netgear router offers four Ethernet ports that support gigabit speeds and two USB ports. These can be handy for tasks like connecting a printer via the router as a server or attaching an external hard drive and using cloud storage. The router also delivers 600Mbps at 2.4GHz compared to 300Mbps with the nanoHD—though it’s unclear if that difference matters much. Personally, I’m not familiar with the nanoHD, so I can’t confirm if it will give you faster speeds. For me, the router’s features seem more valuable. It makes sense to use the Ethernet ports and a patch cable if you have a nearby desk, plugging it into your laptop for speed. The nanoHD appears to be designed for simple mounting and seems to lack additional connectivity options. Also, it doesn’t seem to require forcing a specific power adapter setup; other routers allow using third-party adapters with standard barrel jacks. It’s just a matter of personal preference—some users might appreciate fewer cables and more straightforward connections.
yeahh i much prefer the fact that their is only one cable to worry about, it makes positioning of the unit much easier, the router itself for him is perfectly fine so we are not worried about that we are simply changing up the wifi so im not really fussed as we already have the gigabit ports in the existing router. in regards to using "their" power adapter, this isnt quite accurate as it is not "their" one, it uses 802.11af which means you can pick up a different injector if you wish to use another one, but the main benefit for using 802.11af over a barrel power jack is the fact it allows you to use a POE switch allowing for all the networking devices to be powered simply off the switch whcih can clean up a setup a lot if you have multiple access points as it means you do not need a different power adapter for each and every one, so actually POE is a very strong feature of the nanoHD.
i also overlooked mentioning that the 2.4ghz option will be treated as a legacy choice in his network. since all his devices support 5ghz networking, and his whole flat will be covered by that speed, the 2.4ghz is only important for older models that lack 5ghz capabilities. those units probably wouldn’t handle more than 300mbps, making it a non-problem.
It seems you're referring to the differences between WiFi 5 and WiFi 6 performance. While WiFi 5 can technically support high speeds, real-world results depend on channel clarity and bandwidth. In crowded areas with many networks, the two technologies often don't work well together.
900 is essentially the upper limit considering overhead, and only certain devices can handle it. 800 is what most people achieve in ideal conditions. Pushing wireless too aggressively is a losing strategy. Satisfy with 800, and if you need an additional 200mbps, switch to wired.