F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming s around Battlefield 1 are growing.

s around Battlefield 1 are growing.

s around Battlefield 1 are growing.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
G
GeruchsBrotal
Junior Member
8
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM
#1
Just a little note this is coming from someone who has never played a Battlefield game before and who likes mid speed tactical games like World of Tanks. So I'm really excited and also concerned over the new Battlefield 1 game that's coming out and I'm concerned it's going to be one of those tiny maped overly sped up games like Call of Duty. I love World War 1 and World War 2 games and I like games to have some sort of realism in them and games like Call of Duty really make me not like play FPS games because there is no realism it's played like your sonic the headgehog with a lazer rifle that looks like a regular rifle. What would make Battlefield 1 a great game for me is if they added things like bullet ballistics in so you would have to actually elevate the barrel of your rifle at extreme ranges and also make you have to lead the target when your shooting at medium to long range to hit a moving target, and even if they don't add the bullet drop at long ranges at least add the thing where you would have to lead a target at medium to long range to hit the target. Also the number one thing that would make Battlefield 1 my favorite game is if they actually made actually giving a extra 5 seconds to think on what your going to do while your in cover actually benefit you in getting the advantage over the enemy and not be another one of those run and gun games. Now I can deal with some sort of non historical accuracy and some non accuracy to real life like I can accept if it wasn't so realistic with the bullet physics and if it was sped up a little bit to be a bit faster then the extremely slow World War 1battles and also I can accept that they made stuff like the tanks a bit faster then they were in history to keep the game play going. I just don;t know if they are going to make it so fast paced there would be no room for tactics and knowledgeable players who like to think about what they do in a game and how it affects the outcome by working with their team. I have seen some gameplay in some weekly tech news live streams and one thing I can say is they nailed the speed of the tanks to the point where they are fast enough to keep the gameplay moving and also keep the tanks slow enough to keep it feeling like they are slow lumbering hunks of metal like they were in World War 1. Also from the game play I have seen the game is one of those faster paced ones and I don't know if the game is only going to be fast paced or if it's going to be one of those games that the pace of the game can change based on where you are on the map and where everyone is on the map. So I hope the makers of Battlefield 1 really strike a good balance of keeping with the WW1 theme, game play speed, and tactical game play because if they make it too fast paced and too run and gunny the game isn't going to be too enjoyable for me.
G
GeruchsBrotal
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM #1

Just a little note this is coming from someone who has never played a Battlefield game before and who likes mid speed tactical games like World of Tanks. So I'm really excited and also concerned over the new Battlefield 1 game that's coming out and I'm concerned it's going to be one of those tiny maped overly sped up games like Call of Duty. I love World War 1 and World War 2 games and I like games to have some sort of realism in them and games like Call of Duty really make me not like play FPS games because there is no realism it's played like your sonic the headgehog with a lazer rifle that looks like a regular rifle. What would make Battlefield 1 a great game for me is if they added things like bullet ballistics in so you would have to actually elevate the barrel of your rifle at extreme ranges and also make you have to lead the target when your shooting at medium to long range to hit a moving target, and even if they don't add the bullet drop at long ranges at least add the thing where you would have to lead a target at medium to long range to hit the target. Also the number one thing that would make Battlefield 1 my favorite game is if they actually made actually giving a extra 5 seconds to think on what your going to do while your in cover actually benefit you in getting the advantage over the enemy and not be another one of those run and gun games. Now I can deal with some sort of non historical accuracy and some non accuracy to real life like I can accept if it wasn't so realistic with the bullet physics and if it was sped up a little bit to be a bit faster then the extremely slow World War 1battles and also I can accept that they made stuff like the tanks a bit faster then they were in history to keep the game play going. I just don;t know if they are going to make it so fast paced there would be no room for tactics and knowledgeable players who like to think about what they do in a game and how it affects the outcome by working with their team. I have seen some gameplay in some weekly tech news live streams and one thing I can say is they nailed the speed of the tanks to the point where they are fast enough to keep the gameplay moving and also keep the tanks slow enough to keep it feeling like they are slow lumbering hunks of metal like they were in World War 1. Also from the game play I have seen the game is one of those faster paced ones and I don't know if the game is only going to be fast paced or if it's going to be one of those games that the pace of the game can change based on where you are on the map and where everyone is on the map. So I hope the makers of Battlefield 1 really strike a good balance of keeping with the WW1 theme, game play speed, and tactical game play because if they make it too fast paced and too run and gunny the game isn't going to be too enjoyable for me.

L
littledud22
Junior Member
48
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM
#2
Battlefield consistently incorporates physics into all projectiles. Bullets, tank shells, and similar items behave realistically. Gameplay isn't always extremely quick, and the environments span vast scales (64-player maps on expansive terrain.)
L
littledud22
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM #2

Battlefield consistently incorporates physics into all projectiles. Bullets, tank shells, and similar items behave realistically. Gameplay isn't always extremely quick, and the environments span vast scales (64-player maps on expansive terrain.)

V
Valkxz
Member
212
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM
#3
I was worried they might be copying COD. I mentioned I haven’t played a battlefield game before and I’m a bit hesitant about jumping into first-person shooters. It’s good to hear they have realistic projectile physics and the large maps feel inviting for someone who enjoys expansive spaces that encourage strategic thinking about positioning and impact.
V
Valkxz
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM #3

I was worried they might be copying COD. I mentioned I haven’t played a battlefield game before and I’m a bit hesitant about jumping into first-person shooters. It’s good to hear they have realistic projectile physics and the large maps feel inviting for someone who enjoys expansive spaces that encourage strategic thinking about positioning and impact.

S
SkyInsane
Senior Member
718
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM
#4
It's a highly collaborative experience with various formats. The game features modes such as TDM that take place on compact maps and are quick, yet its widespread appeal stems from the intense large-scale confrontations. Enjoying is about coordinating with teammates, securing goals, and targeting key locations on the terrain.
S
SkyInsane
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM #4

It's a highly collaborative experience with various formats. The game features modes such as TDM that take place on compact maps and are quick, yet its widespread appeal stems from the intense large-scale confrontations. Enjoying is about coordinating with teammates, securing goals, and targeting key locations on the terrain.

I
imr_ali_craft
Junior Member
29
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM
#5
Battlefield focuses on recreating disorder, where everything happens simultaneously without any control (a chaotic experience).
I
imr_ali_craft
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM #5

Battlefield focuses on recreating disorder, where everything happens simultaneously without any control (a chaotic experience).

B
Bambook
Member
165
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM
#6
It might be RedOrchestra 2 that suits your needs.
B
Bambook
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM #6

It might be RedOrchestra 2 that suits your needs.

R
rosie2435
Senior Member
475
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM
#7
It seems like you're reflecting on how the game might feel compared to past Battlefield titles. You mentioned appreciating a bit of realism, noting that older COD games like Black Ops 1 and 2, as well as MW3, handled the subject well. You also shared that you enjoyed BO3 when you rented it.
R
rosie2435
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM #7

It seems like you're reflecting on how the game might feel compared to past Battlefield titles. You mentioned appreciating a bit of realism, noting that older COD games like Black Ops 1 and 2, as well as MW3, handled the subject well. You also shared that you enjoyed BO3 when you rented it.

N
Niqqur
Member
51
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM
#8
Thanks for letting me know about the battlefield series. Now I realize I’m choosing a game that challenges thinking rather than just buying a copy of COD.
N
Niqqur
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM #8

Thanks for letting me know about the battlefield series. Now I realize I’m choosing a game that challenges thinking rather than just buying a copy of COD.

R
rom77d
Junior Member
2
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM
#9
But I'd wait to see what others think. Although the game offers realistic elements, it's not fully realistic. It includes strategic aspects if that's what you want. I enjoy these kinds of games.
R
rom77d
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM #9

But I'd wait to see what others think. Although the game offers realistic elements, it's not fully realistic. It includes strategic aspects if that's what you want. I enjoy these kinds of games.

W
wcrcm
Junior Member
9
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM
#10
I’m interested in getting RedOrchestra 2 too. It seems to match the real-time combat style I was looking for. I just wanted to ask more about Battlefield 1 since it’s a new title and I was curious about its features.
W
wcrcm
09-05-2020, 09:34 AM #10

I’m interested in getting RedOrchestra 2 too. It seems to match the real-time combat style I was looking for. I just wanted to ask more about Battlefield 1 since it’s a new title and I was curious about its features.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next