F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Searching for a modern operating system compatible with DOS.

Searching for a modern operating system compatible with DOS.

Searching for a modern operating system compatible with DOS.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3
I
imTri
Posting Freak
786
11-16-2016, 01:15 AM
#21
Norton Commander was primarily a file manager, not a typical desktop application.
I
imTri
11-16-2016, 01:15 AM #21

Norton Commander was primarily a file manager, not a typical desktop application.

G
gepe12
Junior Member
13
11-22-2016, 01:38 PM
#22
Searching Barnacules Nerdgasm life story. It's a lengthy piece, but it seems to cover the kind of modified DOS programs that mimic multitasking.
G
gepe12
11-22-2016, 01:38 PM #22

Searching Barnacules Nerdgasm life story. It's a lengthy piece, but it seems to cover the kind of modified DOS programs that mimic multitasking.

N
Nerazzurri
Junior Member
44
11-28-2016, 02:44 PM
#23
I've already set up DOS 7.1 and added the games, but the DOS Shell seems to be the only one that works.
N
Nerazzurri
11-28-2016, 02:44 PM #23

I've already set up DOS 7.1 and added the games, but the DOS Shell seems to be the only one that works.

C
CoolCharmander
Junior Member
12
11-28-2016, 03:11 PM
#24
Windows compatibility up to the millennium release and enterprise versions until 3.11 (my understanding)
C
CoolCharmander
11-28-2016, 03:11 PM #24

Windows compatibility up to the millennium release and enterprise versions until 3.11 (my understanding)

S
StyleTrick
Senior Member
744
12-04-2016, 10:47 AM
#25
I've tested all the options from Windows 3.1 through 98. I ran Windows 98 from a boot disk and it worked fine. FreeDOS didn't work on DOS 7.1 due to a workaround I used, and it failed on Windows 3.0. FreeDOS also didn't boot from a DOS boot disk, while Windows 3.1 handled it smoothly. On FreeDOS, MS-DOS 7.1 got stuck in the boot menu and didn't load properly. Windows 95 froze on its boot disk, showing a loading bar and prompting system configuration. The only stable results were Windows 98 and Windows 2000, which I found easier to install. I haven't tried Windows NT (3.5-4.0) because it wasn't designed for DOS environments, and I didn't have the ISO then. I also avoided Windows ME since it wasn't available at the time. Everything above Windows 2000 and below Windows 8 seemed problematic, so I think it's best to move on.
S
StyleTrick
12-04-2016, 10:47 AM #25

I've tested all the options from Windows 3.1 through 98. I ran Windows 98 from a boot disk and it worked fine. FreeDOS didn't work on DOS 7.1 due to a workaround I used, and it failed on Windows 3.0. FreeDOS also didn't boot from a DOS boot disk, while Windows 3.1 handled it smoothly. On FreeDOS, MS-DOS 7.1 got stuck in the boot menu and didn't load properly. Windows 95 froze on its boot disk, showing a loading bar and prompting system configuration. The only stable results were Windows 98 and Windows 2000, which I found easier to install. I haven't tried Windows NT (3.5-4.0) because it wasn't designed for DOS environments, and I didn't have the ISO then. I also avoided Windows ME since it wasn't available at the time. Everything above Windows 2000 and below Windows 8 seemed problematic, so I think it's best to move on.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3