F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Safe long term overclock 6700k

Safe long term overclock 6700k

Safe long term overclock 6700k

M
MR_Snorlax231
Member
64
05-06-2016, 05:48 AM
#1
Hi everyone, I recently set up my second rig about three months ago, which is a 6700k build. I achieved stable performance at 4.9 GHz with a 1.385 vcore and max temperatures around 71°C using an H100i. I'm using an Asus Maximus VIII Hero and I was wondering if running this OC long-term would be safe.
M
MR_Snorlax231
05-06-2016, 05:48 AM #1

Hi everyone, I recently set up my second rig about three months ago, which is a 6700k build. I achieved stable performance at 4.9 GHz with a 1.385 vcore and max temperatures around 71°C using an H100i. I'm using an Asus Maximus VIII Hero and I was wondering if running this OC long-term would be safe.

M
83
05-07-2016, 07:36 PM
#2
It should remain secure either way, unless your CPU is struggling, 4.6 remains a solid overclock if you're comfortable with a lower voltage core. Most CPUs perform well as long as the temperatures stay manageable and the voltage isn't excessively high (above 1.4v for Skylake). No assurances can be given about any overclock.
M
MrCreeperBoss7
05-07-2016, 07:36 PM #2

It should remain secure either way, unless your CPU is struggling, 4.6 remains a solid overclock if you're comfortable with a lower voltage core. Most CPUs perform well as long as the temperatures stay manageable and the voltage isn't excessively high (above 1.4v for Skylake). No assurances can be given about any overclock.

V
VebbiHD
Member
209
05-09-2016, 04:50 PM
#3
It's tough to judge with certainty about overclocking, especially when the CPU has been running for less than a year. There are no guarantees, but it seems to be working well. Temperatures look normal and your vcore is within the usual recommended range of 1.4v. It looks like a successful overclock.
V
VebbiHD
05-09-2016, 04:50 PM #3

It's tough to judge with certainty about overclocking, especially when the CPU has been running for less than a year. There are no guarantees, but it seems to be working well. Temperatures look normal and your vcore is within the usual recommended range of 1.4v. It looks like a successful overclock.

H
hitclub9
Junior Member
18
05-11-2016, 01:51 AM
#4
It's tough to judge with certainty about overclocking, but the CPU seems to have been running well under a year ago with no issues. Temperatures look normal and the voltage core is within the usual safe range. It seems like a good overclock. Thanks for the prompt response! I might try running it at 4.6 GHz since I'm already stable at 1.28 Vcore. You're welcome, and I hope you can keep the system for a while to finish your studies.
H
hitclub9
05-11-2016, 01:51 AM #4

It's tough to judge with certainty about overclocking, but the CPU seems to have been running well under a year ago with no issues. Temperatures look normal and the voltage core is within the usual safe range. It seems like a good overclock. Thanks for the prompt response! I might try running it at 4.6 GHz since I'm already stable at 1.28 Vcore. You're welcome, and I hope you can keep the system for a while to finish your studies.

J
jrleopold
Junior Member
42
05-11-2016, 09:16 AM
#5
It should remain safe either way, unless your CPU is struggling, 4.6 still offers a solid overclock if you're comfortable with a lower base voltage. As long as temperatures stay manageable and the voltage isn't too high (above 1.4v on Skylake), these settings usually perform well after years of use. Making such claims doesn’t guarantee success.

Some enthusiasts go further, aiming for 1.56v or more, which is quite extreme for continuous use. They push hard to beat benchmarks, and if they need a new CPU at the end, it’s probably worth considering. You could experiment with around 1.35v to see how it performs.

You’ll start to feel the strain when the voltage needed to keep the CPU steady during stress tests rises significantly. For example, stable at 4.6 with 1.28 might shift to 4.7 at 1.285 or 1.29, then jump to 4.8 at 1.32v, 4.9 at 1.385. Rather than just increasing the voltage slightly, when it starts needing .03 or .05 more, you’ll realize you’re nearing the limit. This is where returns diminish and extra voltage doesn’t justify the gains.

This is just my perspective—there’s no universal formula for overclocking. Just like 'stable' varies, it depends on what benchmarks matter to you. My experience was that I could reach 4.7ghz but needed a lower voltage (around .045v) and sacrificed about 100mhz to hit 4.6ghz. It was a trade-off I wasn’t comfortable making for bigger speedups.
J
jrleopold
05-11-2016, 09:16 AM #5

It should remain safe either way, unless your CPU is struggling, 4.6 still offers a solid overclock if you're comfortable with a lower base voltage. As long as temperatures stay manageable and the voltage isn't too high (above 1.4v on Skylake), these settings usually perform well after years of use. Making such claims doesn’t guarantee success.

Some enthusiasts go further, aiming for 1.56v or more, which is quite extreme for continuous use. They push hard to beat benchmarks, and if they need a new CPU at the end, it’s probably worth considering. You could experiment with around 1.35v to see how it performs.

You’ll start to feel the strain when the voltage needed to keep the CPU steady during stress tests rises significantly. For example, stable at 4.6 with 1.28 might shift to 4.7 at 1.285 or 1.29, then jump to 4.8 at 1.32v, 4.9 at 1.385. Rather than just increasing the voltage slightly, when it starts needing .03 or .05 more, you’ll realize you’re nearing the limit. This is where returns diminish and extra voltage doesn’t justify the gains.

This is just my perspective—there’s no universal formula for overclocking. Just like 'stable' varies, it depends on what benchmarks matter to you. My experience was that I could reach 4.7ghz but needed a lower voltage (around .045v) and sacrificed about 100mhz to hit 4.6ghz. It was a trade-off I wasn’t comfortable making for bigger speedups.

A
Agrius545
Member
67
05-11-2016, 09:24 AM
#6
Gamer134 asked about running an OC at long term stability, mentioning their 6700k build with stable performance and high temperatures.
A
Agrius545
05-11-2016, 09:24 AM #6

Gamer134 asked about running an OC at long term stability, mentioning their 6700k build with stable performance and high temperatures.