F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Searching for instructions on enhancing the performance of a Ryzen 5 1600 processor

Searching for instructions on enhancing the performance of a Ryzen 5 1600 processor

Searching for instructions on enhancing the performance of a Ryzen 5 1600 processor

K
KasieKat
Member
188
05-24-2017, 02:02 PM
#1
My CPU is a Ryzen 5 1600, my motherboard is an Asrock B450m Pro4f, I have 16GB of 2400MHz RAM, and a 600w power supply. I'm just starting with Ryzen and would appreciate advice on how to overclock my Ryzen 5 1600 for improved performance.
K
KasieKat
05-24-2017, 02:02 PM #1

My CPU is a Ryzen 5 1600, my motherboard is an Asrock B450m Pro4f, I have 16GB of 2400MHz RAM, and a 600w power supply. I'm just starting with Ryzen and would appreciate advice on how to overclock my Ryzen 5 1600 for improved performance.

S
SillyDragon
Senior Member
586
05-25-2017, 04:11 PM
#2
I performed the following steps using Ryzen Master. I gradually increased the frequency, testing with Cinebench at each stage. After each adjustment, I recorded the results. When the system rebooted, it would restart again. Then I slightly raised the voltage in Ryzen Master and repeated the cycle. This process took around 20 trials to identify the optimal balance where the voltage stays below 1.35 (AMD warns this is unsafe for regular use). My initial configuration was 4.0GHz at 1.35V; I tested up to 1.4V but saw no further improvement. Despite higher voltage and proper cooling, I couldn’t achieve more speed. Eventually I began lowering the voltage until...
S
SillyDragon
05-25-2017, 04:11 PM #2

I performed the following steps using Ryzen Master. I gradually increased the frequency, testing with Cinebench at each stage. After each adjustment, I recorded the results. When the system rebooted, it would restart again. Then I slightly raised the voltage in Ryzen Master and repeated the cycle. This process took around 20 trials to identify the optimal balance where the voltage stays below 1.35 (AMD warns this is unsafe for regular use). My initial configuration was 4.0GHz at 1.35V; I tested up to 1.4V but saw no further improvement. Despite higher voltage and proper cooling, I couldn’t achieve more speed. Eventually I began lowering the voltage until...

K
kaleb85
Member
56
05-26-2017, 08:32 PM
#3
I performed a gradual increase in frequency using Ryzen Master, monitoring performance with CineBench. I adjusted the frequency slightly, ran tests, and recorded outcomes. After each reboot, I would adjust the voltage in Ryzen Master and continue the cycle. This process took around 20 trials to identify the optimal balance where further increases caused the voltage to drop below 1.35V, which AMD warns is unsafe for regular use. Initially, my configuration was set at 4.0GHz with 1.35V, but even at 1.4V no additional speed was achieved despite better cooling. Eventually, I reduced the voltage until the system became unstable, reaching a final setting of 1.3375V. At this point, I achieved a 4.0GHz overclock across all cores and threads with a 500Mhz cooler, which performed cooler than the stock cooler operating at its standard speed and voltage.
K
kaleb85
05-26-2017, 08:32 PM #3

I performed a gradual increase in frequency using Ryzen Master, monitoring performance with CineBench. I adjusted the frequency slightly, ran tests, and recorded outcomes. After each reboot, I would adjust the voltage in Ryzen Master and continue the cycle. This process took around 20 trials to identify the optimal balance where further increases caused the voltage to drop below 1.35V, which AMD warns is unsafe for regular use. Initially, my configuration was set at 4.0GHz with 1.35V, but even at 1.4V no additional speed was achieved despite better cooling. Eventually, I reduced the voltage until the system became unstable, reaching a final setting of 1.3375V. At this point, I achieved a 4.0GHz overclock across all cores and threads with a 500Mhz cooler, which performed cooler than the stock cooler operating at its standard speed and voltage.

A
augustb19907
Senior Member
456
06-02-2017, 01:41 PM
#4
Thank you, you provided a lot of useful information. I'll attempt to use Ryzen Master.
A
augustb19907
06-02-2017, 01:41 PM #4

Thank you, you provided a lot of useful information. I'll attempt to use Ryzen Master.

W
Wero_NIKI
Member
181
06-02-2017, 01:54 PM
#5
Care to provide a reference for that? because the last time I saw an overclocking guide for Zen 1000 CPU's published by AMD, I recall it saying 1.425V max for daily use, 1.45 as an extreme max for safety. Most people would look for 1.375 range...1.35-1.40.
Even then, it depends a lot on how heavy loaded your processor is. The board I use for my 1700, for instance, has terrible vdroop so at light loads it has to be around 1.425 so it can droop to 1.37 or so under heavy load (rendering a video with HandBrake) and remain stable. Below the processor's voltage stress limit level (which has to be something north of 1.5 V even for 3rd gen Ryzen, 7 nm) processor life is degraded when voltage is high while current is also high, i.e., power and heat output is high, as when processing a heavy load.
Here's Robert Halleck (AMD's tech sales guru)
explaining how he overclocks 1st gen
; skip ahead to about 18:15 where he says start out at 1.4 and how he had to end up with his home system at 1.4V for stability.
W
Wero_NIKI
06-02-2017, 01:54 PM #5

Care to provide a reference for that? because the last time I saw an overclocking guide for Zen 1000 CPU's published by AMD, I recall it saying 1.425V max for daily use, 1.45 as an extreme max for safety. Most people would look for 1.375 range...1.35-1.40.
Even then, it depends a lot on how heavy loaded your processor is. The board I use for my 1700, for instance, has terrible vdroop so at light loads it has to be around 1.425 so it can droop to 1.37 or so under heavy load (rendering a video with HandBrake) and remain stable. Below the processor's voltage stress limit level (which has to be something north of 1.5 V even for 3rd gen Ryzen, 7 nm) processor life is degraded when voltage is high while current is also high, i.e., power and heat output is high, as when processing a heavy load.
Here's Robert Halleck (AMD's tech sales guru)
explaining how he overclocks 1st gen
; skip ahead to about 18:15 where he says start out at 1.4 and how he had to end up with his home system at 1.4V for stability.

R
Rylox44
Member
53
06-03-2017, 04:59 PM
#6
the references I saw, videos and overclocking guides, said 1.4 is nearing the danger zone and every reference I saw said 1.35 is well in the safe area. as I said I tried voltages over 1.4 for my system and nothing would make it run any faster so I went with the fastest clock at the lowest voltage possible.
if you read my posts you will notice I am a bit cowardly in my estimations (wiggle room is so nice - no two chips are the exact same), I would rather be conservative and have things work than push the limit and get sued for 5 fried CPU's by people following my advice to the letter.
in any case we agree that 1.35 is well in the safe zone and as I said "here's what I did"
R
Rylox44
06-03-2017, 04:59 PM #6

the references I saw, videos and overclocking guides, said 1.4 is nearing the danger zone and every reference I saw said 1.35 is well in the safe area. as I said I tried voltages over 1.4 for my system and nothing would make it run any faster so I went with the fastest clock at the lowest voltage possible.
if you read my posts you will notice I am a bit cowardly in my estimations (wiggle room is so nice - no two chips are the exact same), I would rather be conservative and have things work than push the limit and get sued for 5 fried CPU's by people following my advice to the letter.
in any case we agree that 1.35 is well in the safe zone and as I said "here's what I did"

J
JJAwesome8078
Member
156
06-03-2017, 09:01 PM
#7
Well, that's one of the issues I think about. Most of us read those guides and they just repeat the same misconceptions.
The core point is that AMD hasn't released an official manual. We gather fragments here and there—like the video by Robert Halleck—but that's all we have.
Then some individuals claim something as certainty because they believe they found it in a data file, though they don’t fully understand what it means, leading them to guess.
Others with high-end gear and a carefully selected CPU say something simply because they could achieve it, and it’s accepted as truth; this creates the idea that you can't go beyond a certain voltage just because their configuration didn’t require it. If you’re able, that’s fine, but it doesn’t mean it’s the only safe approach.
J
JJAwesome8078
06-03-2017, 09:01 PM #7

Well, that's one of the issues I think about. Most of us read those guides and they just repeat the same misconceptions.
The core point is that AMD hasn't released an official manual. We gather fragments here and there—like the video by Robert Halleck—but that's all we have.
Then some individuals claim something as certainty because they believe they found it in a data file, though they don’t fully understand what it means, leading them to guess.
Others with high-end gear and a carefully selected CPU say something simply because they could achieve it, and it’s accepted as truth; this creates the idea that you can't go beyond a certain voltage just because their configuration didn’t require it. If you’re able, that’s fine, but it doesn’t mean it’s the only safe approach.

O
ovcoming
Member
229
06-05-2017, 01:52 PM
#8
I tried Ryzen Master and tested it with my Ryzen 5 1600. I found a stable setting around 3.9ghz - 1.3475v. Thanks for all the helpful information; I've gained a lot of knowledge.
O
ovcoming
06-05-2017, 01:52 PM #8

I tried Ryzen Master and tested it with my Ryzen 5 1600. I found a stable setting around 3.9ghz - 1.3475v. Thanks for all the helpful information; I've gained a lot of knowledge.