F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Security solution tailored for unique requirements

Security solution tailored for unique requirements

Security solution tailored for unique requirements

S
Spann3r
Member
58
07-22-2024, 06:35 AM
#1
So here it comes again—something about setting up a firewall or router software. I’m after a solution that lets remote users join a VPN so they can reach the resources on my server. It should act like a DIY alternative to Hamachi, but not too complicated. Basically, I want a tool I can drop into a VM on my server that does these things:

- Users connect via Windows built-in VPN (no exceptions—end users are just basic folks).
- All connected users stay isolated; they can’t ping each other or communicate directly.
- The same VM needs a way to forward ports, either by allowing or blocking specific IPs and ports.
- Everything should fit in a single VM with under 1GB RAM.

From what I’ve seen (professionally):
- Things I don’t need: top-tier security for the VPN itself.
- Things I do need: strong public-network compatibility, enterprise-level features, good history.
- What matters to me: simple setup and configuration, easy-to-use interfaces for both setting up rules and managing them.
- I want minimal resource use—ideally just one VM running everything.

What I’ve tried before didn’t work because:
- PFense’s VPN setup is messy, even with strict guides.
- OPNsense has a confusing interface.
- IPFire’s web UI is worse than D-link.
- Linux firewalls are powerful but hard to configure for this use case.

I need something user-friendly, works smoothly on Windows clients, and gives me clear control over port access without getting bogged down in complexity.
S
Spann3r
07-22-2024, 06:35 AM #1

So here it comes again—something about setting up a firewall or router software. I’m after a solution that lets remote users join a VPN so they can reach the resources on my server. It should act like a DIY alternative to Hamachi, but not too complicated. Basically, I want a tool I can drop into a VM on my server that does these things:

- Users connect via Windows built-in VPN (no exceptions—end users are just basic folks).
- All connected users stay isolated; they can’t ping each other or communicate directly.
- The same VM needs a way to forward ports, either by allowing or blocking specific IPs and ports.
- Everything should fit in a single VM with under 1GB RAM.

From what I’ve seen (professionally):
- Things I don’t need: top-tier security for the VPN itself.
- Things I do need: strong public-network compatibility, enterprise-level features, good history.
- What matters to me: simple setup and configuration, easy-to-use interfaces for both setting up rules and managing them.
- I want minimal resource use—ideally just one VM running everything.

What I’ve tried before didn’t work because:
- PFense’s VPN setup is messy, even with strict guides.
- OPNsense has a confusing interface.
- IPFire’s web UI is worse than D-link.
- Linux firewalls are powerful but hard to configure for this use case.

I need something user-friendly, works smoothly on Windows clients, and gives me clear control over port access without getting bogged down in complexity.

P
PvPGranade
Junior Member
5
07-22-2024, 06:35 AM
#2
You'd need to begin at the most basic layer, such as the local area network, and then create a virtual network with a dedicated VPN server for every user. It's a bit tricky but can be approached in these kinds of scenarios.
P
PvPGranade
07-22-2024, 06:35 AM #2

You'd need to begin at the most basic layer, such as the local area network, and then create a virtual network with a dedicated VPN server for every user. It's a bit tricky but can be approached in these kinds of scenarios.

S
shmorgysporg
Member
212
07-22-2024, 06:35 AM
#3
The choice of using a VPN often depends on the specific service being accessed. It's unclear why one might think a VPN simplifies setup compared to port forwarding.
S
shmorgysporg
07-22-2024, 06:35 AM #3

The choice of using a VPN often depends on the specific service being accessed. It's unclear why one might think a VPN simplifies setup compared to port forwarding.

L
lofogamer
Member
55
07-22-2024, 06:35 AM
#4
since i frequently ride my bike through game servers, many lack good password systems or let you stay hidden from the in-game list. it’s worth noting that every hour i invest in setting this up can pay off after just 2–3 changes of passwords or adding a whitelist for any server.
L
lofogamer
07-22-2024, 06:35 AM #4

since i frequently ride my bike through game servers, many lack good password systems or let you stay hidden from the in-game list. it’s worth noting that every hour i invest in setting this up can pay off after just 2–3 changes of passwords or adding a whitelist for any server.

C
cally1900
Member
165
07-22-2024, 06:35 AM
#5
Avoid merely replacing the EdgeRouter Lite or Mikrotik hEX files with a VPN service. Instead, consider using the native Windows OpenVPN Community solution. Installing the client is straightforward and usually simpler than managing a Windows VPN.
C
cally1900
07-22-2024, 06:35 AM #5

Avoid merely replacing the EdgeRouter Lite or Mikrotik hEX files with a VPN service. Instead, consider using the native Windows OpenVPN Community solution. Installing the client is straightforward and usually simpler than managing a Windows VPN.

N
Ninjaaaa_FF
Member
51
07-22-2024, 06:35 AM
#6
unfortunately the Windows VPN setup is essential since some end users refuse to install anything. regarding the router side, my primary router functions as a VPN device, but its implementation has certain constraints that render it unsuitable for this purpose.
N
Ninjaaaa_FF
07-22-2024, 06:35 AM #6

unfortunately the Windows VPN setup is essential since some end users refuse to install anything. regarding the router side, my primary router functions as a VPN device, but its implementation has certain constraints that render it unsuitable for this purpose.