F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Scores for the Ryzen 3100 Geekbench 5 are becoming visible.

Scores for the Ryzen 3100 Geekbench 5 are becoming visible.

Scores for the Ryzen 3100 Geekbench 5 are becoming visible.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
N
nameehasan
Member
231
06-06-2019, 05:24 AM
#1
Looking for updates on the Ryzen 3100 CPU? Geekbench 5 provides several rankings. On B450 you can view scores here: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/1876148 Detailed breakdown: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/1876148.gb5 On X570: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/1887281 Detailed breakdown: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/1887281.gb5 I’m not certain board differences matter, but I thought it’d be worth noting. For future searches, try "3100" on Geekbench 5: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/sea...8=✓&q=3100 And for "3300X" in Beekbench 5: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/sea...=✓&q=3300x
N
nameehasan
06-06-2019, 05:24 AM #1

Looking for updates on the Ryzen 3100 CPU? Geekbench 5 provides several rankings. On B450 you can view scores here: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/1876148 Detailed breakdown: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/1876148.gb5 On X570: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/1887281 Detailed breakdown: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/1887281.gb5 I’m not certain board differences matter, but I thought it’d be worth noting. For future searches, try "3100" on Geekbench 5: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/sea...8=✓&q=3100 And for "3300X" in Beekbench 5: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/sea...=✓&q=3300x

S
sdl007
Junior Member
23
06-14-2019, 05:06 AM
#2
it displays reported base frequency, not actual frequency measurements
S
sdl007
06-14-2019, 05:06 AM #2

it displays reported base frequency, not actual frequency measurements

P
PugCookie
Junior Member
22
06-14-2019, 05:50 AM
#3
The 3100’s foundation equals 3.6.
P
PugCookie
06-14-2019, 05:50 AM #3

The 3100’s foundation equals 3.6.

N
navibam
Junior Member
36
06-17-2019, 10:06 AM
#4
This can be challenging to explain since it varies based on the CPU's operation. Comparing PBO with a static multiplier, these findings suggest it's displaying base and boost speeds consistently across all three tests.
N
navibam
06-17-2019, 10:06 AM #4

This can be challenging to explain since it varies based on the CPU's operation. Comparing PBO with a static multiplier, these findings suggest it's displaying base and boost speeds consistently across all three tests.

V
186
06-17-2019, 12:28 PM
#5
It's tough to establish a reference since I was checking 7700ks to compare them, but I'm unsure if those units are genuine or a different model unless my perspective is off.
V
victorfamosaya
06-17-2019, 12:28 PM #5

It's tough to establish a reference since I was checking 7700ks to compare them, but I'm unsure if those units are genuine or a different model unless my perspective is off.

U
UghItzEliza
Junior Member
21
06-17-2019, 08:29 PM
#6
The Ryzen 5 2600 and 3600 are quite similar in performance. A quick graph would highlight their close proximity to other CPUs in the range.
U
UghItzEliza
06-17-2019, 08:29 PM #6

The Ryzen 5 2600 and 3600 are quite similar in performance. A quick graph would highlight their close proximity to other CPUs in the range.

S
SuperRxns
Member
102
06-19-2019, 08:16 PM
#7
The URL will display additional information when you add the Geekbench 5 identifier. Type it at the end to view more details.
S
SuperRxns
06-19-2019, 08:16 PM #7

The URL will display additional information when you add the Geekbench 5 identifier. Type it at the end to view more details.

K
kootertjeswek
Junior Member
24
07-02-2019, 06:47 AM
#8
It seems to highlight the highest frequency values. One of the 7700ks reached 5.3ghz, which is quite rare. Comparing the 8700ks, the reported max frequency varies widely. I suspect the frequency data might not be reliable.
K
kootertjeswek
07-02-2019, 06:47 AM #8

It seems to highlight the highest frequency values. One of the 7700ks reached 5.3ghz, which is quite rare. Comparing the 8700ks, the reported max frequency varies widely. I suspect the frequency data might not be reliable.

B
BullyMaster
Junior Member
18
07-02-2019, 08:42 AM
#9
That looks great. I'm curious if 3300x will fit with the R5 2600 in multi settings—it would be amazing for budget builds.
B
BullyMaster
07-02-2019, 08:42 AM #9

That looks great. I'm curious if 3300x will fit with the R5 2600 in multi settings—it would be amazing for budget builds.

T
TeTuveEnElAire
Junior Member
17
07-16-2019, 09:36 AM
#10
Questioning whether the R3 3300X will perform comparably to the R5 2600 in a multicore setup. If single-core results are used and multiplied by core count, the numbers don’t match precisely. The key point is that achieving a similar multi-core score for the R5 2600 would require its single-core rating to be around 1300. The 3600X and 3800X fall short with their respective single-core values, suggesting the 3300X likely won’t reach a comparable multi-core performance.
T
TeTuveEnElAire
07-16-2019, 09:36 AM #10

Questioning whether the R3 3300X will perform comparably to the R5 2600 in a multicore setup. If single-core results are used and multiplied by core count, the numbers don’t match precisely. The key point is that achieving a similar multi-core score for the R5 2600 would require its single-core rating to be around 1300. The 3600X and 3800X fall short with their respective single-core values, suggesting the 3300X likely won’t reach a comparable multi-core performance.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next