F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Search for a reliable OC option.

Search for a reliable OC option.

Search for a reliable OC option.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
J
jonas1708
Member
Find
70
08-24-2025, 05:29 PM
#11
I will attempt this but I wondered why I included the numbers 15 and 16—I believed smaller values are preferable for timing.
Reply
Reply
J
jonas1708
08-24-2025, 05:29 PM #11

I will attempt this but I wondered why I included the numbers 15 and 16—I believed smaller values are preferable for timing.

Reply
Reply
N
NastyBastrd
Member
Find
186
08-24-2025, 07:37 PM
#12
XMP boosted your frame rate, but higher settings caused blue screen issues. XMP seems problematic? Alright, keep it on for better performance. By the way, your RAM wasn’t at 2800 MHz—unstable isn’t acceptable.
Reply
Reply
N
NastyBastrd
08-24-2025, 07:37 PM #12

XMP boosted your frame rate, but higher settings caused blue screen issues. XMP seems problematic? Alright, keep it on for better performance. By the way, your RAM wasn’t at 2800 MHz—unstable isn’t acceptable.

Reply
Reply
F
Faustlacher
Member
Find
52
08-26-2025, 08:21 AM
#13
At 1.400v what settings are recommended? CL 19 or 18? It seems better to use Cas 16 at a lower frequency and then increase it. Posting 2133 at CL 16-16-16 might work—try 1.3750v. They’ll need the voltage to reach their target.
Reply
Reply
F
Faustlacher
08-26-2025, 08:21 AM #13

At 1.400v what settings are recommended? CL 19 or 18? It seems better to use Cas 16 at a lower frequency and then increase it. Posting 2133 at CL 16-16-16 might work—try 1.3750v. They’ll need the voltage to reach their target.

Reply
Reply
V
ViralControl
Member
Find
187
09-03-2025, 08:17 AM
#14
His XMP matches Jedec's.
Reply
Reply
V
ViralControl
09-03-2025, 08:17 AM #14

His XMP matches Jedec's.

Reply
Reply
F
Flashice
Member
Find
172
09-03-2025, 04:57 PM
#15
At 2800 i saw a big jump from 70 to 90 fps.
Reply
Reply
F
Flashice
09-03-2025, 04:57 PM #15

At 2800 i saw a big jump from 70 to 90 fps.

Reply
Reply
K
KraZDave
Junior Member
Find
5
09-03-2025, 06:39 PM
#16
XMP is operating at 2400, not 2133, which explains the fps improvement. That’s what I interpreted from his comment.
Reply
Reply
K
KraZDave
09-03-2025, 06:39 PM #16

XMP is operating at 2400, not 2133, which explains the fps improvement. That’s what I interpreted from his comment.

Reply
Reply
M
maximumpats
Junior Member
Find
46
09-04-2025, 12:30 AM
#17
It's not feasible, perhaps. Another element might have influenced the result, likely an inaccurate FPS measurement.
Reply
Reply
M
maximumpats
09-04-2025, 12:30 AM #17

It's not feasible, perhaps. Another element might have influenced the result, likely an inaccurate FPS measurement.

Reply
Reply
F
Foxing_Box
Member
Find
80
09-25-2025, 10:20 PM
#18
It seems I'm not sure about my task, but thank you for your effort in helping!
Reply
Reply
F
Foxing_Box
09-25-2025, 10:20 PM #18

It seems I'm not sure about my task, but thank you for your effort in helping!

Reply
Reply
J
JR_GAMER07
Posting Freak
Find
915
09-25-2025, 10:37 PM
#19
It seems the spec doesn't mention 2400mhz. Likely he adjusted it himself.
Reply
Reply
J
JR_GAMER07
09-25-2025, 10:37 PM #19

It seems the spec doesn't mention 2400mhz. Likely he adjusted it himself.

Reply
Reply
D
Doudet42
Junior Member
Find
21
09-26-2025, 12:38 AM
#20
You seem confused about the process or maybe didn't grasp how overclocking functions. I helped you see that at 2800 the FPS increased a lot compared to stock, but the numbers didn’t change much when using the XMP profile 2400 15 15 15 35.
Reply
Reply
D
Doudet42
09-26-2025, 12:38 AM #20

You seem confused about the process or maybe didn't grasp how overclocking functions. I helped you see that at 2800 the FPS increased a lot compared to stock, but the numbers didn’t change much when using the XMP profile 2400 15 15 15 35.

Reply
Reply
Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next