F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Same SK Hynix C-die for HyperX?

Same SK Hynix C-die for HyperX?

Same SK Hynix C-die for HyperX?

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
C
Cra123
Senior Member
251
01-13-2017, 02:02 AM
#11
It's not that significant, even when pushing it to CL12 it only highlights improvements in a limited number of tasks.
C
Cra123
01-13-2017, 02:02 AM #11

It's not that significant, even when pushing it to CL12 it only highlights improvements in a limited number of tasks.

S
93
01-20-2017, 05:28 PM
#12
You might try running tests on the board, such as using a 2800MHz CL20-22-22-64, to check if it can boot. If it fails, it’s probably safe to attribute the issue to the board itself.
S
superhero_andy
01-20-2017, 05:28 PM #12

You might try running tests on the board, such as using a 2800MHz CL20-22-22-64, to check if it can boot. If it fails, it’s probably safe to attribute the issue to the board itself.

N
ninja_bob369
Junior Member
11
01-26-2017, 01:48 PM
#13
Updated 19-07-2020: I’m pleased to share that these RAM modules achieved a steady 2666MHz CL13. The 3000MHz CL15 target was abandoned because of platform constraints; CL13 should have been a bit quicker in theory, possibly reaching 2933MHz with an i7. HyperX specifications: (same SK Hynix C-die?) DDR4-2666MHz CL13-15-35 @1.35V (9.7ns) | XMP profile from https://www.kingston.com/dataSheets/HX42...3K2_16.pdf *DDR4-2666MHz CL16-18-18-39 @1.2V (12ns) DDR4-3000MHz CL15-17-17-36 @1.35V (10ns) DDR4-3200MHz CL16-18-18-36 @1.35V (10ns)*
N
ninja_bob369
01-26-2017, 01:48 PM #13

Updated 19-07-2020: I’m pleased to share that these RAM modules achieved a steady 2666MHz CL13. The 3000MHz CL15 target was abandoned because of platform constraints; CL13 should have been a bit quicker in theory, possibly reaching 2933MHz with an i7. HyperX specifications: (same SK Hynix C-die?) DDR4-2666MHz CL13-15-35 @1.35V (9.7ns) | XMP profile from https://www.kingston.com/dataSheets/HX42...3K2_16.pdf *DDR4-2666MHz CL16-18-18-39 @1.2V (12ns) DDR4-3000MHz CL15-17-17-36 @1.35V (10ns) DDR4-3200MHz CL16-18-18-36 @1.35V (10ns)*

H
Hey_Itz_Melani
Junior Member
43
01-30-2017, 11:20 AM
#14
The other board handled up to 3000MHz fine, even beyond that it kept working, but the 3200MHz model from G.Skill had similar problems. That 3000MHz rating is solid!
H
Hey_Itz_Melani
01-30-2017, 11:20 AM #14

The other board handled up to 3000MHz fine, even beyond that it kept working, but the 3200MHz model from G.Skill had similar problems. That 3000MHz rating is solid!

L
Lowdes
Member
214
02-05-2017, 12:48 PM
#15
They were correct about swapping those settings. Now I can confirm the sticks successfully received the 2666MHz kit and reached... DDR4-3600MHz CL17-21-21-39 1.35v
L
Lowdes
02-05-2017, 12:48 PM #15

They were correct about swapping those settings. Now I can confirm the sticks successfully received the 2666MHz kit and reached... DDR4-3600MHz CL17-21-21-39 1.35v

Pages (2): Previous 1 2